User talk:TheOwnkingAyush

Welcome!

Hi TheOwnkingAyush! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Palashipara Mahatma Gandhi Smriti Vidyapith. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 13:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Kartikey Malviya, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Alexf^(talk) 11:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am sorry but can't understand how it can be inappropriate link, it's the social media link that I added. Please help me to understand Wikipedia! TheOwnkingAyush (talk) 11:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions about Wikipedia, the place to ask is at the Tea House. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheOwnkingAyush, I'm Vanamonde93. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Vanamonde (Talk) 15:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Vanamonde (Talk) 15:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have once again suppressed the article you wrote about yourself. Please don't do it again; it may lead to your being blocked. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So please tell me, what should I write in my user page? TheOwnkingAyush (talk) 15:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social network. Your primary purpose here should be working on articles, not worrying about your userpage. In any case, what is and isn't permitted on user pages is described here. However, we do not generally allow autobiographical content from younger users, for their own protection. So I suggest you stick to writing about your Wikipedia interests. Also, please note that I've twice suppressed autobiographies you have written as articles. This is inappropriate for a number of reasons, so please don't do it again. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay TheOwnkingAyush (talk) 16:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please discuss with the community before removing large sections of content, Please avoid including personal information in your edits. Thank you. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panchdara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Panchdara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that an article without sources will not remain published on Wikipedia. Helpful information can be found via the links above. Thank you, Modussiccandi (talk) 15:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot. TheOwnkingAyush (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Please listen, it is a village of good importance and is ok for wikipedia but I am not a expert editor & here is nothing more information than it to be added. TheOwnkingAyush (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What matters is not the size of the article but whether there are solid sources to back up what's in it. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panchdara (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced. Therefore cannot meet WP:GNG, and there is no evidence of satisfying WP:GEOLAND either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panchdara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheOwnkingAyush! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panchdara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panchdara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panchdara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TheOwnkingAyush. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARose Wolf 14:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Move comment

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Super Hungama, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 14:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Cartoon - Snake. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Cartoon - Snake was changed by TheOwnkingAyush (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930609 on 2022-10-19T15:59:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked for 72 hours from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheOwnkingAyush. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 09:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]