Jump to content

European Union–United States relations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rvv
Teddycom (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Multiple issues|refimprove =May 2010|update =June 2010}}
{{Multiple issues|refimprove =May 2010|update =June 2010}}


{{Infobox Bilateral relations|European Union – United States|European Union|United States|filetype=svg}}
'''Relations between the European Union – United States''' are the bilateral relations between the [[European Union]] (EU) and the [[United States|United States of America]] (USA). Due to the EU not having a fully integrated foreign policy, relations can be more complicated where the EU does not have a common agreed position e.g. EU foreign policy was divided during the [[Iraq War]].
'''Relations between the European Union – United States''' are the bilateral relations between the [[European Union]] (EU) and the [[United States|United States of America]] (USA). Due to the EU not having a fully integrated foreign policy, relations can be more complicated where the EU does not have a common agreed position e.g. EU foreign policy was divided during the [[Iraq War]].


Line 33: Line 32:
* 1991 outbreak of the [[Yugoslav Wars]], which found the Europeans again divided, and unprepared to present a unified policy.
* 1991 outbreak of the [[Yugoslav Wars]], which found the Europeans again divided, and unprepared to present a unified policy.
* 2003 [[invasion of Iraq]], which brought US-EU divisions out into the open.
* 2003 [[invasion of Iraq]], which brought US-EU divisions out into the open.

== Comparison ==

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
! {{flagicon|EU}} '''European Union'''
! {{flagicon|USA}} '''United States of America'''
|-
| '''Population'''
| 501,259,840
| {{uspop commas}}
|-
| '''Area'''
| 4,324,782 km² (1,669,807 sq mi)
| 9,826,675 km² (3,794,101 sq mi)
|-
| '''Population Density'''
| 115.9/km² (300.2/sq mi)
| 32/km² (83/sq mi)
|-
| '''Capital'''
| [[Brussels]] (''[[Brussels and the European Union|de facto]]'')
| [[Washington, District of Columbia]] (''de jure'')
|-
| '''Largest City'''
| [[London]] – 7,825,200 (12,300,000 Metro)
| [[New York City]] – 8,175,133 (18,897,109 Metro)
|-
| '''Government'''
| [[Supranationalism|Supranational]] [[parliamentary]] [[Federation]] (de facto)
| [[Federal republic|Federal]] [[constitutional republic|constitutional]] [[presidential system|presidential]] [[republic]]
|-
| '''Official languages'''
| [[Languages of the European Union|23 languages]] (''de jure'')
| [[English language|English]] (''[[de facto]]'')
|-
| '''Main Religions'''
| 64% [[Christianity]], 30% [[Irreligion|non-religious]], 3% [[Islam]], 0.25% [[Judaism]], 0.25% [[Buddhism]]
| 78.5% Christianity, 16.1% non-religious, 1.7% Judaism, 0.7% Buddhism, 0.6% Islam
|-
| '''GDP (nominal)'''
| $16.45 [[Orders of magnitude (numbers)#10−12|trillion]] ($33,052 [[per capita]])
| $14.256 trillion ($46,381 per capita)
|-
| '''Military expenditures'''
| $254,633 billion (1.4 % of GDP)
| $663,800 billion (4.7 % of GDP)
|}


== Trade ==
== Trade ==

Revision as of 20:51, 26 September 2011

Relations between the European Union – United States are the bilateral relations between the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (USA). Due to the EU not having a fully integrated foreign policy, relations can be more complicated where the EU does not have a common agreed position e.g. EU foreign policy was divided during the Iraq War.

History

The European Union and the United States have held diplomatic relations since 1953.[1] The relationship between the EU and the US is one of the most important bilateral relationships in the world. They are the biggest economic and military powers in the world (even if the EU does not yet have a common defense policy), they dominate global trade, they play the leading roles in international political relations, and what one says matters a great deal not only to the other, but to much of the rest of the world. And yet they have regularly disagreed with each other on a wide range of specific issues, as well as having often quite different political, economic, and social agendas. Understanding the relationship today means reviewing developments that predate the creation of the European Economic Community (precursor to today's European Union).

Key events in the evolving history of the relationship include the following:

  • Truman Doctrine, which saw US becoming militarily involved in Europe not soon after withdrawing.
  • Marshall Plan, which provided billions of dollars in aid for the reconstruction of European economies.
  • North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which provided western Europe with a security guarantee in the face of Soviet threats.
  • 1949 Berlin crisis, which marked true beginning of the cold war.
  • Korean War, during which Americans and Europeans differed on strategy.
  • McCarthyism, which raised alarms in Europe about levels of American anti-communism.
  • The 1954 French defeat at Dien Bien Phu, which precipitated a tumultuous French withdrawal from colonial Empire, and resentment at US failure to help.
  • The 1956 Suez crisis, in which perceived US betrayal of European allies caused considerable resentment, and led to British withdrawal from colonial Empire.
  • 1957 Treaty of Rome, which created European Economic Community.
  • Berlin wall
  • The 1962 Cuban missile crisis, which alarmed western Europeans not only because it took the world to the brink of nuclear war, but also because they were not fully appraised by the Kennedy administration.
  • 1966 French withdrawal from military structure of NATO, emphasizing French distrust of US foreign policy and international influence.
  • The Vietnam war, opposed by political and public opinion in western Europe, and which generated resentment in the US because of the lack of European support.
  • End of the Bretton Woods system 1971, brought about by the Nixon administration without reference to western European leaders.
  • Ostpolitik, which alarmed US because of West German outreach to East Germany.
  • 1973 Yom Kippur War, which created serious rift between Americans and Europeans.
  • 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
  • 1980 Moscow Olympics, the boycott of which won little European support.
  • 1990-91 Gulf war, which found the western Europeans deeply divided in the face of American military and political leadership.
  • 1991 outbreak of the Yugoslav Wars, which found the Europeans again divided, and unprepared to present a unified policy.
  • 2003 invasion of Iraq, which brought US-EU divisions out into the open.

Trade

Relations with
member states
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom

Euro-American relations are primarily concerned with trade policy. The EU is a near-fully unified trade bloc and this, together with competition policy, are the primary matters of substance currently between the EU and the USA. The two together represent 60% of global GDP, 33% of world trade in goods and 42% of world trade in services. The growth of the EU's economic power has led to a number of trade conflicts between the two powers; although both are dependent upon the other's economic market and disputes affect only 2% of trade. See below for details of trade flows;[2]

Direction of trade Goods Services Investment Total
EU to US €260 billion €139.0 billion €112.6 billion €511.6 billion
US to EU €127.9 billion €180 billion €144.5 billion €452.4 billion

Issues

EU-US Summits

Annual Summits are held between EU and US policy makers. When these take place in Europe, they have historically taken place in the country that holds the rotating Presidency of the European Union.

List of EU-US Summits:

  • April 25, 2010 Washington, DC (High Level Consultative Group on Development Meeting)
  • May 24–25, 2010,Madrid, Spain
  • November 3–4, 2009,Washington, DC
  • April 5, 2009 Prague, Czech Republic, (Informal Summit)
  • 2008 - Ljubljana
  • 2007 - Washington
  • 2006 - Vienna
  • 2005 - Washington
  • 2004 - Shannon
  • 2003 - Washington
  • 2002 - Washington
  • 2001 - Göteborg
  • 2000 - Queluz
  • 1999 - Washington
  • 1998 - Washington
  • 1998 - London
  • 1997 - Washington DC
  • December 3, 1995 Madrid, Spain,

Arms embargo on the People's Republic of China

Both the United States and the European Union as of 2005 have an arms embargo against China (PRC), put in place in 1989 after the events of Tiananmen Square. The U.S. and some EU members continue to support the ban but others, spearheaded by France, have been attempting to persuade the EU to lift the ban, arguing that more effective measures can be imposed, but also to improve trade relations between China and certain EU states. The U.S. strongly opposes this, and after the PRC passed an anti-secession law against Taiwan the likelihood of the ban being lifted diminished somewhat.

Boeing and Airbus subsidies

The two companies are the major competing aircraft manufacturers, and both Boeing and Airbus are accused of receiving forms of subsidy from the United States[3] and from some of the European Union member states respectively, which both sides have criticised each other for doing. The pressure for this issue to be resolved has increased as Airbus and Boeing are now nearly equal in commercial aircraft market share.

Defence commitments

The defence of Europe is assigned to NATO and Europeans are more averse to using military force, and paying for military force, than the US. This has frustrated the US who sees Europe as failing to support its side of the NATO operation in Afghanistan. Only a handful of European countries are reaching the NATO target for 2% of GDP going to defence.[4] Defence cooperation in Europe is often opposed by the UK which states it does not wish to undermine NATO or the US role in Europe, despite the US being supportive of Europe improving its capabilities.

Defence contracts

In March 2010 EADS and its US partner pulled out of a contract to build air refuelling planes worth $35bn. They had previously won the bid but it was rerun and EADS claimed the new process was biased towards Boeing. The European Commission said it would be "highly regrettable" if the tendering process did prove to be biased. There was substantial opposition to EADS in Washington due to the ongoing Boeing-Airbus (owned by EADS) dispute.[5][6]

Genetically modified food

Genetically modified food is another significant area of disagreement between the two. The EU has been under domestic pressure to restrict the growth and import of genetically modified foods until their safety is proven to the satisfaction of the populace. The US on the other hand is under pressure from its agricultural businesses to force the EU to accept imports, seeing the EU's restrictions as alarmist and protectionist.

Rendition

The Washington Post claimed on November 2, 2005 that the USA has several secret jails in Eastern Europe (also called black sites). Poland and Romania however have denied these allegations. Also, Central Intelligence Agency planes carrying terror suspects would have made secret stopovers in several West European countries since 2001. Belgium, Iceland, Spain, and Sweden have launched investigations. The Guardian calculated on November 30 that U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) planes landed about 300 times on European air ports. Most planes would have landed in Germany and the United Kingdom as a transit point to East Europe, North Africa (possibly Morocco and Egypt), or the Middle East (possibly Syria and Jordan). In the meanwhile, the European Commission, on behalf of the European Union, asked the US for a clarification. The EU has refused to confirm or deny the reports.[7][8][9][10][11]

Extraordinary rendition flights through Europe were investigated over a number of years by the European Parliament and it held a temporary committee on the matter. The EU has also opposed the use of the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and offered to host some former inmates when its closure was announced by the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama.

Death penalty

In the United States, capital punishment is a legal form of punishment, whereas all European Union member states have abolished the death penalty fully (excluding Latvia which has retained it for exceptional circumstances such as wartime only). Indeed, nearly all European states no longer use the death penalty. This causes problems with transatlantic relations because it may be illegal for an EU member to allow the extradition of a citizen to the U.S. if the death penalty is an option.

International Criminal Court

The U.S. is strongly opposed to the International Criminal Court (ICC), and has not signed up to it, though most states in Europe have. The U.S. fears that its soldiers may be subject to politically motivated prosecutions, so much so that it has signed many bilateral agreements with other countries in an attempt to avoid this.

Arab-Israeli conflict

In the Arab-Israeli conflict, both sides of the Atlantic usually act more or less in tandem, in regard to the approach to the Palestinian territories as well as other issues (such as the recent conflict in Lebanon). However, in general, the European Union is often more critical of Israel, particularly in issues of policy (such as the West Bank barrier), and has criticized Israeli military actions that the U.S. has supported. The U.S. has historically been a much more supportive ally, going so far as to even use its veto at the United Nations Security Council in Israel's support.

Iran and weapons of mass destruction

The United States has not ruled out the use of force against Iran regarding the Iranian nuclear weapons program. France, Germany and the United Kingdom have taken the lead to solve the issue diplomatically, while representing the interests of the United States in negotiations with Iran since the United States has had no official diplomatic relations with the country since 1979. Former UK Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, described military action against Iran as "inconceivable".[12]

Iraq War

The Iraq War not only divided opinions within European nations and within the U.S., but between European nations themselves, with some states supporting of military action, and some against. The European public opinion was staunchly opposed to the war. This caused a major transatlantic rift, especially between the states led by France and Germany[13][14] on the one hand, who were against military action, and the United States with United Kingdom and Poland, among others.[15]

Kyoto protocol

The European Union is one of the main backers of the Kyoto protocol, which aims to combat global warming. The United States which initially signed the protocol at its creation during the Clinton Administration, never had the measure ratified by the United States Senate, an essential requirement to give the protocol the force of law in the United States. Later, in March 2001, under President George W. Bush, the United States removed its signature from the protocol, leading to much acrimony between the United States and European nations. Recently, President Barack Obama, however, said that he planned on re-signing the protocol at a conference to be held in Copenhagen in December 2009, where the protocol will be renewed and its measures extended.[16]

Visa waiver reciprocity

The EU is requesting from the US reciprocity regarding the visa waiver program for all its members. The European Union has threatened with the possibility of imposing visas for American citizens that would extend to the entire EU.

Resolved issues

EU-US summit at Brdo Castle near Kranj in 2008

Banana wars

The EU and US had a long running dispute over the EU's banana imports.[17][18] As part of their international aid, the EU offered tenders on a first-come-first-served basis for bananas from countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. The US argued that this favoured local producers in former colonies of EU member-states, over US-owned corporations in Latin America. The Clinton administration responded by imposing heavy tariffs on luxury goods created in the EU.[19] Such goods included cashmere from Scotland and French Cognac brandy, made in the original constituency of then Prime Minister of France Jean-Pierre Raffarin. The Clinton administration then took the banana wars to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1999, when Chiquita made a $500 000 donation to the Democratic Party.[17] The two sides reached an agreement in 2001.[20]

U.S. steel tariffs

In 2002, the U.S. imposed steel tariffs to protect its steel industry. The European Union and other countries took up the issue with the WTO, which ruled that such tariffs breach its regulations. Subsequently, by December 2003, the tariffs had been lifted by the U.S. administration.

Delegations

The current EU ambassador to the US is João Vale de Almeida and the EU's embassy in Washington D.C. was the first overseas delegation of the EU to open.

The Transatlantic Economic Council was established between the US and EU in 2007 to direct economic cooperation between the two, it is headed by the US Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economic Affairs and the EU's Commissioner for Trade. A Transatlantic Free Trade Area has been proposed but it is only speculative thus far.

See also

References

  1. ^ "EU-US Facts & Figures". European Union External Action. Retrieved 7 July 2011.
  2. ^ European Commission
  3. ^ For specific subsidies, see "Industrial Subsidies and the Politics of World Trade: The Case of the Boeing 7e7" (PDF). Canada-United States Trade Center. p. 17.
  4. ^ "Is demilitarised Europe affecting operations in Afghanistan?". Reuters. March 1, 2010.
  5. ^ "Northrop and EADS exit tanker bid". BBC News. March 9, 2010. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  6. ^ "EU concern over end of tanker bid". BBC News. March 9, 2010. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  7. ^ "EU warned on 'secret CIA jails'". BBC News. November 28, 2005. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  8. ^ "Nordic states probe 'CIA flights'". BBC News. November 18, 2005. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  9. ^ "Spain probes 'secret CIA flights'". BBC News. November 15, 2005. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  10. ^ http://www.vrtnieuws.net/nieuwsnet_master/versie2/nieuws/details/051201CIA/index.shtml
  11. ^ De Standaard Online - Regering onderzoekt CIA-transport van gevangenen
  12. ^ US attack on Iran 'inconceivable' BBC News
  13. ^ Polls find Europeans opposed to the Irak war BBC News
  14. ^ Review of the translatantic rift at the time Brookings Institution
  15. ^ [1]
  16. ^ Doyle, Leonard; McCarthy, Michael (November 20, 2008). "US in from the cold". The Independent. London. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  17. ^ a b Barkham, Patrick (March 5, 1999). "The banana wars explained". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  18. ^ http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/myths-about-%E2%80%98banana-wars%E2%80%99/66863.aspx
  19. ^ http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/mar1999/trad-m05.shtml
  20. ^ "EU and US end banana war". BBC News. April 11, 2001. Retrieved May 2, 2010.

Bibliography

  • Luca Bellocchio,“Il futuro dei rapporti euro-americani e la fine del sistema internazionale”, in S. Giusti e A. Locatelli (ED.), L’Europa sicura. Le politiche di sicurezza dell’Unione Europea, Milano, Egea Bocconi, 2008, 185-205
  • Luca Bellocchio, Anglosfera. Forma e forza del nuovo Pan-Anglismo, Il Nuovo Melangolo, Genova, 2006.
  • Luca Bellocchio, L'eterna alleanza? La special relationship angloamericana tra continuità e mutamento, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2006

Further reading