User talk:The mike luby

Deletion of speedy delete tag at Raptor FEC codes

Please don't do what you just did at Raptor FEC codes. I already marked the article for speedy deletion, so you better leave this tag intact and wait until the article gets deleted. Nageh (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The mike luby, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 03:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DASH Industry Forum.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! gwickwire | Leave a message 01:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback - gwickwire

Hello, The mike luby. You have new messages at Gwickwire's talk page.
Message added 18:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

gwickwire | Leave a message 18:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DASH Industry Forum COI

http://.dashif.org

Hello, The mike luby. You may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest including WP:NOPAY. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People with a close connection to a subject need to be aware of Wikipedia's policies;

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view. You may also wish to avoid giving the impression that your account is to be used for promotional purposes. Regardless, doing so does not exempt you from compliance with Wikipedias policies.--Hu12 (talk) 01:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DASH Industry Forum COI reply

The purpose of the post was not to promote or express a point of view, the point was to gather feedback on an evolving open Internet streaming standard, standardized in MPEG, called MPEG DASH. The feedback requested is for deployment guidelines, that are useful to everyone, not just the members of the DASH Industry Forum (which is a non-profit, and yes I'm an unpaid volunteer in the DASH IF). The DASH deployment guidelines, informally called DASH264 or DASHAVC264, are out for public review and feedback until March 15, 2013, and the feedback requested from everyone is technical input on the aspects of MPEG DASH that they would consider relevant for deploying in their Internet streaming solution. It is unfortunate if Wikipedia doesn't see that there is benefit to Internet streaming in general to let people know through Wikipedia that their valuable feedback on these deployment guidelines is being sought, and that there is only a restricted window of time when this feedback is relevant. Also, for your information, DASH IF is endorsed by MPEG (as formally expressed in a liaison from MPEG to the DASH IF) to execute these activities for the Internet community at large. Mike LubyThe mike luby (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DASH Industry Forum concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DASH Industry Forum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DASH Industry Forum

Hello The mike luby. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "DASH Industry Forum".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DASH Industry Forum}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, The mike luby. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no conflict of interest in editing this article -- I have no products that sell into this market, but I do have a general interest in this market flourishing (as with many markets). I did not appreciate the biased tone of the background section and tried to make it more balanced. Although you allowed a couple of my changes to make it more balanced, you still left some obviously biased statements that make the article less credible (the background was clearly written by someone who does have a personal or business agenda against cloud computing). I will make a couple of more changes and I hope they "stick". The mike luby (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been writing about yourself and linking your company website on multiple articles, that is clearly a COI. If you're here to contribute to an encyclopedia, please find some stuff that is entirely unrelated to yourself or your business interests. Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red would be a great place to start. MrOllie (talk) 23:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]