User talk:TheDibest
August 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Camera obscura without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Camera obscura, you may be blocked from editing. freshacconci (✉) 12:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Aesop
[edit]Hi; I've restored the text removed by you at Aesop. You don't seem to understand the essential requirement of a neutral point of view in articles. It's not our job as editors to decide what's "true" and what's "false" and eliminate the latter. We're supposed to represent all well-sourced, major points of view in the scholarship that directly pertain to our subject. Nothing more, nothing less, without preference or over-emphasis either way, and in due proportion. The notion that Aesop (if he existed at all) was African is one of many theories about his origins and ethnicity. Haploidavey (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)- If this continues your next block will likely be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alessandro de' Medici, Duke of Florence, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't believe your edit summary does not justify that content removal. Pleas discuss on talk:Alessandro de' Medici, Duke of Florence. See wp:BRD Thank you Adakiko (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tristão da Cunha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm AviationFreak. I noticed that in this edit to Academic art, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AviationFreak💬 16:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reverted anyway - Linda Nochlin is not some random blogger, etc. Johnbod (talk) 16:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)