Jump to content

User talk:Thirdright/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

Arbitration clarification request closed

This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration clarification request in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises standard discretionary sanctions for the topic of Landmark Worldwide, broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:73 (number)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:73 (number). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Landmark DS

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Landmark Worldwide, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Apologies for this bureaucratic silliness, but according to the labyrinthine WP:AC/DS system you aren't "alerted". Which doesn't make sense because you were part of the arbitration case, but bureaucracies seldom make sense. Manul ~ talk 01:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, Manul. I was aware of the DS, and I do not consider your notification disruptive or chilling. Cheers, Tgeairn (talk) 02:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

Thanks much

Thank you for your help. — Cirt (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

@Cirt: You're welcome... just happened to catch that one on my watchlist :) Cheers, Tgeairn (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hydraulic fracturing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Anita

Sorry for the misunderstanding, this is a known fact in my region, how can i provide proof (article from another website?) Just trying to contribute :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.83.21.1 (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

ASAP Yams

Hello, FYI, I have left a note on the Admin noticeboard about ASAP Yams.. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content

Re List of new religious movement and cult researchers You are removing sourced content and vandalizing the page.If you do not understand the criteria for inclusion on a list don't edit the page. You're supposed to be an experienced editor - act like one. ThanksCathar66 (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please read WP:LISTPEOPLE, as referenced in the edit summaries for my removals, before making accusations. It is perfectly clear that a person is typically included in a list of people only if all the following requirements are met:
Saying that an edit is vandalizm when it is not is an attack. Don't do that again. --Tgeairn (talk) 21:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I think you have forgotten the basic tenet to all Wikipedia MOS Rules :Use common sense in applying it. Notability is not temporary - that you have succeeded in having their WP page deleted does not affect their right to be om a stand alone list where they are notable in their field.
The page itself lists criteria for inclusion as:
Inclusion in this list assumes having both the requisite training as well as actually conducting at least one research study on cults and/or new religious movements (using accepted methodological standards common in the research community), published in a peer-reviewed journal or academic book.
Thanks. Cathar66 (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for striking.
While it is true that the MOS is a guideline, we also have WP:Source list (policy), WP:NLIST (guideline), WP:WTAF (essay), etc. These all point to WP:LISTPEOPLE as how to handle lists of people. There's no compelling reason here to disregard the MOS. As for notability being temporary or not, I am not saying it is temporary. Editors had a discussion and reached the consensus that these people were not notable. Again, there's no compelling reason to include non-notable people in a list in spite of our own guidelines saying not to. --Tgeairn (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

You are perfectly aware that the WP:MOS is a set of guide rules. About 20% of them contradict the other 80%. eg:The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people) I have listened to what you have said and politely disagree. If you wish to continue this discussion do it on the article talk page. ThanksCathar66 (talk) 23:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, there are some lists that are explicitly for those notable here by having articles or obviously qualified for them, such as alumni of a college or residents of a place. But there are also lists specifically intended to cover the sub-notable, or the borderline notable; the inclusions criteria here are as specified in the list. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
@DGG: Thank you for clarifying. It appears that the list is being used to justify or validate the weight of some of these people's work(s), which is really where the whole issue keeps coming up. It's obviously a lot easier to deal with if we use the MOS guideline, but there will certainly be exceptions. Thanks again, Tgeairn (talk) 05:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
There's a reason why the MOS guideline allies only to some types of lists: There has to be some way we can deal with or mention things that are not themselves actually notable, in the context of more general subjects. We can include them in articles and make redirects, or we can include them in lists. and make Redirects. Both leave open the possibility of a future article. For lists where that isn;t relevant, such as the two kinds I mentioned, I have worked consistently for years at trimming them whenever I encounter them, as they need continual cutting keep the standard. DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@Cathar66: - You just blindly reverted the article without regard for what work others have done. You reintroduced one inaccurate link, two external links that violate WP:ELNO, and a number of malformed {{Sortname}} templates. I have cleaned some of these things up repeatedly, with edit summaries saying so. I'm just not going to bother again. Please demonstrate that the quality of the article is of some concern. --Tgeairn (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That vandal is vandalising myy talk page and epicgenius sign in book(u can find him under my talk page history) she said that she is giving us a warning and is going to missuse huggle (what is huggle and how it relates to vandalism?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

@Doorknob747: Reported to WP:AIV and should be blocked soon. --NeilN talk to me 22:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Landmark Worldwide". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 February 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Vandalizing a Biography

Please direct all the spammers, it appears there is more than one, from vandalizing the biography of Mikhail Tolstykh with stupid and biased propaganda.

I should NOT be the one getting any warnings as I am not the one who placed propaganda on Mikhail's biography, I am merely removing it. I will continue to remove it.

Sirtaki36 Sirtaki36 (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Ronnie Radke

I made a post earlier today on the Ronnie Radke page, yet it was removed for not providing a source, which I did. The information is listed throughout the link, and the Faustian pact was described at 9:15 into the video interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ao1ubPSmsj8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gb1225 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there Gb1225. We don't usually consider YouTube videos to be reliable sources, both due to concerns for accuracy and for possible copyright issues. It would be preferable to find a reliable source and use that as a reference when including the passage. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I don't think I can use any other source besides a YouTube video (since there is none). However, the video is an interview, and you can see the person himself (Ronnie Radke) speaking it, with an official AP (Alternative Press) Reporter. This video also won a Video of the Year award from Alternative Press. Gb1225 (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
@Gb1225: In that case, if it really adds to the article to have the interview piece in there, then I would maybe do a quote from the interview (similar to the Loudwire interview in the article already) and use the YouTube reference. Then put something up on the talk page to see if anyone else has a better source. Nothing against AP or YouTube, but they aren't exactly rock-solid sourcing and we would never use them for anything controversial. Since it's Radke talking about himself, it's got more room. Cheers! Tgeairn (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

edit conflict

Hi. Your edit to Landmark Worldwide caused an edit conflict. You'll note that I put two banners at the top of the article indicating that I'm in the middle of a big rewrite. Your editing interrupts my progress and is against ettiquette. Please take note next time if {{under construction}} or the like is presentCathar66 (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Nomination of Council on Spiritual Practices for deletion

Hi Tgeairn. It's OK with me to delete it. I think that the organization may in fact have ceased to exist. Peter1c (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

@Peter1c:Thanks for the note. I didn't find much about the group, and it was all around a single study they sponsored. Their website is still alive, but you may be right about not being around any longer. I'll let the normal AfD process see if anything else comes up. Have a great day! Tgeairn (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Landmark Worldwide, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Please comment on Talk:Jasenovac concentration camp

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jasenovac concentration camp. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

Please comment on Talk:2015 in spaceflight

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2015 in spaceflight. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration Enforcement opened

You are the subject of a request for enforcement at WP:ARE. You may view the request at the the Requests for Enforcement page and post comments and evidence there. See Wikipedia:Arbitration for further information. Respectfully. • Astynax talk 10:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Halperin

You are absolutely right to delete the red link, as it links to a deleted article. Sorry, I didn't check it. Kraxler (talk) 16:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Kraxler:Thanks... between the two of us we got it right! :) Tgeairn (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

AE result

As a result of this AE request, I have fully protected the article Landmark Worldwide for one month to allow time for disputes to be worked out without edit-warring and other disruption. Further, you are warned to ensure that your edits comply with the letter and spirit of all applicable policies, particularly NPOV. I would strongly advise you to engage with discussion about your edits and to seek outside opinions if discussion becomes deadlocked. I would also suggest that, if you have a potential conflict of interest with the subject matter, that you disclose it. I have given Astyntax a similar warning, and you can request enforcement of that at AE, but note that enforcement can also be requested against you should you fail to adhere to the expected standards of conduct. It is my impression that admins' patience with this dispute is wearing thin, and that liberal use of topic bans is a likely result, should the measures taken today prove ineffective. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Harry for your patience and perseverance here. I believe that your impression is correct and patience is wearing thin across the board.
I am dismayed that there was not a more significant result for some of the parties involved, and if it were not for the already worn tolerance of the admins at AE I would submit enforcement requests against John Carter for his ongoing personal attacks (even on an AE page?!?), Astynax for the filing itself (so soon after other filings at other venues didn't meet their hopes), Manul for whatever the nasty smell is around how a supposed email and statement by Callanecc got to multiple other editors before ever being mentioned on-wiki, and lastly for Theobald Tiger for his complete disregard for the Final Warning Callanecc gave him just a couple weeks ago and EdJohnston's warning a few days later.
Having said all of that, hopefully protection will force editors to cooperate on the article. Again, I appreciate your work here. Have a single-malt on me. Cheers, Tgeairn (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Because I can't resist

I am posting here because John Carter asked politely for me to not post at their talk page. Given the latest few edits to their talk page, I am - literally - laughing too hard to sit. John, hopefully you will take care of your friend. No need to reply here. --Tgeairn (talk) 02:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

UNILAD

Information cited is from public sources such as facebook page and twitter page of UNILAD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.43.45 (talk) 03:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Editing while logged out

In regards to your editing of Landmark Worldwide on January 30, 2015:

It has been found that you have edited while logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or IPs should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts/IPs on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your user page. Please note that future instances will lead to a block. Mike V • Talk 22:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@Mike V: What is the basis for this message? A checkuser was literally just run Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tgeairn to address these type of allegations - and definitively found that no such edits occurred. Please address this, thank you. --Tgeairn (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I've talked to a checkuser who has clarified that you were not involved with the IP edits. You may disregard the notice above. Mike V • Talk 22:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
@Mike V: Thanks again for getting that cleared up. I appreciate your efforts in this and all of the other great work you do here. --Tgeairn (talk) 22:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Remember (The Walking Dead)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Remember (The Walking Dead). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Cleanup

I just wanted to thank you for your vigilant and constructive cleanup and copyediting on many of the articles I watch (and on very rare occasion, edit). It's much appreciated. :) Keep up the good work! Quinto Simmaco (talk) 00:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

@Quinto Simmaco: Thanks for the thank you! I sometimes enjoy the relatively stress-free cleanup work. Have a great eclipse day! --Tgeairn (talk) 01:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

.

Regarding user space page

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

FindMyPast

Hi Tgeairn, I was trying to send you the email, but for some reason it's bounced back - can you try emailing me instead? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 16:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, replied - if you don't receive it let me know and I'll try the alternate you mentioned. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey Tgeairn, I'm not seeing a response from you in that Google form - would you mind doing that? I'd like to get this request processed. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

Please comment on Talk:Cerne Abbas Giant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cerne Abbas Giant. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

MfD nomination of User:Tgeairn/NPA diffs

User:Tgeairn/NPA diffs, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tgeairn/NPA diffs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Tgeairn/NPA diffs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Higgs boson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Higgs boson. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

Please comment on Talk:Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

Please comment on Talk:Brown rice

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taj Mahal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Taj Mahal. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

Please comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Re:Cogmed

Please have a look at these issues--Taeyebaar (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Tgeairn, has anyone asked you to edit Cogmed? It is not in keeping with your edits to date and the content you are inserting closely mirrors that previously added by someone with a conflict of interest. Guy (Help!) 22:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@JzG: No, although I can't remember what first brought me by there (my first edit appears to be tagging the blogs being used as sources). I think you may be confusing my edits to the article with someone else... I spent a few hours digging out actual unrelated sources, gutting the link farm, expanding the poor cites and tagging them with reasons, etc. I just ec'ed with you while I was trying to remove the history section and replace with some short prose. I think the article is probably worth saving, even if I am extremely dubious of their product.
Do you mind terribly if I revert you and go ahead with a few more changes? I figured I would clean it up somewhat and tag the remaining poor material, then come back after some others have a chance to improve the remaining stuff. I don't know what MEDRS would say about some of the sourcing there (lots of primary, which I was tagging as I found it). Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@JzG: Actually, I withdraw the idea of reverting... I can work from the "good" (relative term) pieces I found and go forward from there. If someone else wants to grab any of the sources I used, they are in the history. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

Please comment on Talk:Newfound River

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Newfound River. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

Please comment on Template talk:Aviation lists

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Aviation lists. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

Removed link in PWA article (2012)

Hi, I just saw that you removed a link I added to the PWA article in 2012. I honestly cannot see how this improved the article. Would oppose to me adding the link again? Raphman (talk) 21:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

Please comment on Talk:Croatia in the union with Hungary

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Croatia in the union with Hungary. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:Anthony Watts (blogger)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anthony Watts (blogger). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thirdright/Archive_8&oldid=1125488331"