User talk:The Copper Miner

Welcome!

A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, The Copper Miner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

List of suicides

Hi. A belated Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to List of suicides here and here, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Please do not make significant edits without explanation. Explain on the article talk page what your concerns are. Quis separabit? 18:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply

Because, for starters (and this may be expanded):

1. Seeberville Murders is an incomplete, garbled, agitprop-ridden excerpt that belongs in the Copper Country Strike of 1913–1914 article which ends like the end of a chapter, not the narrative. The article is filled with POV and OR text, which cannot stand. If you can't improve the article soon and make it into an article that deserves to stand alone, I am going to merge it with the Copper Country Strike of 1913–1914 article.
2. Nobody owns any article on Wikipedia.Quis separabit? 18:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Copper Country Strike of 1913–1914

OK, glad we settled the other article for now but you still haven't explained what your problems are with my edits (see [1]) on the Copper Country article, which by the way needs better sourcing. There's a lot of unreferenced claims. Quis separabit? 18:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, these sections/paragraphs are unsourced:

*While most of the early mines failed, a few became successful, and eventually several major mines became established. The Copper Country quickly became the first major copper mining region in the United States. By 1913, the majority of copper in the Copper Country was produced by three companies: the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company, by far the largest and richest mine in the Copper Country, as well as the Quincy Mine and the mines owned by the Copper Range Company.
*In this system, miners formed working groups (usually consisting of family members) which then contracted with mine operators to perform specific mining activities. Typically, miners were paid by the cubic fathom of mine rock extracted, at rates designated in their contracts.
*Several major issues contributed to the strike of 1913–14. Many were related to the operation of the mines, but some were also social issues which had risen in the public consciousness in the United States at the time. The Copper Country copper mines operated a heavily paternalistic system, in which the mines watched closely over workers' lives both in and out of the mines. Historically, this developed for several reasons. Early mines in the distant Keweenaw wilderness had no nearby towns to supply their needs, and so the mines provided all services themselves. Most mines provided housing and schooling for miners and their families, as well as doctors, hospitalization, and even the construction of roads. Houses were assigned with preference to miners and other skilled laborers (as opposed to trammers), and to men with families (as opposed to single men).
*By 1913, mines were beginning to replace two man drills with "one man drills", which required only one man to operate and move. Miners had two major issues with the one man drill. First, the drill broke apart the historical family mining teams, leaving miners unemployed and bringing less income into a family. Second, a miner with a one-man drill operated alone. Any accidents which happened were likely to go undiscovered until many hours later, whereas under the old system a family member would be nearby to help.
*Miners in the Keweenaw were not unionized until just before the 1913 strike. Several wildcat strikes had occurred in previous years, but these were done only at individual mines, and usually involved only one group of workers (especially trammers, who were paid less than miners for physically intensive work). In the late 19th century and early 20th century, several unions had attempted to organize locals within the Copper Country, but none of them succeeded. All unions were strongly opposed by the mine owners. The Western Federation of Miners (WFM) began organizing miners in the Copper Country in 1912. The pressing issues of wages, hours, and the one-man drill encouraged many miners to join the union, and the WFM quickly founded many locals. These locals and WFM organizers began calling for shorter working days, higher wages, and the return of the two-man drill.
*The strike was the first strike to hit all Copper Country mines. After the first day of the strike, nearly all mines in the district were closed down, with mobs of strikers blocking access to the mines. Miners held daily parades to boost morale and show their strength. The mine owners, organized and led by James MacNaughton, manager of the Calumet and Hecla mining company, called for state governor Woodbridge Ferris to deploy national guard troops to keep the peace. The governor did so, which led to many confrontations, some violent, between strikers and troops.
*At the same time, miners were struggling from lack of pay and supplies. The strike was very costly for the WFM, which provided support to strikers based on need and family size. The WFM's coffers quickly emptied, leaving many miners and families living in poverty. A large number of families left the region entirely, looking for more work in the newly developing industrial centers of Detroit and Chicago. As the winter of 1913 began, the strike was weakening significantly.
Quis separabit? 21:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation Hokki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Operation Hokki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fuortu (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rautjärvi, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bgwhite (talk) 03:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

One cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. Wikipedia is unreliable because anybody can edit. One cannot use unreliable refs. Stop your reverting. Bgwhite (talk) 03:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I have protected the page so you cannot edit it. If you continue to add Wikipedia refs, you will be blocked. Read WP:USERGENERATED. When you finally understand this, the page will be unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

I only respond where the discussion got started. Most editors are this way. I will ONLY respond here and will remove any message on my talk page about this subject. Once again, you cannot use ANY link to Wikipedia as a ref. Wikipedia is unreliable as it is contains user generated content. This is also the same with blogs, forums, newsgroup and other selfpublished material. The link I gave even said to not use Wikipedia as a ref. Bgwhite (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Library stabbing

Sorry about the hoax report. I have rescinded it and you can carry on. There was no international coverage, so I assumed it may have been made up.

Note the wording of the report says "MAY" be a hoax, not "IS" a hoax.

Have a nice day, GammaRadiator (talk) 01:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cliff mine

added a link pointing to Calumet

Eagle Harbor, Michigan

added a link pointing to Calumet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Camp Lahti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camp Lahti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camp Lahti

The article Camp Lahti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Quis separabit? 19:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Note --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

RE: Seeberville Murders

The page is unprotected tomorrow (18 July). I recommend we discuss the article and anything objectionable. I am not going to engage in edit warring with you but will make reports as necessary. Given your refusal to comment at the report which was opened at ANI by me which resulted in the article being protected in the first place (see [2]), I am not sure if you are capable of engaging in good faith on this article which, regardless of what you say, I believe you feel ownership over. The article was reverted by the admin who protected it, to the "last stable edit", which was my last edit. If you revert before we discuss I will have no choice but to file a new report at ANI. Again, I recommend we discuss before editing. Feel free to contact me at my talk page. Yours, Quis separabit? 14:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

As I said, we need to discuss issues before you make any wholesale reverts. Also, you cannot just add reams of text which you have copied and pasted from other websites, as this CAN CREATE copyright issues, which can be a very serious issue (see WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASING). Yours, Quis separabit? 16:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Most of your reference links are broken and unformatted; nothing to do, by the way, in case you decide to start accusing me, with my editing (see diff of your last edit (see here). Also, view this (your last edit), which clearly shows the broken and non-existent redlinked reflinks. If you re-start an edit war, I will report you again. Do not revert wholesale -- review the edits made by other editors first, you may even agree. And you still have serious ownership issues, in my opinion. Quis separabit? 18:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Camp Lahti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Lahti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Lahti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/what-if-finland-had-been-prepared-for-the-winter-war.185434/

You added "Within the Spring of 1918, the Finnish Whites dispatched two expeditions, which later merged together to create one expedition. One of these two expeditions had about one-hundred men and was led by Dr. Thorsten Renvall, the brother of Senator Heikki Renvall, who was leading the Senate of Finland in Vaasa during theFinnish Civil War. The other expedition was financed by businessmen and was known as Lapin rakuunat (English: "the Dragoons of Lapland"). This group was also led by a doctor, Onni Laitinen"

Ref says In the spring of 1918, the Finns sent two expeditions, which later joined together. One of these two expeditions had a strength of about 100 men and was lead by Dr. Thorsten Renvall (brother of Senator Heikki Renvall, who was the leader of the Finnish Senate aka the Finnish Government in Vaasa during Civil War). The other expedition was financed by businessmen, and was known as Lapin Rakuunat (The Dragoons of Lapland) and was also lead by a doctor - Onni Laitinen.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)

Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in contributing articles to Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)? It needs contributors to increase diversity of content from different countries and bring about large scale improvements. The idea at some point will be to host a National Contest related to your country of interest. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Copper Miner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Charles Myer

The paragraphs you restored to the Charles Moyer article are interesting, but don't even mention Charles Moyer. Without some reference to his personal involvement, they seem to me just a rambling off-topic digression which perhaps belongs in some other article. I assume you disagree, but if you consider that these statements belong in the Moyer article, please tie them better to Moyer. I see that you are from Hancock. I lived there for a couple of years a very long time ago. Thanks. Plazak (talk) 02:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Copper Miner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hancock, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleveland Barons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
		You have lit up my watch list for the past few days with terrific additions to Wisconsin articles. Thank you! Dolotta (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

An Award for You

	Promotion of the place where people describe where they live by pointing to a spot on their hands award
	For all your great work promoting articles about my and your state.

P.S., it is possible to reasonably portray both Upper Peninsula and Lower Peninsula using both hands. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Autoblocked or blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Copper Miner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 104.143.192.0/19. Hello, I am the holder of this account and I contribute to Wikipedia on a sporadic basis, I usually use varied sources including my books on hand, which are a bit overabundant but nonetheless useful, I hope. I came on to edit an article today about the Calumet Charter Township, however, I noticed I was banned and I don't quite understand why. If someone could get back to me on this, that'd be great; also how do I change my e-mail for this account? The Copper Miner (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That IP address belongs to Telentia and is a confirmed colocation service. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You change your email address in your Preferences. The IP address you are using is within a range that is blocked as a webhost. If you have changed the physical location at which you access Wikipedia, that may be the issue. If you return to a location where you have successfully edited before, and clear the cookies in your browser, you may be able to resume editing. 331dot (talk) 02:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clarence J. Monette

The article Clarence J. Monette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, could barely find any sources, article has been an orphan for some time

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JooneBug37 (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)