Put new text under old text.-Unless you are following something up.
I generally archive my Talk Page-Around every 15 messages.
Please sign and date your entries-by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
I sometimes rename section headers-to help me navigate.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:The-G-Unit-Boss. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hey, this article was previously deleted because it apparently didn't have enough citation or links. I resolved that problem in this version. Now, you guys are saying the links are product links (which they're not or not meant to be, but who has time to argue). So, if I take the markabernathy.org link off does the article pass the test and get put back up? Researcherspecialist (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Researcherspecialist (talk • contribs) 17:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious. Although this project was not as well done as your projects, why was Too Rude deleted. The album had proper sources and all that was needed. I've made my share of contributions, but I still am not the greatest wikipedian, so can you help me out and explain. Siolent323 (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Undeletion
G, could you please userfy the article you deleted, Lord Stettin, into a userspace of mine? I am trying to update some of the Foundation series-related articles, and would like to see at least what it used to be. Thank you very much. —ScouterSig22:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey Boss, we desperately need some protection for Tha Carter III as anons are going ape shit editing and vandalizing. If you could protect it I would surely appreciate it, thanks. --Ayoleftyz (talk) 14:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
TheChronic has given you a bottle of Cristal! Cristal costs $350, and hopefully this bottle has made your New Year's Day better. Spread the spirit of the New Year by giving a bottle of Cristal to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Give a bottle of Cristal to someone else by adding {{subst:User:The Hybrid/Finger}} to their talk page with a friendly... wait...
Hope Jay-Z doesn't kill me for this. :) 19:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletation of articles
Would you mind deleteing all redirects to deleted articles when deleteing those articles?
And give the same reason for deleteing the redirects as for deleting the article.
Zarutian (talk) 04:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Shoot to Kill
this has nothing to do with Wikipedia, but do you have any idea when G Units Shoot to Kill album is coming out? I know it was supposed to come out on December 18 but got delayed, Ive been waiting for this album for a while and cant wait for it to come out, so do you have any info about it--Yankees10 (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me, I cant wait, no I didnt see him on MTV Cribs, I wanted to watch it though, but forgot that it was on.--Yankees10 (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
IP vandal refuses to leave; can you please protect the page?
Hi. Back on November 11th, you put up page protection to stop an IP vandal filling Talk:Bengalia with rants against the scientific community and what he perceives as censorship (by myself and others) of his revolutionary self-published scientific concepts. The editor in question has been sanctioned for sockpuppetry (Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/AzLehrer), and has repeatedly and egregiously violated WP:CIVIL, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:SPS, WP:OWN, and WP:3RR. The protection desperately needs to be restored. He logs in every day from a new IP (at 89.1.xxx.xxx or 82.166.xxx.xxx) and edits anonymously, signing his messages with a new pseudonym each month (he's used Pandur, Condor, Falco, and now it's "Anlirian"). Essentially all he does is complain how unfair it is that his postings should be deleted - because he absolutely DOES NOT BELIEVE that there are official Wikipedia policies, or that he has violated them - he is CONVINCED that I am making it all up solely to harrass him and silence his opinions, and that Wikipedia exists to allow anyone to post anything, however they like, so how DARE anyone delete his personal attacks and personal opinions, since the scientific community is full of "racists" and "ignoramuses" that refuse to acknowledge his genius. This has been going on for months now, and about the only thing that will help at this stage is if the article and its talk page are semi-protected for at least three months, if not longer. You can review the history there to see, but it's absurd to have to visit that article every day just to delete whatever his latest anti-censorship rant happens to be. Sure, it's a very minor and insignificant article, but Wikipedia should not have to tolerate crackpots simply because they WP:OWN tiny insignificant articles that no one ever reads. Thanks, Dyanega (talk) 17:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
