User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
The article Harold Gomez (painter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not established with substantive sources, citations do not provide adequate coverage to pass WP:NARTIST
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
WP:GARC: Invitation to review Zbrojovka Z 4
Hello TheNuggeteer, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Zbrojovka Z 4. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.
To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #9.
PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article .tv you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 06:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
The article .tv you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:.tv for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FishLoveHam -- FishLoveHam (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afrique Victime you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 22:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Asik-Asik Falls
Hello! Your submission of Asik-Asik Falls at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ltbdl☃ (talk) 07:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 13:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Articles like Typhoon Virginia (1957)
Hey there TheNuggeteer. I saw your article on Virginia. It's a decent start, but there's not too much to it. In the future, it might be useful adding that info to the season article first. Not every proposed article needs an article, and some might never have enough info beyond a paragraph or two. For those storms, it's fine giving them a section in the season article, as long as they're covered somewhere. It's best for new articles to significantly expand what's in the season, like having five or more paragraphs. I mention that because the section for Virginia in the season article is largely unsourced. So what you wrote for the Virginia article could be more useful in the season article, where someone is more likely to come across it. Also when you make new articles, it's good to think about what lists they might be a part of. You could add Virginia to your newly created Typhoons in Taiwan, for example ;) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Thank you for your feedback! Instead, I will expand the season article and create the page.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗04:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| I'm glad you stuck with it and made the improvements to the Tropical Storm Kai-tak article, which is now a good article! There is a lot of stuff to cover, but I'll happily work with you if you're open to it. Cheers to your contributions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
- @Hurricanehink Thank you for giving this barnstar!
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗23:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)- For sure. I wanted to kind of guide you as for what's expected in a good article for a retired storm. I'm sorry if I was hard to work with/insistent, but there were a few things that are in nearly every other featured/good typhoon article. I wanted to know if you wanted any mentoring, or general advice. It takes a lot to write a good article, but you are capable of it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm really happy to get my first GA, but do you think the article can fit to the FA criteria? I only used 3 sources from relief web, but I can include all.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗00:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)- To get it to FA, you'll have to expand the meteorological history to an additional paragraph. I always felt like it could've had more detail, but I didn't want to use that to hold back the GA nomination. Some of the wording is still clunky, like "On December 18, NASA said that the storm was about 23 miles per hour (37 km/h) and had a rainfall rate of 192.786 millimetres (7.5900 in) per hour." Also, I always felt like there could be more detail. Maybe having a section for all of the Philippines, and then a more thorough account island-by-island? There are also practically no journal articles, and there are few local sources. Also, your citations are going to be an issue, as it's not as clean and proper as it could be. If you're willing to do the work, it could probably eventually get to FA status, but I don't think the article is that close yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Will do anything
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗02:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) - If you want, you can participate in the peer review.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗10:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink Will do anything
- To get it to FA, you'll have to expand the meteorological history to an additional paragraph. I always felt like it could've had more detail, but I didn't want to use that to hold back the GA nomination. Some of the wording is still clunky, like "On December 18, NASA said that the storm was about 23 miles per hour (37 km/h) and had a rainfall rate of 192.786 millimetres (7.5900 in) per hour." Also, I always felt like there could be more detail. Maybe having a section for all of the Philippines, and then a more thorough account island-by-island? There are also practically no journal articles, and there are few local sources. Also, your citations are going to be an issue, as it's not as clean and proper as it could be. If you're willing to do the work, it could probably eventually get to FA status, but I don't think the article is that close yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm really happy to get my first GA, but do you think the article can fit to the FA criteria? I only used 3 sources from relief web, but I can include all.
- For sure. I wanted to kind of guide you as for what's expected in a good article for a retired storm. I'm sorry if I was hard to work with/insistent, but there were a few things that are in nearly every other featured/good typhoon article. I wanted to know if you wanted any mentoring, or general advice. It takes a lot to write a good article, but you are capable of it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Hey there, do you mean like the advisories for a given storm? Check the talk pages for season articles. For Kai-tak, for example, they appear under the talk page for the season under December, which shows all of the archived advisories. Is that what you meant? Or did you mean like the best track? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Kai-tak
The article Tropical Storm Kai-tak you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)