Jump to content

Talk:Rakhee Kapoor Tandon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Support Keep

[edit]

Keep. If we were to talk about her personal achievement, the news links mention her being featured on India's Top 25 Most Influential Woman. She has also launched several campaigns with the hierarchical partnership with Yes Bank. Thus, she has got a fair coverage of leading news papers, authentic online media and other resources. Thus, I support to keep this page. Tanishq (talk) 10:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion

[edit]

Instantaneous social media/media trending is not a proof of notability. She doesn't have any significant individual achievements as evident from third party sources. Hence I support deletion of this article --Jishith (talk) 09:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a readily trending topic currently in India. If you google about her, you will see plenty of news links, both from authorized news channels as well as, private networks of internet media encompassing her eligibility. She was one of the top 25 most influential women of India.

I have duly provided the links and references and even cited the proper links. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag. Regards, Tanishq (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

Hi, I have mentioned the significance in the second paragraph about how she became nationwide known after being spotted at IPL Final. Added the references as well, confirming from the authentic pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanishqsh (talkcontribs) 22:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy deletion. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 22:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion declined

[edit]

 Candidates for speedy deletion patroller --- Arthistorian1977, I declined your speedy deletion nomination of this article with no prejudice against its deletion through WP:AfD if its notability is in doubt because A7 does not applies to articles with claim of significance even if the claim is unsupported by reliable sources. However, I will consider her notable per significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources Thanks! Wikigyt@lk to M£ 22:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]