User talk:The Gigantic
Appearance
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Please explain your autobiography & COI tags on Puja Joshi
[edit]Please discuss your rationale for tagging this as an autobiography at Talk:Puja Joshi. I count over 20 registered editors & also many IP editors. This hardly strikes me as as the work of one person. Peaceray (talk) 18:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Peaceray a you see this User:Abhishek8150 he has just created one page Puja Joshi, once page has been created he first move this page to name Pooja Joshi after that user has renamed that page to Puja Joshi, So it means this user is connected with this subject or user is paid to create this article. I think we should do investigation on this user? Thanks!The Gigantic (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Peaceray I am representing Puja Talk:Puja Joshi as her talent manager. The Gigantic here seems to get confused. I have had a brief conversation with someone over an instagram chat and now as I read this discussion, It seems that the person I was talking to is the same person tagging the article as an Autobiography. Yes, you are right. The user in concern here seems to tag article started in 2016 as a fresh article in his/her statement above which I may quote here "a you see this User:Abhishek8150 he has just created one page Puja Joshi". Being an actress, she may have fans in a large number and one of the person may have created such article in 2016 not knowing how she spelled her name and must have used the standard spelling of name "Pooja" which is a name for Girl child common in Gujarat and Maharashtra state of India. I am not saying this for sure, but after noticing how she spells her name as "Puja" using 'U' instead of 'OO' the user may have changed it to reflect with what her social media accounts would be. Not to forget, the article has many other contributors either registered Wikipedia users or public used IP editors. Which strikingly is far from it being an autobiography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamParjanya (talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- The Gigantic, I explicitly asked you to discuss this at Talk:Puja Joshi. The reality is that here at your talk page, only editors who watch your talk page will see this conversation. That is a couple of people at most at this time. It is probable that most of the registered editors who made changes to Puja Joshi are watching the article talk page. Please discuss your rationale for tagging this as an autobiography at Talk:Puja Joshi. I will not to discuss this further here. Peaceray (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Peaceray I am representing Puja Talk:Puja Joshi as her talent manager. The Gigantic here seems to get confused. I have had a brief conversation with someone over an instagram chat and now as I read this discussion, It seems that the person I was talking to is the same person tagging the article as an Autobiography. Yes, you are right. The user in concern here seems to tag article started in 2016 as a fresh article in his/her statement above which I may quote here "a you see this User:Abhishek8150 he has just created one page Puja Joshi". Being an actress, she may have fans in a large number and one of the person may have created such article in 2016 not knowing how she spelled her name and must have used the standard spelling of name "Pooja" which is a name for Girl child common in Gujarat and Maharashtra state of India. I am not saying this for sure, but after noticing how she spells her name as "Puja" using 'U' instead of 'OO' the user may have changed it to reflect with what her social media accounts would be. Not to forget, the article has many other contributors either registered Wikipedia users or public used IP editors. Which strikingly is far from it being an autobiography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamParjanya (talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Puja Joshi § Discussion of autobiography status & COI
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Puja Joshi § Discussion of autobiography status & COI. Peaceray (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)