User talk:TheMouseMen

Thumbnail image sizes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for all your contributions so far. One thing to point out that might be helpful for you is that if you are finding the thumbnail images too small then you can change their default settings for your account. You will find a dropdown list in the 'Appearance' tab on your 'Preferences' page (link top right on most pages). As everyone is accessing Wikipedia on different sized screens, with different font size settings and so on, we generally don't force the size of thumbnails. This allows users to choose a size that suits their own preferences, and if they want to see a detailed close up they can always click through to see the full image. Hope that helps, and happy editing. Pyrop e 12:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Association for Immediate Care, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This and the 7/7 article both need to be properly referenced. You can't add stuff that you personally know to be true. It has to be verifiable WP:V and from a reliable source WP:RS. Feel free to ask if you need help/info. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You cannot simply copy/paste text from another website onto Wikipedia as you just did with the 7/7 bombing response. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at British Association for Immediate Care. Please stop copy/pasting information from external sources as you did from this site. You will be blocked for a period if you continue. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 17:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Highland PICT Team has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Highland PICT Team. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Highland PICT Team has been accepted

Highland PICT Team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tannim101

Hello TheMouseMen, I was just wondering if you are connected with the editor Tannim101 in any way? And, if so, would you have a conflict of interest disclose with organizations like he has done on his userpage? You have both edited pages like BASICS Scotland, the various Journal of Paramedic Practice drafts, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Mulvaney, as seen using the Interaction Timeline tool. I'm just curious since you have both edited in a very niche topic area and then became involved with that very recent AfD.

I just want to clarify I'm not accusing you of doing anything wrong, and if anything, I wanted to thank you for your edits to Mulvaney's page which has led to improvements. Thanks so much! Bridget (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heya - yeah we have edited related articles so I follow their edits to see what they’re up to, I assume (as you note) they’re in the same country as me - presumably a similar field. They are also a pain for not explaining what their edits are often in the summary box!

Let me work out how to do the profile thing, as you’re right I have a COI with a College of remote medicine, I’ll put that there. Thanks!

Maybe I should stop following specific peoples edits? Is that weird? I feel like it looks like I’m checking their homework? TheMouseMen (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not too sure how to answer your questions - I feel you could probably make better judgements in those situations rather than me. Thank you for making the disclosure on your userpage though. Happy editing! Cheers, Bridget (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-) yeah maybe, I guess I’m too lazy to keep tabs on what’s changing on wiki, maybe I need to add more pages to my watchlist to see what’s happening.

Thanks for the user profile suggestion, I need to work out how to make it look more fancy. I’m not very good at finding templates! TheMouseMen (talk) 14:32, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

College of Remote and Offshore Medicine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, College of Remote and Offshore Medicine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. Currently, it has zero.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ladder approach

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ladder approach, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: College of Remote and Offshore Medicine (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Incredibly, 42 (!) citations, and yet I couldn't find a single source among the refbombing that meets the WP:GNG standard for notability. In case I'm wrong, the author is welcome to point out the three strongest secondary sources (newspapers, magazines, TV and radio programmes, books, etc.) that cover the college (not some indirectly related matters) in significant extent and depth. Please note also that some of the sources don't work, and LinkedIn and Wordpress blogs are user-generated and therefore not considered reliable. These citations should be repaired or replaced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:College of Remote and Offshore Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheMouseMen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Emergency Medical Retrieval Service into ScotSTAR. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tannim101 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imaginarium Monkey. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: College of Remote and Offshore Medicine (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:College of Remote and Offshore Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:College of Remote and Offshore Medicine

Hello, TheMouseMen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:College of Remote and Offshore Medicine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]