Jump to content

User talk:The Optimistic One/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Change Constant (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at The Big Bang Theory (season 12). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Discuss whether to split off a separate article about this episode at the talk page for the season, Talk:The Big Bang Theory (season 12). This is not saying that the episode should be accepted or that the episode should not be accepted. Discussion of whether to split an article should be at the talk page of the existing article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 10:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, The Optimistic One! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 10:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 4)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Better Call Saul (season 4) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 4)

The article Better Call Saul (season 4) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Better Call Saul (season 4) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 01:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James T. Kirk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Parker (Sam Raimi film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fletcher Moss Rangers F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fletcher Moss Rangers F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://fletchermossrangers.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hog Farm (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

The Mandalorian character articles

Hey Optimistic One. Thanks for your recent edits to the infoboxes of the various The Mandalorian character articles; your modifications were very much correct. You may have noticed, but I've recently nominated many of those articles for GA. If you have any interest in reviewing them, I'd be ready and willing to address whatever your review turns up. Totally up to you, of course. Thanks in advance either way! — Hunter Kahn 23:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

@Hunter Kahn: Thanks for the shout out! Nice work on them articles btw. I appreciate your request, but I don't think that I would be the best person to review them. Sorry for the inconvenience, but best of luck with the nominations! The Optimistic One (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
No worries at all. Thanks! :) — Hunter Kahn 19:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Emilia Clarke review

Hello The Optimistic One, hope you are well. I have been working on the Emilia Clarke article in hopes of possibly nominating it at WP:GAN in the near future. I was wondering, as another significant contributor, if there is any glaring issues that need to be worked on in the meantime. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:09, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@LuK3: Article looks very nice and tidy. Maybe you could split the career section a bit, the section that's named 'mainstream success (2011-)', might need to be split, 2011 was nearly a decade ago, and a lot has happened to Emilia since then. It would make sense to end the section after GoT ended as that was a massive moment in her career, you could also do with renaming the section as well. That's all I can think of for now. The Optimistic One (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I've split up the section and nominated it over at GAN. Appreciate your help! -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 3)

The article Better Call Saul (season 3) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Better Call Saul (season 3) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobbychan193 -- Bobbychan193 (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Flack

Please note that this comma is not needed in good formal British English. It's favoured by some non-British variants, but not formal English. And Enfield wasn't her home town. It was where she was born, but not her home town. Please see the documentation for details. - SchroCat (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

@SchroCat: That's fine, I'm not British so that would explain the confusion. The Optimistic One (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN

Please read this before removing/"fixing" any redirect. It reads, "Editors should also not change redirect with possibilities like [[Journal of the Franklin Institute]] to [[Franklin Institute#Journal of the Franklin Institute|Journal of the Franklin Institute]], so that readers arrive at the more pertinent article in the eventuality that it is created." I have restored the character redirect links you removed at Better Call Saul (season 5) because WP:NOTBROKEN also says, "Shortcuts or redirects to embedded anchors or sections of articles or of Wikipedia's advice pages should never be bypassed, as the anchors or section headings on the page may change over time." --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: There's a link to a character article for both shows above the cast, every character that is linked can be found there. There's no need to have a link for a redirect if a simple click can get you everything in the same section. The Optimistic One (talk) 09:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) No, Kailash29792 is right. I suggest reading WP:R; this is why redirects exist. For example, a link like Hector Salamanca is helpful because it directly links a reader to the subsection of the list of characters article with one-click. This is helpful navigation. To find Hector Salamanca's entry on the List of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul characters article is quite cumbersome because it is not listed in the table of contents (because it would make it way too long). So, a reader would have to endlessly scroll to find that entry in a massive article or Ctrl+F to find it. Does that not sound cumbersome to you and unnecessarily complicated when we can just do this: Hector Salamanca. On the other hand, a redirect like Daniel Wormald isn't partially helpful since it just redirects to the main Better Call Saul article, but that could be fixed so it links to a better spot. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
@Drovethroughosts: Just initially thought that having a link to a list of characters in the same section would make character links unnecessary. Hector's entry would be hard found for the average reader. But Lalo's would be found quickly. I do get your point though. The Optimistic One (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Lalo Salamanca

If you want an article to be there on him, you may start in this. Also notifying Drovethrughosts if they're interested. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Thanks for the heads up. I'll have a look at it now. Character probably now has a lot of reliable sources now that he's a big part of the series. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: Notifying Bill Mckern, another big contributer to BCS-related articles. I have also noticed that someone also made a draft for the firm HHM. The link is here. The Optimistic One (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series → Draft:Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series history merge request

Just wanted to let you know that the request to merge the history of Draft:Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series into Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series should not and cannot be done due to parallel edit histories between the pages. The best that can be done for now is tagging Draft:Trailer Park Boys: The Animated Series with {{R from merge}}, which I have done since that's what happened: You merged the content of the draft into the existing article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lalo Salamanca has been accepted

Lalo Salamanca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Cheers! The Optimistic One (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi The Optimistic One! I'm just checking in because I've been concerned by some of your recent edits. I know you're always a good-faith editor, but I've noticed some questionable edits you've made recently that I have to inquire about, mainly involving unsourced content. WP:V is a policy at Wikipedia.

I hope you don't take offense. I'm simply here to help if you need any or to provide guidance or advice. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@Drovethrughosts: Hello Alex! Nice to hear from you again! I'll explain the reasoning behind the unsourced content. I haven't had a PC or laptop since September 2019, every edit I make is on my phone or Xbox One or PlayStation 4. I added the part of Prison Break because there wasn't any information about why it was cancelled after the Disney/Fox merger. I didn't add unsourced ratings, those ratings were already added by the editor who removed the redirect on the article. I simply rephrased what the other editor said and added a citation needed tag. Trailer Park Boys ended in 2018, a new season is being made for The Animated Series, which is recognised as a different show. If there is another season being made of the main show, then I didn't see a reference for it. As you may know, I'm currently working on getting season 4 of Better Call Saul promoted to good article status. The reviewer wants more information added to the review section. I'm struggling with this part so if you could help me with the review that would be great. Lastly, the Chuck McGill edits weren't just removing whitespaces. I'm constantly adding content about season 5 and addressing other issues associated with the page. Of course, you have legitimate reasons for being frustrated with my activity on this site but I hope that I've answered your questions well. Thank you! The Optimistic One (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the response! For Prison Break, you still added unsourced content because you claimed the series was canceled with no citation. You are right about TWD episode, I misread the edit; sorry for that. For Trailer Park Boys, the very end of the lede states: "In October 2019, Smith revealed that filming had begun on another season.[6]" I understand you were making other edits to the Chuck page, but you still made about 40 edits that were literally just removing double-space whitespace characters, one-by-one. Sorry if I came across harsh or anything, I understand you are editing using limited capabilities right now, so that does explains things. Have you considered using a USB keyboard/mouse for your consoles, would make editing much easier for now. Anyway, keep up the good work and don't worry, anything that needs fixing, I will happily do it for you! Drovethrughosts (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
@Drovethrughosts: If you can, I need help with the GA review for Better Call Saul's fourth season. The Optimistic One (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Netflix and BCS

I seen that you reverted my edits regarding the inclusion of Netflix's broadcasting rights. Why though? The statements are factually correct for all seasons. The Optimistic One (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

I might have been a bit hasty there, as I was in a hurry; I should have left it and just fixed it for you. But, essentially, all you did was copy-and-paste the content word-for-word so it read "season 5 is released..." when the article was for the other seasons. The citation is also about season 5, not the other seasons. I found some other references so I will readd the content for you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

I was surprised to see an editor with as much experience as you showing up in the Copy Patrol list. Is it possible you were copying within Wikipedia?--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: Yes, everything I added was from the first seasons article. I didn't copy anything from any other site. I even said it whilst I was editing the page. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
sources are broken making it impossible to verify notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sulfurboy: I've fixed the references properly. Sorry for any inconveniences caused. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Look at all the red errors in the sources, and the rest are just a huge list dumped at the bottom - how is anyone supposed find the source for anything!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: I've fixed the references properly. Sorry for any inconveniences caused. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe). Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 4)

The article Better Call Saul (season 4) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Better Call Saul (season 4) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Much appreciated! The Optimistic One (talk) 13:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Half Million Award for Better Call Saul (season 4)

The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Better Call Saul (season 4) (estimated annual readership: 520,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
@Reidgreg: Thank you very much! I'm very honoured to have this award and I'm proud of being apart of Wikipedia! The Optimistic One (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dragon and the Wolf

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dragon and the Wolf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dragon and the Wolf

The article The Dragon and the Wolf you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Dragon and the Wolf for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TropicalAnalystwx13 -- TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MichaelScofieldPrisonBreak.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelScofieldPrisonBreak.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


Draft:Walter White Jr.

I have created this draft. Please provide me with sources, while I expand. Same with Draft:Marie Schrader. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: I'll see what I can do. The Optimistic One (talk) 10:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Wexler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ringer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Walter White Jr. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Walter White Jr.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Prison Break characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Behind the Eyes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MikeEhrmantrautBCS.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MikeEhrmantrautBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This draft is 97.3% copied directly from Daredevil (season 1) (with more copied from Season 2's article); if you're going to be essentially splitting a page, then there should be a discussion on the article's talk page to do a proper split. There is no reason to have identical information in multiple places. In other words, unless this gets either significantly rewritten (with more about Murdock and/or Charlie Cox's portrayal of him) or there is a consensus to split out the content from the existing Daredevil series and character page, this draft is a no-go.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Winger

A tag has been placed on Jeff Winger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 1)

The article Better Call Saul (season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Better Call Saul (season 1) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Hi, I'm really sorry but I can't see the value of any of the Middle-earth infobox changes you've made. We may be better off without the boxes altogether, but it's definitely not worth making them larger and longer without adding any value. Please stop until we have a sensible way ahead - I've a mind to revert all the changes but will think about that first. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: What's wrong adding that Faramir and Boromir are brothers? Also, every other box I've seen has first and last. Listing appearances isn't much. I'm thinking about adding colour to them. I was thinking gold like for example the ASOIAF characters (see Tyrion Lannister). The Optimistic One (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Brothers would be fine, if they formed part of a box that actually helped the reader to a noticeable degree. Colours are not required anywhere in the Middle-earth Wikiproject, thanks: they add precisely nothing except to make the articles more garish (at the moment at least the boxes are visually inoffensive). I can't see any point to first..last, especially when we're talking about volumes with names chosen by the publisher within a single novel that Tolkien split into six "books", not individually named. The (slightly) bigger question is what these infoboxes may be for, when they give so very little away to the reader. That's in marked contrast to, say, a species-box in biology articles where the things are clearly informative and helpful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
@Chiswick Chap: Okay, so we both agree that family can be a helpful inclusion? As for characters like Bilbo Baggins, they've been in multiple books. The boxes at the moment don't give much information but I know a few parameters that should be helpful. Origins/Home, so for ex. Bilbo: The Shire, and Aragon: Gondor. Before I add them, do you agree with they're inclusion? The Optimistic One (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I understood from the sensible silence that you'd decided against it, which I thought a wise decision. Well, if you insist on proceeding, the closest of family ties may be tolerable but it must minimise clutter - it's a thing that can spread ad infinitum to no benefit. The "so we both agree" is greatly overstating the case: I think infoboxes 95% clutter at the best of times. If you add anything clutterish I'll feel free to chop it, and if the box seems not to be saying anything useful, I'll chop it too. I strongly suggest you keep things minimalist. Th Gondor box is already somewhat baroque, with a pointless map/diagram. Aragon is a province of Spain with a large box; Aragorn is a king of Gondor with a box already quite long enough. Bilbo's box was way too big, I've reduced the image size. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
@Chiswick Chap: I was silent because I was busy the last couple of days. Those boxes are nowhere near as long as other character boxes I've seen and they only focus on the books rather than the adaptations. The Optimistic One (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Um, could you see the recent edit to Frodo. "Fellowship of the Ring" is ambiguous with the title of the book. I've wikilinked that one, see there for how. Please let's do the others the same way, so I don't have to sweep up after you the *whole* time. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Checking in

Hi there, The Optimistic One! I've noticed your edits are no longer tagged with "Mobile edit, Mobile web edit", does this mean you're back editing using a PC/laptop? If so, I have a follow-up question for you. Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

@Drovethrughosts: Yes! Although I still sometimes edit on my mobile. Whats your question? The Optimistic One (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Well, I've noticed you have begun expanding Better Call Saul (season 1) for its GA review and you have added roughly 10 bare citations and then tagged the article itself for link rot. So I have to ask, why can't you just add the proper, full citations? I obviously have no issue fixing references for others users, but I mean, it's not like you're not capable of doing it yourself no? Again, please take no offense. Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
@Drovethrughosts: I mean, if it was one or two references, then I wouldn't mind doing them myself. Ten would seem a bit much, so I just though that it would be easier for a bot to fill them in. No offence taken. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bronn (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bronn (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bronn (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prisencolin (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sgt. Johnson (Halo) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sgt. Johnson (Halo) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sgt. Johnson (Halo) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amy Farrah Fowler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Ferrari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kwik-E-Mart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HowardHamlinBCS.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HowardHamlinBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Optimistic_One/Archive_7&oldid=973188659"