User talk:Tech201805

Some pages I have tried to improve: Nginx, Amazon S3, Apache Cassandra,
Created: Amazon Elastic File System

Tech201805, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tech201805! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

SYSTAT (software) See also section

Your edit on SYSTAT (software) is at least misplaced. The section "See also" is a section to point to other articles on Wikipedia. No to throw down a random external link that point to a command, while the article is about a software package. The Banner talk 13:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, thank you for your information and feedback. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#"See_also"_section Tech201805 (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amazon Elastic File System has been accepted

Amazon Elastic File System, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TMG^talk 11:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amazon Athena (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etzedek24 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Overly technical, and sources are of questionable independence. Tech blogs are not reliable sources for an article like this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amazon Athena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amazon Athena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 18:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Amazon Web Services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ECS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Amazon products and services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IAM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon S3

Hey there. I see you have done quite a lot of work on the article about Amazon S3. I was considering doing a rewrite but wanted to make sure that you weren't working on one. I think the article has a lot of information that really shouldn't be in an encyclopedic article but want to hear what you think about it. We can move this to the talk page of the article if you have an interest on a collaboration. Thanks! PopularOutcast^talk2me! 02:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC) Feel free to improve it! i do not know if i will be able to help you.... but go for it. Tech201805 (talk)[reply]

Cool, thanks! PopularOutcast^talk2me! 19:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tech201805. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenkins (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EKS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Tech201805 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by some company. The reason given for block is: " There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text <nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".</nowiki>

Blocking administrator: MER-C (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I am not convinced you are unrelated to that editor. In fact, I'm all but convinced there's a relationship between the two accounts. If so, you are not permitted to edit until that other account is unblocked and you declare your relationship. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My edit are related to tech and i have never edited anything about cryptocurrency. Why should i suffer from others editings? Tech201805 (talk)

Please declare the exact relationship between you and Beincrypto. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any relationship with Beincrypto Tech201805 (talk)

This is definitely not accurate. We know you have both edited from the same IP address. Why might that be? That's not passive-aggressive, I can imagine reasons why this might be, and so it's a legitimate question which would convince another admin to lift the autoblock (or not). --Yamla (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we are sharing the same IP. Thats all. You can check my edits to look for any relationship or promotional. I am user just contributing Wikipedia in a technical way. Why should i proof my innocence if i have done nothing wrong? Tech201805 (talk)

Seems like it is possible to keep IP blocked but allow some registered users to edit: Wikipedia:IP block exemption Tech201805 (talk) 14:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is. You've seen WP:IPBE. Given NinjaRobotPirate's actions, it's unlikely you'll be hit again. If you are, though, that would be a good thing to request. It's really annoying when there's a vandal or spammer sharing your IP address and unfortunately, it's hard for us to tell what's going on. --Yamla (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tech201805 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Any of my edits are promotional, why should i be blocked?

Accept reason:

The autoblock seems to have timed out, and I think there's enough difference in both the edits and CU data that we can give the benefit of the doubt here. I've turned off Beincrypto's autoblock, which should let you edit without trouble. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I just try to improve wikipedia in a constructive way. Tech201805 (talk)

Your edit to Microservices

Referenced edit: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Microservices&oldid=891638715 . I don't understand why you did what you did. The page seems worse off now because the sentence is no longer grammatical. A really paranoid android (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at GitLab, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at GitLab. You have again added promotional content sourced to their own website, it is not acceptable, as per WP:BRD please explain on the talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No bare URLs in references

@Tech201805: In your recent edits, you added bare URLs as references. For example, <ref>http://example.com</ref> is a bare URL.

Bare URLs are not good because they provide no citation information and can be subject to link rot. References should include complete citation information, as in Wikipedia:Citation templates (see also: Help:Referencing for beginners). If you insist on inserting bare URLs, you should at least insert {{Cleanup bare URLs}} at the top of any article in which you insert bare URLs, so that other editors will be notified and will clean up the bare URLs with reFill, a semi-automated tool. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will check it. Tech201805 (talk) 15:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NATS Messaging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNCF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Hat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMQ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Linux kernel version history

Hello, Tech201805,

Thank you for creating Linux kernel version history.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A lead section would add useful context to this page. Perhaps this could duplicate some content from the original page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lineslarge}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lineslarge (talk) 16:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qcow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AES (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Uninterruptible power supply. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. I was inclined to assume good faith regarding your using the maker of a UPS'es website to state allegedly objective facts about them, but the fact that you've been warned in the past about such things complicates my ability to do so. You're welcome to re-add the information using a more objective reference. DonIago (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]