User talk:TheGoldAge

TheGoldAge, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheGoldAge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

WW1

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)dz[reply]

You seem to be making a habit of mass info dumps.Slatersteven (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe adding more information to an encyclopedia is more relevant to the reader than fixing broken links or gramatical mistakes. TheGoldAge (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read wp:cir, and wp:talk.Slatersteven (talk) 14:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read WP:CIA. TheGoldAge (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tere comes a point when CIA becomes an issue. I am telling you not to reach that point. You do actually have to start listening to people.Slatersteven (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And that people would be you? No, you are simply trying to be bossy. I am trying to discuss exclusively the subject at hand in order to reach a consensus or learn something new, while you are dropping sarcastic remarks like "Err", "A this stage I have to ask, have you even read the lede?", maybe you should start to read WP:CIR and drop the arrogance. TheGoldAge (talk) 14:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me, and every other user who has told you no.Slatersteven (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy told me to bring this to talk page, which I did, I shouldn't have reverted his edit on the basis that he didn't give me a reason for the disagreement, I was too rushy there, but I did bring it on the talk page. On the talk page he explained the reasons for his undo (over linking, too many pictures, etc), which I did address on the talk page. So I did listen to him, yet, Moxy wasn't hostile or sarcastic. TheGoldAge (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you reinsert it again I will report you, stop now you do not have a consensus.Slatersteven (talk) 11:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And read wp:3rr very very carefully, you can be edit warring even if you do not breach it, and you are.Slatersteven (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We discussed it on the talk page, you asked me if addressed it, I said I will and was about to, as I said in the description "will soon be edited to comply with Moxy's objections", what else is the issue? TheGoldAge (talk) 11:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TheGoldAge! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jr8825 • Talk 16:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Romania in World War II into History of Romania. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Democratic Union of Freedom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Democratic Union of Freedom. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Democratic Union of Freedom. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Democratic Union of Freedom. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Saksapoiss (talk) 22:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]