User talk:ThatOneJerseyDude

Welcome!

Hi ThatOneJerseyDude! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

African Americans in New Jersey

In this edit, you added a list of places in New Jersey with significant African American populations, but this is an article about African Americans in New York City. By your logic, we would also add places on Long Island and in Westchester and Rockland Counties, at the very least, and the list would become unwieldy. If you think an article on African Americans in New Jersey is merited (and I have no doubt that it is), please feel free to create it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Nagol0929. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, North Jersey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at North Jersey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Nagol0929 (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Union County is not in North Jersey, it's in Central Jersey. If you actually looked at a map then you would see it's located in the far northern central part of it. Stop reverting the edit back. ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "clear cut" definition of what constitutes "North Jersey". Your claim that it is not part of North Jersey, when the article has previously included it, represents your own opinion. You'll need to discuss the matter at the article's talk page to see if you can gain consensus for that opinion. (Be prepared to show sources discussing North Jersey that exclude Union County.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at North Jersey

Your recent editing history at North Jersey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Americans in New Jersey (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Americans in New Jersey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThatOneJerseyDude! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:African Americans in New Jersey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:African Americans in New Jersey. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fact

If you're going to mark a fact as disputed, it behooves you to discuss the matter at the article's talk page. Why do you dispute the fact? What evidence to you have to support your dispute? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it when I get home ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing. UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, you were warned for adding unsourced content, so you restored the content, this time with a valid source (thanks for that!) but then removed the source with an edit summary saying Removing source for something thats already obvious. Just because it's obvious to you (perhaps because you live in the area), it's not obvious to anyone else who doesn't, which is why Wikipedia has verifiability guidelines. Please follow them. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No I removed the content and then readded it because the demographics said so. Maybe CHECK THE SOURCES, before removing any edits I make and assuming they're "not sourced". ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 15:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what the page history (and the specific diffs I provided) shows. And to clarify, I did not change any of these edits, I'm just asking about the sequence of events. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I readded it with a source was because it would supposedly get removed if I didnt provide a source

But then again that dont matter because everything I add or remove doesnt have to have a citation next to it ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 15:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 15:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Americans in New Jersey has been accepted

African Americans in New Jersey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 14:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'all really fucking blocking me over minor ass edits? Get the fuck out of here. I'm creating another account. ThatOneJerseyDude (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's called socking and is expressly forbidden for avoiding a block. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #82407 is closed.

Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks). The UTRS software may lock you out for a day or two. Please use this time to review your talk page and the reasons for your block, and to consider how you will address these reasons. Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

clerking UTRS appeal #82450

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 20:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

clerking UTRS appeal #82508 is closed.

User is banned from UTRS for repeated Wikipedia:Threats of violence. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]