User talk:The Page Fixer

November 2014

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ultimate fate of the universe without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the far future. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits at List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes

Hi, your recent edits at List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, for example here appear problematic to me. You are adding a date for a future event, but you aren't providing a source. Per WP:CRYSTAL events that take place in the future need to be sourced. In addition, you are removing an external links section without providing an explanation. Please be sure to use clear edit summaries, lest other editors consider your contributions disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Dcbanners. An edit that you recently made to List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitsu episodes seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dcbanners (talk) 16:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have at least twice [1][2] removed the line "They are killed by Jay" from Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu, yet neither time did you provide an explanation for why this information was removed. For this reason, I am restoring the information. If you plan to be a part of the Wikipedia community, you should start using edit summaries, so other editors understand the rationale behind your edits. Since consensus is achieved through discussion, discussion is an important part of editing. In the future, if you notice that content you have changed has been reverted, pleae check the article's edit history to find out why, by clicking View history at the top of the page. In this case, you would have noticed my restoration of the content justified by the fact you didn't explain the rationale for removing it. Restoring content without discussion is almost certainly going to be perceived as disruptive, particularly when many of your other edits have drawn criticism from other editors. See also WP:BRD. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation in this edit. The issue isn't about being right, the issue is about using edit summaries to explain yourself so other editors understand why you are making these changes, since not everybody editing at this article is as intimately familiar with the subject as you are. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:LEGO-Ninjago Shadow-of-Ronin Logo.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:LEGO-Ninjago Shadow-of-Ronin Logo.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: 2 edits Unexplained removal of External links section and Reference section. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [3] The title of the series has been in dispute for a number of months when various editors were proliferating an unfounded rumor that the title was "Return of an Ancient Evil". This is why there was an embedded note asking for a source. Please do not submit this content again without also providing a reference from a reliable published source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Diff: [4] Improperly explained removal of content. No one can be expected to understand your rationale for removing content if you don't adequately explain your rationale. "There's something wrong with this" is vague. If you don't feel you can explain the problem in an edit summary, write "See talk page" and explain your objection on the talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LEGO-Ninjago Shadow-of-Ronin Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LEGO-Ninjago Shadow-of-Ronin Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Diff: [5][6] Unexplained removal of episode link section. You need to use edit summaries. If your problem with the section was that the transclusion wasn't working properly, stating that, or asking someone to fix it, would have been the smart way to go instead of removing the section. We have talk pages for a reason. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes, contributed colours that were not WCAG 2 AAA Compliant, causing problems for users that have accessibility issues, which must be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about this at WP:COLOR and Template talk:Infobox television season#Colour, which provide further information about contributing compliant colours to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Alex|The|Whovian 02:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Simonlucastweet.png

Thanks for uploading File:Simonlucastweet.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Page Fixer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Page Fixer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Dark Crystal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Removing "the" from the plot section just makes bad grammar. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Page Fixer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers 04:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your recent editing history at Tim Pool shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers 04:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Misinformation"

Please provide sources on Wikipedia, don't just change whatever you like at the pretense that you are the arbiter of true information. Check your biases. Thank you. 213.107.50.84 (talk) 10:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]