User talk:Thepresidenthal
Speedy deletion of Hoke County High School College Class Fridays
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/48px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Hoke County High School College Class Fridays, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you added to February 9, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of birthdays and deaths to the list. Refer to WP:DOY for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Polled Dorset
[edit]I have looked at the Polled Dorset article and I can see that many of the points that I raised in its GA review have been dealt with. In particular, when I tried the article with the earwig copyright violation tester here, the result was that no copyright violations were detected. I cannot reopen the failed GA application so you will need to renominate the article and then I, or another wikipedia editor, will review it formally. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations on the Good Article Status!
[edit]I noticed your Polled Dorset article got good article status. I mean, it's ALMOST as impressive as MY group's article that got Good Article Status weeks ago! Anyway, good work on the sheep article, yo!Luna002 (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)