User talk:The Behnam

Whitewashing

Thanks for the help. I actually got him blocked the last time, and he was right back as soon as the block expired. Nice to know there's someone else keeping an eye on the article! Dchall1 21:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD

Yes, I believe you should remove any sections that are no longer relevant or no longer being considered for dispute resolution. Should you want the page fully deleted, pleased rop me a line. -- Avi 04:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on my understanding of policy and the arguments given at the MfD, I do not believe keeping the pages as a "stick" to keep people in line is appropriate. If you need a page to marshal your evidence, or prepare for a possible foray into dispute resolution, then that is one thing. A long-term strategic threat would be another. However, that does not mean you cannot do it; it means that should such a page be brought for MfD, I would vote to delete, and would think most people would as well. :) -- Avi 04:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I have to. You have removed anything not pertinent to dispute resolution at this time. Should you feel that theer is a need to prepare to open a dispute resolution procedure with an editor, you should be allowed to amass evidence for that. -- Avi 05:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weigh in?

Since you took part in the recent RfC on Talk:India, it would be great if you could weigh in here. Thanks. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 17:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not likely to happen. He retired. See the tag on his userpage. Yahel Guhan 05:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex closed

The aforementioned arbitration case is closed. Artaxerex is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year. The parties are reminded of the need to adhere closely to the neutral point of view policy.

By the way, I am sorry to see you're gone. You were one of the fairest and most reasonable editors on controversial topics. Good luck in your future endeavors. Picaroon (t) 20:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of early Christians by the Jews

I noticed you participated in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical persecution by Jews (2nd nomination) discussion and I thought you might be interested in participating in a similar debate over at Talk:Persecution of early Christians by the Jews. Feel free to come by and contribute your thoughts. - CheshireKatz (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey vote request

Please vote in survey over whether to include text in History of the the Islamic Republic of Iran

Text and dispute is at http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran&diff=274961453&oldid=274952179

Arguements

found in edit summary and at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran#Deletion_by_KneeJuan

Thank you --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]