User talk:Tensieal

Paid editing

Hello Tensieal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tensieal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tensieal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~~~~ Theroadislong (talk) 17:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there @Theroadislong, i have disclosed that pretty openly - on my profile (User:Tensieal) and the teahouse page (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse?markasread=258275850&markasreadwiki=enwiki#c-David_notMD-20220930194100-New_article_submission_-_is_this_good_to_go_or_needs_more_edits?_(disclaimer,_af). Both were done prior to your notification.

I'll include {{paid|user=Tensieal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}, Apologies - wasn't aware of it. In any case, I've (hopefully) done my best to provide a neutral point of view (and actual independent third-party benchmarks to confirm that). Tensieal (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep Lake (Deep Learning) (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some sources don't mention the subject of the article. Many are primary sources. The definition of the subject is so unclear I'm uncertainly whether "deep lake" is a proper or common noun.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tensieal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning)

Hello, Tensieal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deep Lake (Deep Learning), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]