User talk:The Explaner

[The Explaner userpage on Wikipedia (SR)] (:Talk)

Welcome!

Hello, The Explaner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss before reverting eldlessly

You have engaged in multiple reversions on Viverridae while I have not counted, I want to advise you that there are rules against edit warring. Please use the talk page to explain your position. If you cannot achieve consensus, there are other mechanisms to resolve conflicts. BiologicalMe (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mammals invite

Thank you for your recent contributions to Paradoxurinae. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about mammals? If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Mammals talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! Enwebb (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Ictidailurus" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ictidailurus. Since you had some involvement with the Ictidailurus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here in this book ("Classification of Mammals: Above the Species Level" By Malcolm C. McKenna, Susan K. Bell) on page 229, Ictidailurus [Kretzoi, 1945] is metioned as a synonym for genus Nimravus. The Explaner (talk) 10:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyaenodonta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kerberos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I hope I'm wrong but I'm reverting until I hear why it triggered Copy Patrol.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 15:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hyaenodontidae into Hyaenodonta. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyaenodonta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kerberos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pantolestids as pholidotamorphs

Hi, re [1]: is this outdated/superseded? regards, --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 21:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Well acording to a modern studies, family Pantolestidae is member of suborder Pantolesta (in order Cimolesta), and those mammals are eutherians but not memebers of infraclass Placentalia, just close relatives. In clade Pholidotamorpha (who are a placental mammals) there are only 2 orders: Pholidota and Palaeanodonta. Halliday (2015.) paper is not good studie, and there are some weird suggestions about mammalian relations (for example primates are close relatives of sloths and anteaters) that are in contradiction with DNA research. --The Explaner (talk) 22:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that illuminating... explanation; you do your username justice. :-) And thank you for contributing in general as a subject-area expert. I find this stuff fascinating and have been reading and doing a bit of wikignoming, hence this question: is the cladogram at Musteloidea correct (Mephitidae branching off first)? Someone keeps changing it to this (mustelids branching off first), and always gets reverted because they provide no source... but are they right, and if so, which source(s) should be used instead of Law et. al. (2018)? --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 18:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., I should really be asking such questions at a biology noticeboard -- I don't mean to badger you (speaking of mustelids). :-) Happy editing --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 05:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2018. paper is correct far as I know. The Explaner (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I attempted to fix the inaccuracies at Pantolestidae per your comments, but please feel free to improve it if necessary. --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 17:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indohyaenodon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kerberos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2023 in paleomammalogy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2023 in paleomammalogy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 in paleomammalogy (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no actual content or references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 in paleomammalogy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Explaner! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Smutsia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Smutsia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carnivoramorpha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pan-Carnivora into Ferae. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cautionary note about synthesis

A number of editors, including @SilverTiger12: and @PrimalMustelid: have expressed concerns that some of your edits inappropriately synthesise conclusions not present in individual sources, which is not allowed per Wikipedia:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material. Just a reminder to be cautious and to not go beyond the sources. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Namely, your use of cladograms falls far outside of what is acceptable- not a single source I can find supports the cladograms that you have scattered throughout the creodonts and early carnivorans. SilverTiger12 (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manis mysteria moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manis mysteria. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and Mammal species need to be accepted by both IUCN and the ASM's MDD, or have other reputable secondary sources supporting it. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 01:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

I can find no evidence whatever of Boualitomidae being a recognised taxon. I have checked a number of references that you posted mentioning it, and none of them mentioned Boualitomidae. I have made my own searches, and found no mention of it in any reliable academic source; all I found was on unreliable sources such as wikis, many of them explicitly indicating that the information is taken from Wikipedia. It is possible that you have found the information on such a site, believed it, and copied it to Wikipedia, though it does look as though alternatively you may have made it up yourself. However, it doesn't really matter which of those is true, because either way you have been posting information into Wikipedia which is not reliable, whether intentionally or not. From now on do not add any content to any Wikipedia article without providing a citation to a reliable source; if you do so you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. Naturally if you do know of a reliable source for Boualitomidae, which I have missed, then please let me know. JBW (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 in paleomammalogy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 in paleomammalogy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 19:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]