User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:TheNuggeteer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
The article Harold Gomez (painter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not established with substantive sources, citations do not provide adequate coverage to pass WP:NARTIST
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
WP:GARC: Invitation to review Zbrojovka Z 4
Hello TheNuggeteer, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Zbrojovka Z 4. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.
To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #9.
PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article .tv you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 06:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
The article .tv you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:.tv for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afrique Victime you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 22:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Asik-Asik Falls
Hello! Your submission of Asik-Asik Falls at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ltbdl☃ (talk) 07:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 13:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Articles like Typhoon Virginia (1957)
Hey there TheNuggeteer. I saw your article on Virginia. It's a decent start, but there's not too much to it. In the future, it might be useful adding that info to the season article first. Not every proposed article needs an article, and some might never have enough info beyond a paragraph or two. For those storms, it's fine giving them a section in the season article, as long as they're covered somewhere. It's best for new articles to significantly expand what's in the season, like having five or more paragraphs. I mention that because the section for Virginia in the season article is largely unsourced. So what you wrote for the Virginia article could be more useful in the season article, where someone is more likely to come across it. Also when you make new articles, it's good to think about what lists they might be a part of. You could add Virginia to your newly created Typhoons in Taiwan, for example ;) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Thank you for your feedback! Instead, I will expand the season article and create the page.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗04:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| I'm glad you stuck with it and made the improvements to the Tropical Storm Kai-tak article, which is now a good article! There is a lot of stuff to cover, but I'll happily work with you if you're open to it. Cheers to your contributions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
- @Hurricanehink Thank you for giving this barnstar!
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗23:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)- For sure. I wanted to kind of guide you as for what's expected in a good article for a retired storm. I'm sorry if I was hard to work with/insistent, but there were a few things that are in nearly every other featured/good typhoon article. I wanted to know if you wanted any mentoring, or general advice. It takes a lot to write a good article, but you are capable of it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm really happy to get my first GA, but do you think the article can fit to the FA criteria? I only used 3 sources from relief web, but I can include all.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗00:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)- To get it to FA, you'll have to expand the meteorological history to an additional paragraph. I always felt like it could've had more detail, but I didn't want to use that to hold back the GA nomination. Some of the wording is still clunky, like "On December 18, NASA said that the storm was about 23 miles per hour (37 km/h) and had a rainfall rate of 192.786 millimetres (7.5900 in) per hour." Also, I always felt like there could be more detail. Maybe having a section for all of the Philippines, and then a more thorough account island-by-island? There are also practically no journal articles, and there are few local sources. Also, your citations are going to be an issue, as it's not as clean and proper as it could be. If you're willing to do the work, it could probably eventually get to FA status, but I don't think the article is that close yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Will do anything
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗02:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) - If you want, you can participate in the peer review.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗10:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Will do anything
- To get it to FA, you'll have to expand the meteorological history to an additional paragraph. I always felt like it could've had more detail, but I didn't want to use that to hold back the GA nomination. Some of the wording is still clunky, like "On December 18, NASA said that the storm was about 23 miles per hour (37 km/h) and had a rainfall rate of 192.786 millimetres (7.5900 in) per hour." Also, I always felt like there could be more detail. Maybe having a section for all of the Philippines, and then a more thorough account island-by-island? There are also practically no journal articles, and there are few local sources. Also, your citations are going to be an issue, as it's not as clean and proper as it could be. If you're willing to do the work, it could probably eventually get to FA status, but I don't think the article is that close yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm really happy to get my first GA, but do you think the article can fit to the FA criteria? I only used 3 sources from relief web, but I can include all.
- For sure. I wanted to kind of guide you as for what's expected in a good article for a retired storm. I'm sorry if I was hard to work with/insistent, but there were a few things that are in nearly every other featured/good typhoon article. I wanted to know if you wanted any mentoring, or general advice. It takes a lot to write a good article, but you are capable of it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Hey there, do you mean like the advisories for a given storm? Check the talk pages for season articles. For Kai-tak, for example, they appear under the talk page for the season under December, which shows all of the archived advisories. Is that what you meant? Or did you mean like the best track? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Kai-tak
The article Tropical Storm Kai-tak you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
Hello, you agreed to review the article Tropical Storm Harold for Good Article status but haven't begun since you opened the review 11 days ago. Are you still able to perform the review? JayTee⛈️ 15:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @JayTee32 Sorry, working on multiple reviews (probably a bad idea).
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗03:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)- Coming back to this, you've been very active the past few days and still have not gotten back to reviewing Harold even after I pinged you two days ago. Please do not commit to reviewing an article if you can't do so in a timely and concise manner. JayTee⛈️ 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Edsel Galeos has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 01:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)August blitz bling
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to TheNuggeteer for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime
The article Afrique Victime you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afrique Victime for comments about the article, and Talk:Afrique Victime/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Peer review limit
Hello, I've noticed that you've put up several articles for peer review. Per the first point of Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines, editors are limited to only one peer review request at a time. I suggest you choose which one you most urgently want feedback for and then take down the others. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Must've missed it, Tropical Storm Kai-tak already has a response, so can you archive it? Going to close Ilana (The Creator), leaving Afrique Victime.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗03:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Afrique Victime
Hello! Your submission of Afrique Victime at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hi TheNuggeteer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
No Poop July moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to No Poop July. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TyphoonAmpil -- TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)