This is an archive of past discussions with User:The joy of all things. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
After spending £1M, only now is the landfill search going to be in the right place?? I know there must be other factors in play, that we will probably never know about, but how can one police force appear to be so utterly incompetent? Sorry to be on a soap box here. Thanks for your edit there. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Martinevans123 Its alright (the soap box that is). According to a forensic pathologist; if he did get into a bin and was crushed, decomposition would be accelerated and because the police genuinely believed that the bin lorry only contained 15kg, they didn't search the landfill until it was too late.....The joy of all things (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
So in short, they were looking for a body and now they're looking again, but this time just for bones. It took from October 2016 until 7 March 2017 for police to admit that "an error had been made in the calculations of the weight of the bin lorry". Martinevans123 (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you edited Mark Rowntree's wiki page. I wonder, how do you know all those informations about him? Dee2895 (talk) 23:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Is this a style guide thing? I clicked around a few other RAF station articles and they all started with just "RAF Placename is a Royal Air Force station...", which seemed a less repetitious way to write the opening sentence. --Gapfall (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Just saw your talk page explanation. Thanks. Consider this a heads up that there are at least a few other articles out there that just open with "RAF Placename is...", then! --Gapfall (talk) 20:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, The joy of all things. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanking you for your info on my new created article
Hi, Thank you for your info, I was wondering was my article was in red. What I though was that my article had been removed. You truly are The Joy Of All Things! Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
My mistake
It is my mistake, as I did not see the link as the way the page was formatted. The missing persons name should be at the front of the sentence, so I have reformatted it. Thanks for pointing it out. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks - was going to sort out the refs now I'm back from choir practice ... ! PamD 22:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
PamD Sorry; I thought your message was saying that you would not be back for a while (real life calling)! As a former chorister, I completely understand the need for a good old old practice and singsong. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
@The joy of all things: nothing to apologise for (I'd have used "Thanks" except it's broken at the moment!) Just had to rush off to get tea and then get to rehearsal - Carmina Burana and Faure Requiem, all splendid stuff. Thanks. PamD 22:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Matthew Falder
Matthew Falder's father is a notable company director - surely that is notable and also surely standard to publish non-private background of direct relatives, especially when that detail has also been covered by mainstream media.
You need to sign your posts by using four tildes (The joy of all things (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)) but I am assuming you are Jimmytiptoes. As I said in my edit summary - this is about Matthew Falder and as the article is still a stub, unless it directly correlates to his crimes, I deem it unnecessary. The media also state he had a girlfriend, but this is not in the article as it has no bearing on the case/article unless she testified against him. That said, this is my opinion, if you differ, put it back in, but I cannot see how his dad's company is relevant.
What does him mum and other two siblings do? Is his dad's company Wikinotable (IE does it have an article)? If so, you can put it back in and Wikilink it, but currently it does not appear to have one, so its spurious information that is not central to the case unless someone says the paint fumes poisoned him and set him off and committed his crimes or he videoed people at his dad's work in the showers, etc, etc. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
A joy to review. Your article on Nicola Thorp, while short, sets an exemplary standard for start class articles in sourcing, writing style and layout. Please make more articles. I'll be following your contributions. Great work! Edaham (talk) 09:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Edaham in over two years, that is my first barnstar, thank you! Actually the page is mostly mine, but the piece about the heels is by someone else (Violetriga who had started the page from a re-direct). I had at the same time started an article on Thorp, so just added the filmography, ex links and infobox from my sandbox article. Still; it's a better Wikipedia when editors collaborate together, don't you think. Thank you again and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 11:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
List of companies in Leeds
Hello 'The joy of all things'
I noticed you'd removed an addition to a page so I just wanted to explain why I had added it in the first place.
I added the company Crisp Thinking to the list of companies in Leeds wiki as I felt that it's a company worthy of note. It is the leading company in it's field globally, which is rare for a tech company who's HQ is in Leeds. Normally if a UK company is leading the way then it's nearly always London based.
Crisp works with some of the biggest brands in the world - including the biggest kids brand, 4 of the top 5 luxury brands, the biggest pharmaceutical company in the world etc etc. It has been up against Silicon Valley companies and winning. The difficulty is that the company can't name openly a lot of its clients due to the sensitive nature of the work they do. But it's one of the fastest growing tech companies in the region and about to go through a period of even more explosive growth. So I wanted to recognise the fact that Leeds has such a strong tech firm situated here.
Other reasons for inclusion include the fact that it was founded by Adam Hildreth who was in the Guinness Book of Records as the youngest ever company director (I believe he was 14 at the time) and he has been featured in global media for his role as a teenage tech entrepreneur. He was advising government at the tender age of 16 and helped set out the online child safety regulations we have today.
I'm not very well versed in wiki editing, and the few things I've edited in the past I've not had any issues with, so I'm hoping this is the best way to contact you! I'll keep an eye out for your response.
Many thanks
Julia
2A00:23C5:89FE:3D00:4489:6AAA:B418:834D (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
2A00:23C5:89FE:3D00:4489:6AAA:B418:834D Hi; basically, as the company does not have a Wiki article, it is deemed as being not notable. An article should exist before such listing should be made. The problem with the listing was that it had an external link in the article which is a no-no on wiki as it should be located in an External Links section (my italics). As a solution; I have inserted it back in, but with a link to the page on Adam Hildreth so it will show Crisp, but be a re-direct on Hildreth's page. Thoughts? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 10:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Great thanks! As I said I'm kinda new to wiki editing (so I'm probably not even responding to this chat properly!). I'll see what can be done about an entry on Crisp Thinking too. Makes sense that they have one.
Appreciate your help and direction on this :-)
Julia
2A00:23C5:89FE:3D00:D180:9075:A0A4:DC1D (talk) 13:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
2A00:23C5:89FE:3D00:D180:9075:A404:DC1D Don't quote, but I am pretty sure that unregistered users cannot create content. You would need an account that has been live for a few days and a threshold of edits under your belt.
Re this edit: that was a diaeresis, not an umlaut. Some people use them in English to indicate the second of a pair of vowels that's not a diphthong. That is, you might otherwise that the first four letters of "cooperate" are pronounced like "coop", as in chicken coop. They're most famously used by The New Yorker, and when I went looking for an example of a New Yorker article using "coöperation", I found this editor's note on the subject. (Not disagreeing with your edit, though, just explaining.) —Steve Summit (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, many thank for this article, but can you revisit reference 15. I think that the 25 in the |language= parameter should be a page number. Keith D (talk) 12:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
I am a member of SELRAP executive, and have been asked to review the wikipedia entry. I see that you have spent some time updating this entry, for which our thanks. The current entry contains some inaccuracies (for instance, we are NOT proposing to re-open Earby station), and there are some more recent reports that have a bearing on the position (e.g. STP from TfN). In addition, the recently announced "Rail Investment Enhancements Pipeline" will inevitably have an impact. What I want to avoid is trampling over somebody's corns, or getting involved in competitive editing. It seems to me that this should be avoided if we discuss any major changes in advance. FYI I have already made a couple of small changes e.g. updating the membership; and the executive does have a view on this strange concept of reversing at Hellifield as an "alternative".
I'm unsure of your level of involvement, or if you are actually a member of SELRAP, but I will happily run my proposal past you for comment, once I have whipped it into shape.
Regards
Rossendalian (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Church of St Mary the Virgin, Masham
Hi there, thanks for another article. I have just had a look at Church of St Mary the Virgin, Masham and fixed a couple of harv linkages but there is a problem with refs 7 & 24 as there appears no destination for Fisher 1909. Unsure if the name or date is wrong or a ref missing. Regards. Keith D (talk) 17:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Aye, okay. I can't promise any startling revelations, but I was thinking about some of the red-links on the to-do list. It would help to know that I am not duplicating someone else's efforts. Thanks for reaching out; I'm all a-fuzzy now! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
[1] I have some of my "in-work" projects in sandpits there. I was looking to do biographies of the first British residents. WCMemail14:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
2804:5C:40C6:6E00:D422:FEC5:5214:ACD4 One of them was downright defamatory against French people and the other (ref Tag's ADHD) simply needs a reliable source to back-up what you have written. It is central tenet of Wikipedia that we have verified sources. Regards. Ooh; and if you are posting messages on Talk pages, be sure to type in the four tildes (~~~~). This will the autosign your comment and initiate a date and time stamp. The joy of all things (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Help with editing
Hi, I would like to thank you for your recent edits. I could really use some help with editing as there is a lot that needs to be done and I just can't do it all by myself. Is there any chance that you could help me out? I would really like that. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Davidgoodheart Thanks for the request, but with a heavy heart, I have to decline. My time is limited and quite honestly, the missing persons thing depresses me. I have had the following on my to do list for about three years now, but can't bring myself to do them;
Thank you for you time and knowledge, I am just starting out as an editor on Wikipedia, and would be glad for any tips, tricks and input. I am struggling to get pictures uploaded at the moment (and keep the bots happy), including a few photos (not mine) but I know have no copyright limitations as they have been distributed for free use. Regards MakingWrongsRight Makingwrongsright (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,957 last month to 14,992 on 30 August 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 153 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,407 articles.
Currently we have fifty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 August 2019, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Wiki Loves Monuments
September is the time for the annual Wiki Loves Monuments competition to get quality photographs of listed buildings and scheduled monuments in the UK. It would be good if any members in the Yorkshire area got out and about taking images of any monuments or listed buildings that they find. There are still several entries on the various list articles without images and it would be best to prioritise these if you are in the right place. Details for this years competition can be found here. There are cash prises of up to £250 for the best images that are submitted.
If you are not in Yorkshire then you are still able to join in as the competition covers the whole of the UK, separate competitions are available for other areas of the world if you are not UK based.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered September 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Shipley
Hi; I think I have just overwritten some of your edits. I was doing a long edit of the Shipley GNR article and you had done something meantime. I humbly apologise, it was sheer inadvertence on my part.
If you could bear to repeat you edits where necessary, I'd be very grateful; alternatively I will try to repair the damage tomorrow.
Meantime thank you for your hard work in this and other articles.
Btw I have shortened the article. It had a lot of duplication by others, and I have streamlined it quite a lot. If some of that overwrites part of your earlier work, I apologise, but I hope you'll agree that the article is better than it was. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Afterbrunel It is absolutely fine to change things, but why lose the references? And citation styles should not be changed as per WP:CITEVAR. As the article is stable, large style changes should be discussed on the talk page, to where I will move this conversation so that everything is in the same place. Just writing "Suggett, page 150" changes the citation style, and if you do remove text that have Group Notes, remove the note section. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
There was quite a lot of new material in my edit, which I thought was important. I don't know if you agree or disagree. As this has now been eliminated, and as I don't want to start a petty fight with you, can we agree on a form of words for the talk page which would enable a reader to access my material without offending your views on style? Afterbrunel (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,231 last month to 15,275 on 2 January 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 155 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,461 articles.
Currently we have fifty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
Well it is the start of another year and time to wish all members of the project a Happy New Year and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the past year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Dreamer's Bay
On 20 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dreamer's Bay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dreamer's Bay on the island of Cyprus is considered "one of the best-preserved ancient ports in the Mediterranean"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dreamer's Bay. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dreamer's Bay), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
As a compliment!! Not an order to work on it! If it had a section on geography and notable landmarks it would be close. If you don't feel like further improving it don't do it, I won't send one of my henchmen out, honest! :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld13:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld Do your henchmen say things like "No; I expect you to edit it, Mr Joy of all things!" As I hadn't edited said page in a year, I was a little confused. I am currently tied up slightly (in a non-espionage way) so I may get something done later, but not quite at the moment. Kind regards. The joy of all things (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and forty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,275 last month to 15,346 on 29 January 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 156 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,467 articles.
Currently we have fifty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Brexit
Well by the time you read this Brexit will have happened and this is the tidy-up that needs doing this month. You can leave the constituency link in articles that use {{infobox UK place}} as the template will hide the field in the output. Those using other templates will need to be edited individually to remove/hide the information. There are also a number of articles that mention the fact in the text of the article and these will need editing to remove the information or show that it was only valid until 31 January 2020.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon
Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs!♦ Dr. Blofeld18:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
There appears to be an entry in the topography section for Telford Coalbrookdale (opened 27 May 1979, closed 3 September 1979) that seems well removed from any "recent" heritage railway involvement. The opening and closing dates are well after those of the other stations and there seems to be no explanation why such a very short-lived station was ever in existence. (Someone has also added it the associated line template to compound matters further}.
Have you any news on this matter? You have been involved with Wikipedia information updates this line in past years.
Xenophon Philosopher A cursory check of the history suggests this was Steamybrian2 yesterday at 19:07. My last edit was in December 2016, when I was living in Telford and had access to the local library. I am no longer living in the Telford area, so I cannot verify or contradict this information, sorry. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 09:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and forty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,346 last month to 15,404 on 29 February 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 157 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,472 articles.
Currently we have fifty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Destubathon
The Great Britain and Ireland Destubathon is running in March, sign up if you can help, there's nearly $500 worth of book prizes available so if anybody needs books for other topics this might help you out! The project has 5,550 articles currently tagged as sub-class, members could join in the drive and help reduce this number by expanding them up to at least start-class. We are not looking to merge articles but to expand them. In the process you may be in for a prize.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
19:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Location vs. at
I fixed your edit here. per the documentation for cite book, the |at= parameter is used for denoting the location within the book, while |location= is used for the location of the publisher. best regards. Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Reedhawk - I don't know. You could ask on the talk page of Famke Janssen, which is where this request should have been lodged so that others may be able to respond either in the negative or the positive. AS IMDB is user generated, it is not reliable. I cannot see Britannica on the embargoed list, but that does not mean it is reliable. They might have sourced their stuff from IMDB! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 19:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and forty eighth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,795 last month to 15,980 on 30 July 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 180 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,525 articles.
Currently we have fifty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered August 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
18:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RAF slang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padre.
Welcome to the one hundredth and forty ninth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,980 last month to 16,104 on 26 August 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 181 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,531 articles.
Currently we have fifty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered August 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,104 last month to 16,176 on 29 September 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 182 is ahead of WP:GM who have 89. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,538 articles.
Currently we have fifty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Unreliable sources
Just a note about sources which have been decided are unreliable and should no longer be used on Wikipedia. The latest one is the Daily Mail and this is been removed at the moment. If this is used on any of the projects articles then please remove it and replace with a more reliable source. If another source cannot be found then the reference and the text it supports should be removed from the article or if you think that the information is important the text should be tagged as {{citation needed}}.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered October 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty first WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,176 last month to 16,259 on 29 October 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 189 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 76 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,577 articles.
Currently we have fifty nine Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered November 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
00:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Grinton Smelt Mill
Hello The joy of all things, I wonder if you could look at one of the articles you created Grinton Smelt Mill. There are a number of short references to "Raistrick 1975" that are showing in error. There are two full references that these could be a target for - Reference 8 ISBN0-903485-26-5, which presumably is Volume 1, or the entry in the Sources section ISBN0-903485-27-3 for Volume 2. My guess is that they all should point to the second entry, in which case you can add |ref=none to the first entry to fix the problem. Many thanks. Keith D (talk) 23:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,259 last month to 16,386 on 29 November 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 188 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 76 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,595 articles.
Currently we have sixty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
It is time to wish all members of the project a Happy Christmas. Though it will be a very different one this year because of the restrictions placed on us by the government because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Though there will be some relaxation of the rules for a 5-day period over the Christmas period it will not allow much of the usual festivities to take place. Hopefully the vaccination will be available early next year for the country to get back to some sort of normality.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered December 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,386 last month to 16,434 on 29 December 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 190 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 77 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,606 articles.
Currently we have sixty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
It is time to wish all members of the project a Happy New Year. Hopefully with the availability of a couple of vaccines things should start to get back to normality soon. The last year has seen 35 of the project's articles promoted to GA, while 9 have been promoted to FA and a list has been promoted to FL. Many thanks to all those members who have been put in the hard work to get these articles to a higher status.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
20:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for RAF Bowes Moor
On 6 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article RAF Bowes Moor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that stocks of mustard gas, thought to have been destroyed in the 1940s, were discovered at RAF Bowes Moor in 1997? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/RAF Bowes Moor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, RAF Bowes Moor), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 25 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marske Aerodrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roy Brown, credited with downing the Red Baron, suffered a serious accident not long after being posted to Marske Aerodrome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marske Aerodrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marske Aerodrome), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello, I could not remember which article I spotted a problem on until it popped up on my watchlist today. It was Wensleydale Railway, in a previous edit there is a problem with the Suggitt references. Unsure if the short refs have a wrong year or if there is another missing full reference. Can you have a look as you probably have the book to hand. Many thanks. Keith D (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,522 last month to 16,781 on 27 February 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 190 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 79 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,643 articles.
Currently we have sixty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
13:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Apologies
I was asked to edit this page as parts of the information contained within it are out of date. I'm new to Wikipedia and wasn't aware of the editing protocols. The cited source states that "industry can" use seaweed for bioplastic etc, and not that SeaGrown itself would be. SeaGrown as a seaweed farm is only engaged in exactly that - seaweed farming. Please can I suggest that the mentions of SeaGrown producing bioplastics in the future are removed, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LtShaker (talk • contribs) 13:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,781 last month to 16,840 on 13 April 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 202 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 80 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,650 articles.
Currently we have sixty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Delay
Sorry for the delay in publishing this month's newsletter, but I have been out of action without a PC for about 3 weeks. Managed to get it fixed after lockdown eased on 12 April.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered April 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,840 last month to 16,854 on 29 April 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 202 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 80 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,654 articles.
Currently we have sixty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered May 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,840 last month to 16,854 on 29 April 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 202 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 80 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,654 articles.
Currently we have sixty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered May 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hi Keith D, hope you are well. To be honest, I don't see the relevance - I have no problem with the Team17 page being tagged as Yorkshire, but the games themselves are set in a fantasy land which is not based in Yorkshire, and hardly any other companies products in the gaming world have a geographical WikiProject tag on their product pages - Four Door Lemon, who are based in Bradford, being an example. It's the same with books and music; Def Leppard were based in Sheffield when they recorded Pyromania in 1983, but that doesn't have a Yorkshire tag, because I don't think that the album contents relate to Yorkshire.
If the Worms games were set in Wakefield in some post-apocalyptic style, then I would agree to a Yorkshire tag, even Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas doesn't have a California tag, though it does have a United States WikiProject tag. If you wish to re-apply the WikiProject tag to the Worms games, then I won't quibble about it. As they are not set in Yorkshire, I don't see why they need a Yorkshire tag, and though I haven't exhaustively looked, none of the other English-based gaming companies have regional tags on the games articles, only on their company article. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 07:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty eighth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,840 last month to 16,901 on 26 May 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 81 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,664 articles.
Currently we have sixty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered June 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
