User talk:Thumperward/Archive 97
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Thumperward. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 90 | ← | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 |
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:SPL map
Template:SPL map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CS gas (data page)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on CS gas (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
- Can you be more careful with templating people please? Plainly the criteria under which this is being deleted has nothing to do with me. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I understood you created this page back in 2007 [1]. -DePiep (talk) 08:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, and then you templated me with an A3 warning as if I were a rank newbie who had just created a blank page. You blanked it yourself in the process of merging it. As such it isn't an A3 candidate in the first place, but for the sake of doing the right thing I've deleted it under G6. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, that's the db-notice template hidden in the /doc, so I am glad I even found it. Still nothing wrong with noticing the creator. BTW, do I read that for you this problemette changed from "I have nothing to do with" to "as if I were a rank newbie"? Anyway, I've read A3 again and I see no issue. Anything else? -DePiep (talk) 09:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, and then you templated me with an A3 warning as if I were a rank newbie who had just created a blank page. You blanked it yourself in the process of merging it. As such it isn't an A3 candidate in the first place, but for the sake of doing the right thing I've deleted it under G6. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- The problem was always the latter, which was caused by you picking the wrong deletion criterion, which meant that the associated notice template was less of a friendly notice and more of a warning. It doesn't matter now; the page is gone, so let's just drop it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- (ec)I was responding to your concerns & remarks. From the start actually. Bye. -DePiep (talk) 09:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- The problem was always the latter, which was caused by you picking the wrong deletion criterion, which meant that the associated notice template was less of a friendly notice and more of a warning. It doesn't matter now; the page is gone, so let's just drop it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox element/headers
Template:Infobox element/headers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alloy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Admixture.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Article s6 (init)
Good morning Thumperward. This article s6 (init) is as a draft, I think it should be published because it is relevant to the world of operating systems. Thank you very much. --Rstmnq1000 (talk) 00:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a draft, it's a skeleton. It presently contains almost no content. I've added some secondary sources to the external links; these should be used to build the article out. s6's primary use appears to be in containers, which isn't mentioned at all in the article right now, and that needs to be explained. Once it's been expanded it can be re-submitted, but right now it has no chance as a standalone article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc. moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 22:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Christ. Replied on your talk. You need to fix this. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc. for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
"Intel® Atom" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Intel® Atom and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Intel® Atom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox GAA team season
Template:Infobox GAA team season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Very delayed thanks
I tried to thank you for creating Wikipedia:Wikipedia should be fun but WP does not seem to allow thanks for a create, just an edit. Thanks though. WP should be fun — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hey! Thanks so much! I had utterly, completely forgotten about this page, but I'm very glad it helped (and I'm going to take the time to re-learn from it). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Please fix the errors in the Breadboard article.
1) No errors before your edit - https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Breadboard&oldid=1085279131#References
2) There are errors after your edit - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Breadboard#References
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Huh. It turns out that {{refs}} only works for references defined before it's invoked. You'd think I'd have noticed that at some point in the last fifteen years. Fixed now, thanks. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Whit monday
Template:Whit monday has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melamine foam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bullet train.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Tldp
Template:Tldp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of permaculture projects for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of permaculture projects (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:User nl-1/doc
Template:User nl-1/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Template:User nl-2/doc
Template:User nl-2/doc, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User nl-2/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User nl-2/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:User nl-4/doc
Template:User nl-4/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!
|
Hey, Thumperward. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Electric fish clades
Template:Electric fish clades has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Thumperward!
Thumperward,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:PlayStation key press
Template:PlayStation key press has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. FeRDNYC (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Collapsible list bold
Hi Thumperward. I’m trying to find a way to unbold the text automatically bolded as a heading when using Template:Collapsible list. Is it even possible through some additional parameter? Thank you. TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yep. As below:
- a
- b
- c
- d
- e
- f
- Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply, I appreciate it. I’m trying to include a collapsible list within an another collapsible list. E.g.
Is it possible to make the second list display properly? TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- You're explicitly bolding those entries with
'''. That will always take precedence. Or am I missing what you're trying to do? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)- Yes, I wasn’t precise enough. The bold issue has been resolved thanks to your advice. I mean the second collapsible list (the one within another), i.e. Polish Coalition. The show/hide button is automatically above the title instead on the right (see the Third Way show/hide option for comparison), which might be misleading for readers. Is there a way to fix it? Thank you! TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- You're explicitly bolding those entries with
- I don't think so, I'm afraid. At least not without diving deep into Javascript. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Wouldn’t you mind to have a look at the article Senate Pact 2023’s infobox then? In your opinion, should I change the current version to the above one (despite the show/hide button issue), or perhaps is it fine with regard to Wikipedia standards now? Thanks! TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think so, I'm afraid. At least not without diving deep into Javascript. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- I would simply remove the parties from the inner list. Infoboxes are at-a-glance, they are not meant to be exhaustive and this is a very short article already. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Declined PROD
I've declined the PROD on Sweet spot (economics), but not strongly.
My concern is that the argument for PROD is not strong; it claimed it was a "common idiom" but I would disagree with that. While the term "sweet spot" may be found, the meaning is varied and has subtleties that the reader may wish to have clarified. And I'm not even sure it's that common, especially today.
I would not be opposed to a merger of the multiple articles into one, but I think simply deleting any explanation based on the user already knowing the meaning is not the case. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sigh. It's your article, of course you don't want it deleted. It's banal ("In a more general sense, the term can be applied to any optimization issue") and the single "reference" is to a blog post which is even worse (the sweet spot of economics is apparently the existence of the middle class). Merging would imply that we have articles whose purpose is to explain disparate meanings of words, i.e. dictionary definitions. PROD is such a useless system because it virtually relies on the article author having literally died since it was first created, and I spend enough of my time waiting around for editors to die already. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'll hurry up and die then, thanks. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ship's carpenter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hull and Seaman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Large see also sections
Hi! I saw you added the "too many see alsos" tag to a few articles, and since it was multiple in a short timespan (usually there's only 2-3 in that category across an entire month!) I was wondering if you had any specific way of finding these articles that have long see also sections, or if you just happened to come across them - I really enjoy cleaning these up, so if I could find them more easily that would help a lot :] No worries if it was just happenstance though! Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 01:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hey! Thanks so much for doing the work on these! I don't have any particular way of smelling these out (that's what the tag is for, after all) except that there's a tendency for them to clump around one another (so any particular article with an excessively long list might also be linked to from others with the same problem). I tend to check them all out when I'm doing {{annotated link}} cleanup anyway, so that helps. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Ivan Provedel lead section.
Hi @Thumperward. I already added lead section for Ivan Provedel page from David de Gea and André Onana as references (but I couldn't adding the name pronounciation), to be reviewed for too short lead section issue. Thank you. EdhyRa (talk) 06:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Perfect! Thanks so much! I've removed the tag. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC)