User talk:Thursby16

Welcome

Hello, Thursby16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Joseph2302 (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your articles

Just so you know, most youth players that haven't played a match for a senior team aren't notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Per WP:GNG, you need to show evidence of significant, independent coverage from reliable sources, otherwise they will be deleted. If they've made senior team appearances, they will pass WP:NFOOTY. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Kelechi Iheanacho is apparently getting called up to MCFC's first team so surely this page should be kept? Plus he also played a few pre-season friendly matches last year.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thursby16 (talk • contribs)

Maybe getting called up isn't enough to show notability, lots of youth players could fall under this category. I'm trying to see how many reliable sources there are about them, but don't be surprised if someone puts them up for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Also, he didn't win the Premier League, because to get a medal you need to make a certain number (8?) appearances, same for the League Cup. There's been discussions about it before at WT:FOOTY, which is the Wikiproject about football, and consensus was that people that didn't play aren't considered winners. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. Did you see the source i linked with that? They said he won those trophies. Sorry :')

Yes some sources say he won it- they're wrong. Starting a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Honours (again) about it, but I'm sure they'll agree with me (since this argument has been done before). Joseph2302 (talk) 22:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Ah okok... So they'd only get that honor if they have played a certain number of games in that competition..

Yes, that's definitely true for the Premier League, and I'm pretty sure it's also true for the League Cup.

Also, sorry if it seems like I'm trying to be a pain, I'm actually trying to help. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Don't be sorry haha :') you're helping me

Nomination of Brandon Barker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Barker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Barker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sammanhumagain^t@lk 14:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelechi Iheanacho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelechi Iheanacho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelechi Iheanacho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sammanhumagain^t@lk 14:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlie Albinson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Albinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Albinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sammanhumagain^t@lk 14:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelechi Iheanacho

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelechi Iheanacho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Kelechi Iheanacho

The FIFA ref only includes appearances in FIFA tournaments i.e. World Cups. Things such as the African championships are not included. According to [1] he had 29 goals for the u-17s prior to the World Cup, plus 6 in the tournament makes 35 (he stopped being eligible for u-17 matches after the tournament).

On a wider note, welcome. As you've found out, youth players aren't generally eligible for articles until after their first team debut. Sometimes if there's been a lot of coverage it can be more of a grey area, as is evident in the split opinions in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelechi Iheanacho, but those cases tend to be in the minority. Though it might seem strict for players at big clubs, even players in things like the FA Youth Cup final often don't make it as a pro. The goalkeepers from the last two times Manchester City made the final (in 2006 and 2008) are two examples. While I hope Albinson bucks the trend, its far from a sure thing. It is perhaps more understandable if you consider there's more than a quarter of a million football articles on Wikipedia, which is a lot to keep in shape! For questions about football related editing, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football is a useful place frequented by a large number of helpful editors. Oldelpaso (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arsenal F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:05, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to New York City FC has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mosmof (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I have corrected several of your edits, it looks like they were in good faith but please make sure you are doing the right thing before editing. Paul  Bradbury 10:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Transfer Totals

Hi, I have started a discussion on the talk page of the 2015–16_Manchester_City_F.C._season article about transfer totals. Please join the discussion there before making further edits about this, lets see if we can reach a consensus. Thanks Paul  Bradbury 10:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andrea Pirlo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Karim Rekik page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Manchester City F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

i'll find a source then

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Damien Duff. JMHamo (talk) 21:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

i added the source

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Jose Angel Tasende, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 22:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Jose Angel Tasende page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Articles and Edits

Hello, I appreciate the effort you are putting in to updating articles and even creating new ones, however a lot of your edits are getting reverted and articles being nominated for deletion. I thought I may try and help by pointing you to a few resources and explaining why this is happening.

• Firstly as you seem to be mostly interested in football WP:FOOTY is a good place to start, take a look there, it's where a lot of the rules around what does and doesn't warrant inclusion in wikipedia regarding football gain consensus. Join and visit the talk page often, it will help you understand what is going on and put your point of view across where you disagree.
• Secondly, for most edits you will need to add a reliable source. The problem you are having is the sources you are using and/or the information in them when you add them at all. For transfers its generally only accepted that it has happened if a primary source makes an announcement (that basically means one of the two clubs involved in the deal). Agents and newspapers are not generally considered reliable in that context.
• Thirdly, speculation, you have added several things that talk about what may happen in the future, even what is likely to happen in the future. As an encyclopedia, only things that have happened in the past are recorded (with a source). See WP:CRYSTAL so things like Jason Deneyar joining the first team of MCFC. It hasn't happened yet, when it does then you can make the edit and explain where that has been announced. This isn't a newspaper, it's not designed to be up to date with all the current news, its designed to be factually accurate about things that have happened.

Hopefully this helps and you stay on as a productive editor. Other users may take you down the route of a temporary block if you keep editing in the way you are currently and that would be a shame, since new editors are a good thing, especially when they have passion for a subject. Paul  Bradbury 11:06, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Richard Wright (footballer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The source you added did not verify the content you added. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Oh, and please don't refer to users as being "hideously looking". Mattythewhite (talk) 14:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

There are several editors here who have tried to help you, you do not seem to be paying attention to that help. Please read everyone comments above, go and read the stuff in your welcome message and try and help yourself. Paul  Bradbury 15:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Goldbach (Tollense)) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with José Ángel Tasende. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC) I didn't...Thursby16 (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Please read

You have been reported to the vandalism board here. I see that you've posted a question on another editor's talk page so rather than looking at a block or a WP:ANI post, I'll hope you'll curtail your editing until you understand the issues other editors are raising. If you have any questions, please ask. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

All I did was add his profile to the external links section. Not really worthy of a ban now, is it?Thursby16 (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

@Thursby16: A lot of your trouble comes from not listening to other editors and just doing your own thing for a long time now, which has become disruptive. Feel free to ask me questions if you do not understand something before reverting. JMHamo (talk) 19:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It's not that one edit. It's the accumulation of issues. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:43, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

JMHamo Ok then I'll just ask before doing things i'm not 100% sure on from now on. So, how come those external links i put on the page aren't allowed? and in future, which ones are and aren't allowed on pages?Thursby16 (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Usually, it's Soccerway and the official profile link from the club. Like the last edit I made... JMHamo (talk) 19:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

JMHamo Ah ok. So just soccerway and their clubs link. Gotcha. I thought reliable pages such as ESPN and SKY would also fit in there but I understand.Thursby16 (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

We try to avoid a WP:LINKFARM JMHamo (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

@JMHamo:Thursby16 (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC) ah right. theres lots more to something that seems simple. lots to learn. Thank you.Thursby16 (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Notes on pings

You want to write them like this: {{ping|JMHamo}}. I noticed you changed the "@" to JMHamo and Winner 42 after. That won't work either because you need to add your signature in the same single edit. Changing text after won't result in notifications. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. So this would work? @NeilN:Thursby16 (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Yup, I got a notification. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Kelechi Iheanacho

Err no, I "literally" haven't nominated the article for deletion; I merged two articles on the same topic (Kelechi Iheanacho (footballer, born 1996) and Kelechi Iheanacho) given that numerous editors thought it an idea to create at separate pages, and then my internet went down (which is why I've been offline for 20+ minutes!) and I was unable to restore the proper version. AGF!!! GiantSnowman 12:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

But how come the page was nominated for a speedy deletion then? Unless the other page you merged was already nominated for it.Thursby16 (talk) 13:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC) @GiantSnowman:

Bingo! GiantSnowman 14:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

AfD comment

Hey Thursby, just thought I'd leave you a note about your vote to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NotGTAV. While it's true that the game is definitely a game, Wikipedia article subjects should be judged on whether they pass the threshold of notability; we're not an indiscriminate collection of everything that exists :) Sam Walton (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your message to Mattc1000

You should leave messages for other users on their talk page not their user page, please keep this in mind when next leaving an editor a message. Thanks and happy editing. TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 Leicester City F.C. season

added links pointing to Billy Jones and Steven Fletcher

2015–16 Stoke City F.C. season

added a link pointing to Anthony Taylor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angus Gunn (footballer born 1996)

The article Angus Gunn (footballer born 1996) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Adventure Capitalist (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adventure Capitalist (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure Capitalist (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 23:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2015-16 Premier League, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237: Reverted for what reason. Toure scored 2 goals. Hart has kept a clean sheet. City have the highest away win. Thursby16 (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

As I said in the edit summary, you failed to update everything in infobox as well as timestamp and also no source has been updated. You should follow the sources and this was not first time either. Qed237 (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237: The source which was there even said toure had 2 goals....Thursby16 (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Clean sheets source was not updated, and you still failed to update infobox timestamp and the rest of the infobox stats. Qed237 (talk) 21:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237: Then instead of moaning and reverting everything just update it yourself.Thursby16 (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Stats Table

Hi, when you update the stats tables, at the bottom the totals are bolded, so when you update them can you keep the quote marks around the numbers (thats the code that bolds them). Thanks Paul  Bradbury 18:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

City13 account

Hello, could you please let me know if you using the account City13? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@JMHamo: nope that aint me Thursby16 (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Sept 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Doctor (Doctor Who). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 15:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Timestamp

Hi.

When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 00:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

??

What? You never spoke to me and now in a sudden, call me a racist? Should I report you now or later? MYS77 ^✉ 23:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MYS77 ^✉ 23:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Etihad Player Of The Month

The article Etihad Player Of The Month has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is WP:FANCRUFT and does not avoid WP:Recentism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 11:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yaw Yeboah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Lady Gaga; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

what on earth are you on about? A picture of lady gaga and adele is not exactly a baby getting raped is it? Learn what inappropriate means before you try it on with me.Thursby16 (talk) 13:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Etihad Player Of The Month for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etihad Player Of The Month is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etihad Player Of The Month until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

What on Earth are you on about. Thursby16 (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Author: Big Balls

Seriously? I've reported the file to Commons. If they delete it I'll probably block you. Or you can agree to stop mucking about with fake author name and stop these uploads. Doug Weller talk 09:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Okok I'll stop mucking about. Was just a joke with my mates I won't do it again.Thursby16 (talk) 11:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I'll let you off this time. I see your files have been deleted at Commons. Please make sure you heed the other warnings/comments above also in future editing - you could I'm sure be a valuable editor if you try. Doug Weller talk 11:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Louis IV of Chiny, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: yeah i reviewed it but told the creator to add sources and categories Thursby16 (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah, I wasn't aware I unreviewed it....obviously both of us clicking review at the exact second. SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Stubs

Re this edit: please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like this which already has one or more specific stub tags. It just wastes other editors' time. Thanks. PamD 23:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

And, looking again at that article, if it's a living person please add {{BLP sources}} rather than {{refimprove}}. Thanks. PamD 23:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Easter palms

What were you thinking? It was obviously supposed to be a redirect! Adam9007 (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thursby16 Test Page Instantly Delete

Hello Thursby16,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thursby16 Test Page Instantly Delete for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Erick Shepherd (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Erick Shepherd: Ah so thats what the Sandbox is for. Cheers.Thursby16 (talk) 21:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Question for administrator

<Could you please either tell me how to block someone from editing or block this person yourself. . as they keep making foreign pages and even after they get deleted, he/she makes more.>

--Thursby16 (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Thursby. Only admins can block other users, so it's not something you can do yourself (at least not yet). Also, I think you're mistaken: MEDADCENTER-KSA (talk · contribs) has only ever made one edit, to the now-deleted المركز الدولي للأبحاث والدراسات (مداد); so saying that they keep making foreign pages isn't true. I happen to be an admin, but as the user has only made one edit ever, I don't think it's worthwhile to block them yet.

Incidentally, I'd like to second Athomeinkobe's advice in the section below: you're going a little too hard on these tags. Most articles require only one or two speedy deletion tags, not ten, and many of the tags you put on both that article and this one don't apply. Speedy deletion is supposed to be very strictly-defined--if an article doesn't exactly fit the criteria, you shouldn't put the tag on it. And as Athomeinkobe says, an article being in a foreign language does *not* make it eligible for speedy deletion. Thanks for your efforts to clean up the encyclopedia, but please slow down a bit on the speedy deletion tagging. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 06:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging of ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം

Hi, I'd like you to double check the tagging of the above article, which I have reverted. You tagged it with about 10 categories, some which contradicted each other (for example, it can't be both "no context" and an "attack page"). I was wondering whether perhaps you pressed the wrong button or something. In any event, being in a foreign language is in itself not a reason for deletion. The Google translation suggests there is nothing in there that is malicious and requires blanking. So I've reverted it. Hopefully someone fluent in that language at WP:PNT will translate it. Otherwise it will be deleted after about 3 weeks. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Again, please check your tagging. You marked John Money (builder) for deletion today under g1, a3, and a7. The article looked like this when you tagged it: [2]. While an A7 tag might not be inappropriate for that, the article is very clearly neither patent nonsense (G1) nor devoid of content (A3). The G1 tag is for *actual* gibberish, e.g. strings of random letters or words like "wjejrhfhhtnr" or "frog blast the vent core"--anything written in English sentences does not qualify. And no content means *literally* no content; there was plenty of content in that page when you tagged it. Again, please be more careful in the tags you apply to articles, especially deletion tags. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Athomeinkobe: So in future should I just keep deletion to one tag?Thursby16 (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

You should keep it to the relevant tags. Sometimes two will apply, for example non-notable (A7) and promotional (G11). Or non-notable and a copyright infringement (text copied from a company's webpage). But it is impossible for 6 or 7 to apply to one article. I must ask, have you ever read WP:CSD to understand what all of those categories mean? Another article you tagged the other day was the Arabic page المركز الدولي للأبحاث والدراسات (مداد) that Writ Keeper mentions above. The translated title of the article is "International Center for Research and Studies". I remember looking at the google translation of the article last week, and it was about a university in Iran or Saudi Arabia. I can't remember the details but it looked like a legitimate subject. You tagged that article as G3 (pure vandalism or blatant hoax), A1 (no context), A7 (no notability), G1 (patent nonsense), G10 (attack page), A3 (no content) and A2 (foreign language article already existing on a different Wikipedia).

• To tag with G3 means you must have read the translation and decided it was a hoax about a centre that doesn't exist.
• A1 means the article had only a few words, so you couldn't tell what the topic was.
• A7 means the article was describing a non-notable centre.
• G1 means the Arabic writing was gibberish that a normal Arabic speaker cannot understand (just random Arabic letters).
• G10 means it must have been designed to attack the centre or somebody who works there.
• A3 means the article was basically empty.
• A2 means you must have checked the Arabic Wikipedia and found that the article exists there. (I checked the Arabic Wikipedia and can confirm the article doesn't exist there).

I'm sure you will agree that it is impossible that all of these categories were applicable to just one article. So I was really surprised to see that an admin actually deleted the page as you requested. But that's a different problem.

In summary, you should only tag with relevant tags. To do that, you must read the article, double-check the definitions of the criteria at WP:CSD, decide if any are applicable, and tag appropriately. Please do not rush. If you find a non-English article, you have to check its translation using google translate or some other service. Good luck, and please message me again if you need any more help. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Erin Clachers case

Because she was in the line-up sheets of Glasgow City at the start of the new SWPL season. So she is part of the team that reached the quarter finals of the UEFA women's champions league. User:Funafuti1978 Funafuti1978 (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

A taste of honey tv

Hello, I removed your PROD template from A taste of honey tv. While I agree that the article should likely be deleted, your rationale: "Insanely short article for a tv show," doesn't conform to the deletion policy. I'd encourage you to read and understand that. I removed your PROD template and replaced it with a deletion discussion at WP:AFD. Feel free to participate here but be ready to back up your opinion with actual Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks! --Non-Dropframe _talk 22:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christian Distefano

The article Christian Distefano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Aoidh (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Christian Distefano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Distefano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Distefano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aoidh (talk) 16:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Andy Tooze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Tooze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Tooze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cucking (1st nomination)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 18:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kallan Holley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kallan Holley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallan Holley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Disciple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Palomino rabbit

Regarding this:

Some facts:

• The creator is new and has 20 edits.
• Palomino rabbit gets many hits at any search engine.
• You speedy tagged it two minutes after creation.

Some questions:

• Did you read WP:BITE?
• Did you google "Palomino rabbit" before speedy tagging?

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

State supreme court justice notability

Please note that U.S. state supreme court justices are inherently notable. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@BD2412 What are you on about?Thursby16 (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

• This prod notice of yours. bd2412 T 15:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TNA King of the Mountain Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abyss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Thursby16,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thursby16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Goldberg

No where in the video from WWE did Goldberg ever say he was retiring. You placed it as a reference he was retired which it did not. It has been removed and a discussion is taking place on the article talk page. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 23:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Kallan Holley

I just skimmed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallan Holley and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3961562/ says she had a recurring Role as JuJu in Creative Galaxy. This article lacks a character section so I do not know how prominent it is. Interesting in developing CG to find out? ScratchMarshall (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Your addition to 10 Second Ninja X has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not copy text directly from websites or store pages. -- ferret (talk) 14:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Thursby16. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. promotion of Curve Digital ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your edit summary

One of your edit summaries contained very obscene language. Please do not do this again. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Improper page moves

Please do not move pages to add extra disambiguation. This is the part of the page title in the parenthesis. For example, D. Va and Lumo (video game). We only use disambiguation where its necessary. Other Overwatch characters have (Overwatch) because there is already an existing page with the same name, i.e. Mercy and Mercy (Overwatch). Because there are no other topics named D. Va, or similar to it, we do not require disambiguation.

We also only disambiguate as much as necessary. Lumo (video game) has (video game) to disambiguate it from Lumo. However, there is only one Lumo video game, so adding (2016 video game) is not necessary. This would only be done if there were multiple Lumo video games.

Thanks -- ferret (talk) 00:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ferret: Oh okay. I just thought that, in the Overwatch character page, it just seemed more consistent within each page. Thursby16 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Our preference would be to not have (Overwatch) at all, but we have to include it in some cases since topics of the same name already exist. -- ferret (talk) 12:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ferret: Could a page possibly be made for each of the heroes? Thursby16 (talk) 13:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

It depends on whether or not they would pass the notability guidelines. Not all of the characters receive equal coverage by reliable secondary sources, so some will have articles while others have to be summarized at Characters of Overwatch. -- ferret (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thursby16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jordan Downing (footballer, born 1998)

The article Jordan Downing (footballer, born 1998) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosack (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thursby16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi Thursby16. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Coyote Peterson. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Matt Smith (actor) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fallen Legion: Flames of Rebellion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallen Legion: Flames of Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallen Legion: Flames of Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spretznaz (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Greg Nicotero. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fernandinho (footballer, born May 1985), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Idle Theme Park Tycoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idle Theme Park Tycoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idle Theme Park Tycoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on David Silva. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Stones, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:PlayStation Plus games has been nominated for deletion

Category:PlayStation Plus games has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jody Gormley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jody Gormley, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Voyce. GiantSnowman 21:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nettspend. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. CarbonLollipop talk┊contribs 23:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)