User talk:Tanishqsh

Welcome!

Hello, Tanishqsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Captive Of Thoughts, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk To Me

Thanks a ton Squinge (talk), I can finally edit articles, I just checked. One thing I wanted to know, How do we find articles on Wikipedia that need rectification, or those who are not abiding by laws?

And, can I now input my point of view at Article for Deletion Discussion? Thanks for your assistance.

I find articles that need attention largely by reading things and following links, and when I see things that need fixing I try to fix them. I also look at the "Recent Changes" page sometimes to see what's happening, and help with things that way - it's at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:RecentChanges and there's a link in the Tools section at the left of pages. And yes, as the creator of the article you can indeed contribute to the AFD discussion. Squinge (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rakhee Kapoor Tandon

Hello Tanishqsh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rakhee Kapoor Tandon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rakhee Kapoor Tandon

The article Rakhee Kapoor Tandon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Some notability is asserted, but looks like yet another blogger. There are almost no any sources that support the subject notability, beside being daughter of a prominent businessman. The link claiming her being "on of 25 most influential women in India" actually does not say anything like this. Hence, I am nominating this for deletion being promotional as well as not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Travis steffen

The article Travis steffen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject looks lacking notability. There is only one proper mention in Forbes and this mention is actually about what the subject posted and not about the subject itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rakhee Kapoor Tandon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rakhee Kapoor Tandon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakhee Kapoor Tandon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - NQ (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of a Arnub's show Barely speaking with arnub.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of a Arnub's show Barely speaking with arnub.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reet Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reet Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reet Sharma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello Tanishqsh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tanishqsh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tanishqsh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for message ~ Winged Blades. I have not been paid by the subject, however, I have been in her one of the spiritual hosting events, and thus know about the subject. Tanishq (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about any particular subject.I will re-request you to follow the guidelines at WP:PAID, for all articles written in lieu of payments(s) et al. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nisha Bhalla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nisha Bhalla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha Bhalla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]