Jump to content

User talk:Thunk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==Welcome== Hello Thunk and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. If you want to learn more,

Wikipedia:Bootcamp teaches you the basics quickly,
Wikipedia:Tutorial is more in-depth, and
Wikipedia:Topical index is exhaustive.

The following links might also come in handy:
Glossary
FAQ
Help
Manual of Style
Five Pillars of Wikipedia

Float around for awhile until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. There are also many great committees and groups that focus on particular jobs. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Wikipedia:Translation into English and Wikipedia:Cleanup for sloppy articles. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy.

There are a few crucial points to keep in mind when editing. Be civil with users, strive to maintain a neutral point of view, verify your information, and show good etiquette like signing your comments with four tildes like this: ~~~~ If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page or ask the true experts at Wikipedia:Help desk. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 00:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Office of Surface Mining

[edit]

I added some more to the Office of Surface Mining, I started reading the annual report, got through like page 50. I fixed some errors and such. I know that I stopped half-way through, I will finish it tomorrow or such. I also added a template, same as the National Park Service Template.

I found a lot of information in the OSM's annual report, it's divided up into like 6 sections, I found a lot of info in the intro and the section on regulation of mines.

CuBiXcRaYfIsH 07:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IUCN Category

[edit]

Thanks for your e-mail about Jewel Cave National Monument. For each protected area, you should first look in the World Database on Protected Areas (http://sea.unep-wcmc.org/wdbpa/), click on "Search for Sites" to the left. (Jewel Cave is shown as "III".) If it is not there, I then guess based the definitions (also on that website) and similar areas that have designations. However, the designation (such as State Park, National Monument, etc.), is never a guarantee of the IUCN designation. There are many examples of areas with the same national designation being in different IUCN categories.

When all else fails, my default mode is:

  • Wilderness areas: Ib
  • National parks: II
  • National monuments and world heritage sites: III
  • Wildlife refuges: IV
  • Battlefields, historic sites, seashores, recreation areas, state parks, etc.: V
  • National and state forests: VI

I also put a non-displaying note in the text of the article, just after the infobox, explaining my guess (see the code for Fort Raleigh National Historic Site).

Also, you can get visitation stats for NPS sites at: http://www2.nature.nps.gov/NPstats/select_report.cfm?by=year

One more thing, if you add the protected area infobox to an article, please also add the wikiproject tag to the articles talk page. Just cut and paste:

{{Messagebox protected areas}}

Eoghanacht talk 18:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

US GOV Agencies Wikiproject

[edit]

Hi Thunk

I noticed that you have helped out with the Office of Surface Mining article, I was wondering if you would like to get involved with the WikiProject United States Government Agencies The goal of the project is to basically try to provide high quality articles on all the different agencies within the United States Government CuBiXcRaYfIsH 21:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MDM - Consultoria e Negócios Ltda.

[edit]

I've speedy deleted, since it's substantially the same content. There is a trick for re-nominations, but I forget what it is. Rich Farmbrough. 10:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, Thunk. I noticed that your profile said you were a law professor, so I was just wondering if you would like to join WikiProject Law and WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases. Please let me know if you are interested, and sign your name on those project pages if you decide to join. I happen to be a 2nd year law student myself, and I can tell you that we could definitely use more lawyers around here.

Thanks, --Eastlaw 17:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Earth Abides image

[edit]

I have replied to your message on my Talk page. --Slowking Man 08:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stephen King Misery cover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen King Misery cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Harrison WestOfEden.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Harrison WestOfEden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ral Partha miniature.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ral Partha miniature.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Radiant chains (talk) 12:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

[edit]

Hi Thunk,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rust monster.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rust monster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 22:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casebooks.jpg needs authorship information

[edit]
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Casebooks.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Thunk}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Grafton Street.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephen King Misery cover.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen King Misery cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]