User talk:Teddycom

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Teddycom! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 17:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Population decline. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TheskylineofDortmund.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TheskylineofDortmund.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 06:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TheskylineofDortmund.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:TheskylineofDortmund.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 15:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hamburg Skyline.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hamburg Skyline.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed a similar issue with File:Rotterdam Skyline.JPG. Looking at the specification of that file I see two potential problems.

First of all, as the automated messages above imply you have not filled out all the information about who holds copyright in the Wikipedia format. This seems a bit of a bureaucracy and going against the encyclopedia that everyone can edit, but in the case of images this is essential. The problem is that most images that are around are made by someone, and according to many laws may fall under copyright protection i.e. we have to pay the owner of the copyright bigtime to use it, or face legal problems. Wikipedia want to avoid legal problems at all times and therefore is extremely strict with copyright.

Secondly you claim you made the images yourself. But according to copyright law this is only the case if you actually made the photographs you combined into these images yourself. Combining existing photographs does not exempt the collage from copyright protection of the originals.

Can you please carefully reconsider these images. Thanks Arnoutf (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Munich_Skyline.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Munich_Skyline.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vienna_Skyline.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Vienna_Skyline.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rotterdam_Skyline.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Rotterdam_Skyline.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Subway station dortmund.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Subway station dortmund.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of U-Bahn Dortmund

A tag has been placed on U-Bahn Dortmund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 13:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Westfalenpark dortmund-city.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Westfalenpark dortmund-city.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dortmund-subway.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Dortmund-subway.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dortmund skyline atnight.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Dortmund skyline atnight.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dortmund stadium.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Dortmund stadium.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kfc dortmund.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Kfc dortmund.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Latvian people, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop replacing referenced information with your own unreferenced figures. The user above has already asked you not to do this. If you continue to do this it may be considered disruptive editing. If you disagree with the figures, find a reliable source which lists the figures which you want to add. Valenciano (talk) 17:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you yet again, to please stop adding unreferenced and inaccurate info to Wikipedia? An example is your edit here:German and Ladin aren't official languages in Italy as shown in the Ethnologue report. I'm also disappointed that you continue to add incorrect population figures for the number of Latvians in Latvia, even ignoring the reference in there which is the latest census figures from the Latvian Central Statistics Bureau. Before making any further edits like that, I'd advise you to read WP:VERIFY especially Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence. Valenciano (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RTL2 Germany.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RTL2 Germany.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Your recent edit to the page Turks in Germany appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Kafka Liz (talk) 23:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username RA0808. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States – European Union relations with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States – European Union relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- _J.Logan`^t: 20:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turks in Germany. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Turco85 (Talk) 22:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States – European Union relations, you may be blocked from editing. - _J.Logan`^t: 17:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Europeanunion unitedstates relation.png

Thanks for uploading File:Europeanunion unitedstates relation.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

German language

I undid your changes to the article. You can change the number of native speakers only if you provide (newer) sources - the ones that are cited now don't support your edit! --Six words (talk) 07:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When changing articles, please make sure the sources you cite are reliable. http://www.weltsprachen.net/ seems to be a personal website, so it isn't an acceptable source. If you're unsure whether a source is or isn't reliable, you can ask for opinions on the article discussion page. Also make sure to include the source you're using in the article (see WP:CITE) - simply changing the number makes it look like you're trying to fasify sources! --Six words (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And don't falsify data as you have at List of languages by number of native speakers. Certainly don't edit war over it. — kwami (talk) 19:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring at List of languages by number of native speakers. When you're reverted for disrupting the article, perhaps you might want to actually read the article so you know what you're doing? The main columns all come from a single source. If you wish to add additional figures, they go in the column for additional figures. — kwami (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You can not do so many changes without discussion with other users. Your worked automatically has been reverted. Talk discussion first, then the consensus, later mass changes. Subtropical-man (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the article European Union. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at European Union. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U5K0 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 12 October 2011‎

If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turks in Germany

Hi Teddycom, I just wanted to message you to explain to you why your edits are being reverted. Although there are currently 1.6 million Turkish citizens in Germany, many sources, including the German Embassy, state that those whose origins are Turkish is about 3.5 to 4 million. Turco85 (Talk) 13:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dortmund

You gave a link as a reference for the population statistic which doesn't work for me. I'll wait a bit. Can you format it please, "bare urls" are not the best way, [url title], --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please let's discuss here or on the article's talk the source and the way to implement it in the article. I restore the article until then, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You reinstalled the reference, I still can't access it. Please provide the correct link and don't leave it as a "bare url". I'll wait a bit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Edit warring while abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (t) (e) 17:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment on the Berlin page

Hi - since you edited the Berlin page within the last couple months, I'm writing to ask if you'd like to weigh in on a current content dispute that has resulted in a request for comment. The issue, simply, is whether the Berlin article should include an image of the "Buddy Bears" or not. Thanks for your time, Sindinero (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Australian page

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SumomousefoxSumomousefox (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

8 October 2012

You have misrepresented the size of the Asian Australian population in 2011 as being 6%, 7%, and 6-8% at different times, directly contradicting the current sources which show it is 12%. The source you posted to the contrary was from 1995, but you represented it as being from the 2011 census.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SumomousefoxSumomousefox (talk) 01:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring, editing to push a point of view, changing content so that it does not reflect cited sources, removing sources without apparent reason, and adding spurious sources (e.g. a source dated 1995 to support your claims about an event which took place in 2011). Your own conviction that you are "right" does not over-ride what sources say, even if you are convinced those sources are wrong. I also see that you feel free to insert different figures for the same supposed statistic on different occasions, without any evident reason.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Teddycom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Teddycom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Teddycom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]