User talk:Thamjeedha

December 2024

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hai, how can I add citation? Thamjeedha (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can add citations to a source that complies with WP:RS. The link you used did not. MrOllie (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Applications of artificial intelligence. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Annh07 (talk) 11:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thamjeedha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked indefinitely from editing due to adding links that were considered spam. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or misunderstanding this may have caused.

I would like to explain that my intention was not to spam but to provide relevant and valuable content to enhance the articles. The links I added were meant to offer additional resources for readers seeking more information on the topic.

I believe there might have been a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the links. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that any contributions I make in the future are compliant with the policies.

I kindly request an appeal for unblocking. I will be more diligent in my future edits and ensure that all contributions are in line with Wikipedia's standards. I value the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and am eager to contribute positively.

Thank you for considering my appeal. I am willing to provide any further information or clarification if needed. Thamjeedha (talk) 05:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was written by an AI(85% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.