Jump to content

User talk:TheresNoTime/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 15

23:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #460

April editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

Wikidata weekly summary #461

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration


19:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #462

This Month in GLAM: March 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #463

Wikidata weekly summary #464

16:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

Wikidata weekly summary #465

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I miss seeing you around!

Hi TheresNoTime! I just wanted to leave you a message to let you know that I was thinking about you... I miss seeing you around, and I hope you're doing well. :-) Keep in touch! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Likewise. --TheSandDoctor Talk 22:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #466

Wikidata weekly summary #466

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

removed EnchanterCarlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

removed Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration


Wikidata weekly summary #467

15:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

13:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #468

Wikidata weekly summary #469

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #470

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Teefa In Trouble

The page Teefa In Trouble was blacklisted from creation by you and the article was subsequently created by some authors as Teefa in Trouble. The content seems to merit an article and it would therefore be nice if the original page had the administrator access revoked to allow creating a redirect page. The creator of the original article had given me a barnstar (one of the few that I have), and its not nice to see the redlink which indicates that I passed an article which would not have passed AFD (The original deletion was G5). Jupitus Smart 03:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Jupitus Smart, sadly, TNT hasn't been around much lately, so I doubt they'll see this. But your request seems eminently reasonable, so I've gone ahead and unprotected the page so you can create a redirect. Cheers. – bradv🍁 03:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Bradv. Jupitus Smart 03:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for stepping in there Bradv, appreciated - sorry for the delay there Jupitus Smart! - TNT 💞 11:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Jupitus Smart 16:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Y u awake!?!?

Also hi. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Hey! And whatcha mean, it's only 03:27 - TNT 💞 02:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

added AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
removed HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration


July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Talk page stalkers - a moment, please?

Hi you wonderful editors - these posts aren't what Wikipedia is about, I know that, but bear with me a moment..

I'm having an evening of realising that many of the editors I "started editing with" are disappearing - I guess that's par for the course, people move on. There's some editors however who have made a real lasting impression, to me personally and to the project as a whole - I won't list people (half won't want the pings, and the other half aren't active!), but I do want to say to no one in particular that your impact here goes beyond the edits you make, and the contributions you make to both the encyclopedia and to other people's lives are really appreciated.

My fondest memories to date have been the casual chats with editors I've come to know, those random emails asking how things are going.

The takeaway from this emotional message to myself? Be nice, try not to get sucked into the politics of editing too much, maybe let an editor you interact with a lot know how much you appreciate them - they might be gone before you get the chance. - TNT 😺 02:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing of International Indian School Al-Jubail page

Hey TheresNoTime, I am The Medium (a student of the school). I have reported the ongoing Vandalism to our school authorities and I have confirmed that they are done by the students of our school. Whereas, I have undone all the Vulgar/Inappropriate changes done by the students and added some useful information on the school. It seems that you have mistaken me and TheStyxOath for Vandalizing the page, actually we aren't. You can thoroughly read the past 10 edits and find that we have been purging un-necessary info on our school. I hope you understand.

Medium — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medium offcl (talkcontribs)

@Medium offcl: Hi - hope you're doing well! I imagine you're referring to my protection of International Indian School, Al-Jubail? Don't worry, it wasn't in response to you directly, just generally as it appears to have been getting some less than constructive attention. Hopefully it settles down - TNT 😺 09:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

A talk page section innit

You didn't: see [42]. ——Serial 13:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129: 2018, gosh, where did the years go.. - TNT 😺 13:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

IP attacking Ponyo

Please revoke TPA for 2001:569:77A2:6700:C4CD:ACD7:9CD:689E (talk · contribs · WHOIS). General Ization Talk 03:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

@General Ization: Done, was keeping a half eye on it, but thank you for the prod. Hope you're well - TNT 😺 03:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

I'm not sure this one is a sock of xxxAnon. The behavior is basically a 0% match, even if the CU data says they are "likely". Not to put too fine a point on it, but I don't think the person behind that sockfarm is really capable of changing their behavior, to the point where the socks are extremely obvious, going back to the same subjects and making the same type of edits, whereas this account is coherent, actually responded to being blocked (a first for an xxAnon sock) and did not make any edits even remotely related to trains. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: I based those blocks entirely off of the CU results - that was a very poor choice on my part, and I have unblocked and apologised to the editor. Thank you for the message, and I will consider this more closely in future - TNT 😺 17:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
These things happen, and you fixed it super fast. FYI: This guy tends to create socks in a serial manner, one after the other, regardless of them being blocked. He was doing this all along, before ever being blocked for it, as if he can't keep track of login details and if he gets logged out, just starts over. That's about the level of sophistication here thus far. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Long time no chat!

Welcome back! I'm glad to see you around! I hope you're doing well, and I miss talking to you! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Well hello there not doing bad, fixin' to stick around so I'm sure I'll bump into you again! Hope you're doing good - TNT 😺 02:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
It's been too long, my friend! Much too long... :-) I'm happy to hear that you plan to stick around and contribute with us. You may or may not already know this, but we've moved from Freenode to Libera.chat with IRC, and we're on Discord. If you have a Discord, add me! I'm Oshwah#9999. There's also a Wikipedia Community discord that I can invite you to as well - just let me know. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
It looks like you're on the new IRC. Message me on discord; there are two results coming back with 'TheresNoTime' and I don't know which one is you. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
I've done the thing - TNT 😺 02:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I am glad (okay, admittedly excited) to hear that you hopefully plan on sticking around. It has been far, far, far too long, my friend. --TheSandDoctor Talk 05:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Ah thank you - TNT 😺 05:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
+1. I'm so glad to see you back. (Also now on Libera, same nick, Rihan, but just lurking with my cloak wrapped around me.) Yngvadottir (talk) 21:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
@Yngvadottir: Aw thank you! Feel free to drop me a PM on IRC, nick is still TheresNoTime. Hope you're doing well! - TNT 😺 21:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration


TheresNoTime permissions restored

Following a request to the committee, the CheckUser and Oversight permissions of TheresNoTime (talk · contribs) are restored.

Supporting: Barkeep49, Beeblebrox, Bradv, CaptainEek, Casliber, KrakatoaKatie, L235, Primefac, SoWhy, Worm That Turned

For the Arbitration Committee,

bradv🍁 02:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § TheresNoTime permissions restored
Things we like to see: this. :-) Patient Zerotalk 22:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Thank you for participating in my RFA

Thanks very much for expressing trust so early in the process. As to if I have clue, please consult my future activities. If you like, continue supporting me by telling me directly when I err or by calling on me when I can be helpful. BusterD (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

@BusterD: No worries! The best bit of advice I can give you is to ask questions, listen well and don't take things too seriously! Talk page and email is always open, so feel free to ask away - TheresNoTime 😺 21:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

SajidMir2

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SajidMir2. Multiple users including an admin have asked for CU. Thanks. Raymond3023 (talk) 10:04, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Raymond3023: Taking a look - TheresNoTime 😺 10:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, TheresNoTime, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! History DMZ (HQ) (wire) 00:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@History DMZ: Thank you! - TheresNoTime 😺 20:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you too! - TheresNoTime 😺 20:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I understand

Hey there! I just saw that you trimmed some informations from my talk page that reveal myself little too much. I understand. No need to be sorry. I know you guys do these for best. Thanks for thinking about my safety! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

@Chynapras: No worries! Hope you're doing well - TheresNoTime 😺 11:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey there again. I just saw that my request for Rollback rights was declined. I understand as you made it understand to me. I know I lost my temper many times but now, I no longer lose my temper easily. I wanted this right cause I fight many vandalism, and I mostly wanted the right when I was fighting horde of vandalisms in the Mohammad Mithun article until the page was protected after request from me. I obviously understand that I am not experienced enough yet to obtain the right. I will obviously let you know when I think I will be applying again for the right. Please let me know your opinion at the time cause your opinion is very important and you can also make things easy to understand like no other. I appreciate you. I thank you very much for your praise about my good works. I really appreciate that. Hoping to get your help whenever needed in the future, good friend. Cheers! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@Chynapras: Not a problem, and thank you again for your contributions! Keep up the good work - TheresNoTime 😺 13:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. And I will obviously keep up my good work. It was an extremely pleasant and sweet conversation with you. Hope to talk to you soon again. Take care, friend! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

About your decision on RFRollback page

I tried my best, do better work in every situation and did maximum to remove vandalism, please see my edits one more time. i have applied twice before. So I will accept your decision, but I will probably not apply for rollback again. I've talked to this admin a lot before ToBeFree and I tried to do work as he said, Thank you. ~ ItsSkV08 (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@ItsSkV08: Hey, I really do understand it must be pretty disheartening! You're doing a good job, and I appreciate the professionalism in reaching out to me for comments. I'm going to grant rollback to you temporarily for 2 weeks, and then we'll see how things go. How does that sound? - TheresNoTime 😺 12:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, A question--- Is it 100% sure to join WP:CVUA or complete the course only then will you get rollback rights? ~ ItsSkV08 (talk) 12:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
@ItsSkV08: No, WP:CVUA is not a requirement for rollback - it's just a good way of demonstrating experience and knowledge. I've temporarily applied the rollback right to your account. Please take a moment to review the links in the template I placed on your user talk page, and we'll review it again once its already expired. Just leave me a message here - TheresNoTime 😺 13:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much. ~ ItsSkV08 (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Multiple attempts to log in to my account

Hi there. I was panicking over something. There have been multiple attempts to log in to my account from a new device. I didn’t log in to my account from a new device for the last 2 months. I am extremely worried and panicked. I don’t know whether or not that anonymous person was able to log in to my account but in my notification panel, it was written that ‘there was multiple attempts to log in to your account from a new device’ and a change password option was given below the message. My password was already very unique but I made it more unique. I am just panicking over the fact that my account could had been a possible attack to hacking. I also don’t know that was the person able to successfully log in to my account or not. Could you please help me in this regard cause I am extremely nervous. 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Chynapras: No need to panic these do happen from time to time, it just means someone tried to log in to your account. As long as you're using a secure, unique password you'll be fine. There's some more advice at WP:PASSWORD which you might find useful - TheresNoTime 😺 15:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much. And yeah, I use one of the most unique passwords and I made it more unique after the event. Thanks for your cooperation again! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 17:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


revdel requests

For some reason, I get very confused whenever I request revdel, my apologies. I think I understand where to put the diffs, but it always seems to me that it wants the url that is being copy-violated, and I can't figure out where to put it. Maybe that is unnecessary? Thanks Jacona (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Jacona: Not a problem at all! I normally put that in my edit summary just in case editors are unaware that the template takes them (when they're present, I can click a single button and select all the required diff IDs - lazy!). I believe WP:CPI has some more information, and you might also find using Enterprisey's cv-revdel script a bit easier? - TheresNoTime 😺 15:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Jacona (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bmcabana SF

Hello, I am curious if you would be able to take a look at some of the IP and SPA edits at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bmcabana SF. I have already opened up a SPI on the author [43] of the article and know that we publicly don't connect IPs to accounts, however we now have a number of IP edits in the AFD in which all of them have forged user signatures and were made in within a few hours. If the IPs are related to each other we can go from there to clean up the AFD if need be. Thank you in advance. This subject has a bit of history when it comes to sock puppets. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Mcmatter: Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I've had a look at the AfD and can see there's a fair amount of disruption going on. I've endorsed the SPI for CU review, please see my comment there - TheresNoTime 😺 16:26, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your time and review on this matter. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Single Purpose Sock

Hey, I'm messaging you to see if you could provide any assistance with a single purpose account who I consider to be a sock beyond all doubt. Here's the details.

  • User:SinglePorpoiseAccount
  • This user has very few edits, all of them to only one article, hence their name. Very clearly someone who doesn't what their activity on 2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit associated with their main account.
  • Account is not even two weeks old, but knew right off the bat how to use talk pages, indent comments and use templates like an old pro.
  • They have listed policies and guidelines that take months if not years to master and has gone off on in-depth discussions regarding them.
  • Policies they've mentioned: WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE, WP:FRINGE, WP:RS, WP:IMPARTIAL, WP:THISORTHAT, WP:EW, WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS, WP:IUC, WP:DRR/3, WP:RSP and more.

So you can see why I think this  Looks like a duck to me. I would report this but I can't find a sockpuppeteer. Appreciate any help you can offer! ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲(talk) 21:20, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@FormalDude: Thanks for the message - this may well be a violation of WP:SCRUTINY or similar, but without any technical evidence of sockpuppetry, and no one to link to behaviourally, I don't feel there's much that I can do. There are some legitimate uses of multiple accounts, some of which may apply here? Often time will tell. - TheresNoTime 😺 21:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Well said, thanks for your assistance! ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲(talk) 21:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
So you're saying... cetacean needed? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Help warning level

Hi @TheresNoTime:, I think you are safe there. Can you tell me, If any new IP or Registered user add unsourced content on BLP on their first edit then what should we consider i.e delete1, vandalism1, or unsourced1. Damak15 (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Damak15: Hey - depending on the unsourced content added, I would personally use either {{welcomeunsourced}} or {{uw-unsourced1}}. We do need to be careful not to scare away new editors! ~TNT (she/her • talk) 11:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
TheresNoTime, If they add unsourced content on BLP on their second edit then which level should we give as they didn't done wrong on their first edit.Damak15 (talk) 11:25, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Damak15: There's no set policy for how to escalate through multi-level warnings, you should use your judgement each time you issue a warning. This page has a good guide on anti-vandalism for beginners, this one on all the warning templates and this for if you'd really like to get involved in keeping the project vandalism-free ~TNT (she/her • talk) 12:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@TheresNoTime: Thank you for your guidance. Stay safe!Damak15 (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

SPI

Hi TheresNoTime, apologies for the random message. I'm approaching you after seeing this SPI. I have a query. Did you run a check on CoinR? Both CoinR and Recdot have created their userpages in similar style, and almost immediately after their accounts were created- compare Special:Permalink/1036283692 and Special:Permalink/1035756171. Also, Vertob and Peccot are likely same as Recdot. All three have been awarding barnstars only to CoinR, which is odd. Again, apologies if this isn't convincing. Hope you have a great day. --Viridian Bovary (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Viridian Bovary: I'd previously checked this editor (hence this edit), so didn't check them again at the time. Given the behavioural evidence i/r/t Vertob and Peccot, I've rechecked these accounts. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ananislam#06_August_2021 - nice work! ~TNT (she/her • talk) 19:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

ANI

I was just moving it into the right place, it ended up in the wrong place as I started typing before the collapse. My comment stands. DuncanHill (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Pipe trick

I didn't know such a thing existed until I read your page!! Also, a great effort in de-escalating the BHG and Piotrus issue! -- DaxServer (talk) 18:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@DaxServer: I can't take all the credit, I only learnt of it recently from Tamzin's user page! And thank you, it didn't work out how I'd have liked unfortunately ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Then, some of the credits shall be passed upstream :) BTW, I've seen in some articles where the categories are set like, say, [[Category:India|]], what does it mean? The categories are anyway rendered without the prefix, with or without the pipe. How's it useful here? -- DaxServer (talk) 19:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
It's funny, when I added it to my page, my thinking was, "I bet there's someone who's been around over a decade who doesn't know about this because it doesn't show up in diffs." Guess I was right. :D -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 19:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2021





Headlines
  • Albania report: Collaboration with the New Vision Organization in Tirana; Summer of Wikivoyage Campaign 2021
  • Australia report: Representation and erasure: opportunities and risks that Wikipedia presents for First Nations knowledges
  • Brazil report: A wikicontest to celebrate and make visible the state of Bahia
  • India report: Rabimas proofread contest ends on Bengali Wikisource
  • New Zealand report: New Zealand holds its second Wikimedia conference, and a performing arts Wikiproject gathers steam
  • Serbia report: New chances for GLAM success
  • Sweden report: Photos of Childrens theatre
  • UK report: A Thousand Images of Islam, British Library Updates
  • USA report: Smithsonian Wiki Focus: Black Women in Food History; San Diego 73; Black Lunch Table Black artists
  • WMF GLAM report: A conversation about depicts and Structured Data on Commons
  • Calendar: August's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About Rollback rights

Hello, my rollback right is till tomorrow, please check my edits and give me rollback rights for extended period of time, so i can do my work to counter vandalism smoothly....Thanks. – ItsSkV08 (talk) 03:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

@ItsSkV08: I've extended your rollback permissions indefinitely - many thanks! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 07:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Uttar Lakshmipur High School

A new account, registered two days after the last account here was blocked, recreating Uttar Lakshmipur High School with a bunch of COPYVIO content - hmm. Do you need me to fill in the paperwork, or can you do a quick CU? Girth Summit (blether) 12:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

@Girth Summit: Probably best to log it over at SPI, keeps a good paper trail and helps the next CU. Feel free to give me a ping once its done and I'll take a look ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

LTA

Please revoke TPA for TikiTikiForReal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The account is a sock of My Royal Young, whose socks make abusive unblock requests involving abusive pinging of users. Thanks. JavaHurricane 03:57, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@JavaHurricane: Many thanks, guessed it was a LTA of some sort - have removed TPA/email ~TNT (she/they • talk) 03:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! JavaHurricane 03:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

SPI

Yes, that was an edit conflict; the way the pages work, I literally had no access to the comment I had typed without clicking "recreate". I was not trying to reinsert the SPI as active, but I also didn't want to compose the thing again elsewhere. My belief is that the piece of behavioural evidence is fairly telling, though I'm not sure anyone will care, either. Newimpartial (talk) 00:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

@Newimpartial: I guessed as much, not an issue at all, and thank you for the note - your comment will be in the page history and I am sure that ArbCom will consider it in their deliberations ~TNT (she/they • talk) 01:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi TNT, I came across this account and find it odd they do not clarify their affiliation with the WMF on the their User page. It could be simply be a mistake but is there a way to determine if they are WMF or do we just ask them? S0091 (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@S0091: I'd love to say I knew exactly how to check this, but in reality I went and asked the stewards Someone very kindly pointed out it was created by a WMF staffer, so they're legitimate. They seem relatively new to the WMF, so perhaps they've not yet been onboarded? I'm sure they'll create their WMF user pages soon. Thanks for the message though! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for checking! I might post on note on their talk page linking to this discussion so someone else does not report them to UAA or something. S0091 (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Editors admonished for their lack of funniness, advised to steer clear of So You Think You're Funny

https://xkcd.com/37/ -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Tamzin, it was actually an illegal unattributed quote of something I said with no hyphen. I apologize for any inconvenience. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 04:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
First they copy my signature pronouns, now they copy you. Time for a CCI? ;) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:15, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Pitzzaboy

Hello TheresNoTime, I noticed that you just suppressed some edits and edit summaries RE Pitzzaboy, you might also want to remove the edit summary of this diff [44]. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 19:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorted ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Ban evasion

Hello, please take a look at this sockpuppet that undid your edit and used bad words for you https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cealicuca&diff=1039355787&oldid=1039300820 86.120.179.182 (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi IP, I've blocked the user, thank you for letting me know ~TNT (she/they • talk) 08:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Can you please also revert the these two edits, which were made by him, per the WP:BANREVERT policy? An automatic bot prevented me to do the undo myself. The addition is not only illegal, but also wrongly formatted. 86.120.251.232 (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
I've reverted those edits. I'd recommend creating an account (or logging in) so that you're not caught by some edit filters ~TNT (she/they • talk) 10:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt intervention. Sadly, he / she does not give up. A new day, a new sock: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Szorostalpu_fustos_anyatokat 82.78.61.215 (talk) 09:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Blocked and reverted ~TNT (she/they • talk) 12:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

American revdel

My apologies for messing up the revdel request. I was using a script, and was confused by the user interface. After it posted the request incorrectly, I didn't know how to fix it at that point. Thanks for figuring it out, and I will try to use it correctly next time, or else report the copyvio to an admin directly. BilCat (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

@BilCat: No problem! they are fairly easy to figure out regardless! Many thanks for your hard work finding copyright violations, its really appreciated ~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Strange approach of editor

Hi there. Hope you doing fine. A relatively new editor named Sheikh Habib Rahman has contacted me saying that how can he contact me more easily and that he needs help. But the strange thing is he has been writing the same thing to a few other editors as well. I just can't understand his strange question and approach to editors. He can be a spam (I am just saying, not sure). So I wanted you to check on this editor and see that is he a spam or not. I hope you understand. Sorry for disturbing you. Thanks! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

User page link: Sheikh Habib Rahman 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

@Chynapras: Thanks for letting me know - it is a bit odd and I've left them a message ~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Cheers! 👉Chynapras👈 (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Requesting block

Hi, you are the one who blocked "User:SachinKapurD" (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub). I am from bnwiki, i want to let you know that they created another account ("User:AssimAlHakeem") and i blocked them on bnwiki. I can see they are active here as well, as WP:BLOCKEVASION enwiki should block the "User:AssimAlHakeem". Here is CU data. Sorry if it isn't correct place for this type of request. Thanks. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

@আফতাবুজ্জামান: Hi, thank you for letting me know - I have conducted a check based on your evidence and can confirm they are  Confirmed to SachinKapurD. I have logged this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub, blocked them and requested a global lock. Many thanks! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

SajidMir2

Hello TNT! You've done some good work in the past on the block evasions by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SajidMir2. Would you take a look there now, since there's already a pile of four suspected socks waiting for a CU check? Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 18:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Apaugasma: Taking a look now ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, that was very helpful! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 23:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Eyout

Hi, just so you know, I felt obligated to respond to the (multiple) pings I received from that now-confirmed sock on their talk page, but I won't be responding directly to them further. If there's anything you need from me, just drop me a note. Thanks. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for the Copyvio revdel on Antique Rome theatre of Ankara Vikipolimer* (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
@Vikipolimer: Thank you kindly! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your recent redactions

Thank you for responding to my RD1 requests. However, I think you deleted one revision too many on all three articles I tagged. You also deleted the edits where the content was removed. I guess I might have tagged it wrong. Again, thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Scorpions13256: Ah yes, I've unhidden those revisions Thank you for your great work identifying and removing copyright violations, it's really appreciated ~TNT (she/they • talk) 17:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the comment. It's great working on a Lepidoptera CCI because I am only nine credit hours away from a degree in Biology. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Also, I think you missed one on Delias enniana. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
@Scorpions13256: Ah so I did, thank you.. and that's awesome to hear! Any ideas what you're going to be doing with your Biology degree? Evidently you're relatively busy at the moment with University, but after all that's done, how do you feel about becoming an admin? This arbitrary tool puts you at 1004/1300, and from a quick flick through of your account and contributions I think you'd do fairly well... ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
I am actually dealing with quite a lot of mental health problems that prevent me from processing information normally. I also had a minor meltdown recently. In addition, I am also not well-versed on as many policies as it looks, but an RFA wouldn't make me say anything absolutely wrong. I am studying to become a DNA analyst. It has been my dream since I was 12. When I feel better, being an administrator would be the greatest honor ever. Would it be possible for someone to ask me mock questions on another page to see if I am just second-guessing myself? Scorpions13256 (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
@Scorpions13256: Apologies for the delay in getting back to you! I'm unable to look further at this at the moment, but the best advice I can give you is focus on yourself (resources) Once you're doing better, we can look at this again - Wikipedia will always need more admins, there's no rush to do anything, ever! Best of luck ~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Resources are lacking in Cleveland. I am going to another state to get intensive treatment for my severe OCD. When this is resolved, I will likely become a much more productive editor. Thanks again. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Services requested again

Hey TNT, we may already be needing your services again here, with four new accounts waiting to be checked. As requested by the two admins there, would it be possible to spare us some cleanup work through a range block of sorts? Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 17:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

@Apaugasma: All sorted ^^ ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much! But, what about the range block? Is that possible? GS left the last case open waiting for an update on that. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 20:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
@Apaugasma: Can't comment too closely on that obviously ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)