User talk:Tafeax

Kuala Lumpur 2017

Some vandalism editing is taking place at the Wikipedia article of the 2017 Southeast Asian Games, mostly arose from controversies surrounding the games. What should I do?--Hongqilim (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keningau Airport

Your deleted the Keningau Airport is wrong because the future is really right in Keningau news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bevis Stone (talk • contribs) 05:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bevis Stone!. If you think those information are 'really right', kindly provide a credible citation or else I will revert it to standard format as per WP:Airport. From your talk page, you have records of adding self analysis and incredible information at Keningau page. Tafeax (talk) 12:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bevis Stone, it is not too late to add such information after the airport upgrade is complete. Currently, I found no news online that suggest that there will be an upgrade to Keningau airport. Maybe it is just a rumour circulating around your area. Cerevisae (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KLIA's Destination Flags

Hi, bit unfair to most readers to expect them to easily work out what flag represents what country. Prettiness, especially of this messy kind, is way down on our list of priorities in terms of communicating effortless information to readers. Tony (talk) 06:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kuala Lumpur International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emirates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KLIA vs. Subang

Please come to WT:AIRPORT#Edit war on whether Subang is KL to chime in. HkCaGu (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AirAsia and LCCT

Hi! I checked out your edit. I will state some things:

The corporate address is the LCCT, and not klia2. I thought that the LCCT and klia2 are the same thing, but apparently there is an older LCCT. In that case, the AirAsia office is in the LCCT.
I have reverted your removal saying that the info is in the infobox. In fact that's not true: The infobox does not give the complete information. It only says the head office is at KLIA and the registered office is at Petaling Jata. It does not say exactly which building the head office and registered office are located in.

WhisperToMe (talk) 03:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you write an article about a company, you want a photograph of the corporate head office. Since AirAsia's is in the old LCCT, we need a photo of that in the article. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A reference WhisperToMe used was outdated. Annual Report 2013 are made in 2013 while AirAsia still based in LCCT. They have currently shift all the operations and management office to klia2. I will revert your additional info as regard to AirAsia HQ on Kuala Lumpur International Airport page if you failed to cite the updated sources.Tafeax (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tafeax: I do want the most up to date sources. However... take a look at the list of AirAsia annual reports. 2014 has not yet been published. I have not found any source saying AirAsia's head office is switching buildings. While I understand you want the most up to date information, simply removing old information is not beneficial as people want to know the history of the company. Instead of removing old information, add the updates. For instance:

The head office was located at ABC,<ref>ABC</ref> until 2014, when it had relocated to WXY.<ref>WXY</ref>.

WhisperToMe (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to explain the problems with this rationale: "‎Low cost carrier terminal (LCCT): sources outdated and not suitable to put under airport History section" - In fact there should be a "headquarters/head office" sub-section of the corporate affairs section which should state where the headquarters is currently *and* formerly located. In addition you need a source specifically saying the corporate head office is now at klia2. If this source isn't found, there is no proof that the source saying it's at the LCCT is outdated. That means the removal is invalid and harms the article. If the company is upset that the article says it's headquartered at LCCT, it's the company's fault as it hasn't published the visiting address/information stating the headquarters has now moved. If the company wants its current headquarters acknowledged, it must show us the beef. WhisperToMe (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just found ‎http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/airasia-denies-funding-issues-in-moving-hq-to-klia2 and http://www.klia2.info/news/2014/airasia-new-hq-at-klia2 - The new KLIA2 head office facility has not yet been completed. WhisperToMe (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rapid Rail, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages North-South Line and Klang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indonesia–Malaysia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pontianak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garuda Indonesia to Nagoya

I change the service back to begins instead of resumes on the Soekarno-Hatta International Airport because Garuda Indonesia operated service to Nagoya in March 2012 from Denpasar not Jakarta according to the source. So CGK-NGO is a new route not a resumption. 71.12.206.168 (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minangkabau International Airport

Hi! Can you revert the Indonesian IP's edit on this airport? I'm out of 3RR for another 13 hours. HkCaGu (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Tafeax (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KUL Destinations Map

Hi, you recently reverted my edit adding a map of KUL destinations, saying it was, "unnecessary map and inaccurate”. I double checked the map and admittedly there were a couple of issues that have since been corrected. However I disagree with your assertion that it it is “unnecessary” and believe that this is against community consensus as multiple editors have added my maps or gave positive comments in the cases where I added them myself. This importance, in my opinion, arrises from the fact that they provides an easily readable summary of the information that is otherwise contained in the long and difficult to read list of destination cities. Such maps are found on many of the word’s major airports (LAX, LHR, JFK, DXB, BKK, AYT etc.) and so adding it to KUL would also ensure consistency between these pages. Based on this I would like you to consider restoring this map on the KUL page. --Macadamia1472 (talk) 10:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Destination map are nice but redundantly informative. I would agree the inclusion of the map if it accessible to be amended. Being an svg file, it seems difficult for editors to amend the map in case of new route or cessation. Other than that, the map are exaggerated. Let say one airline serve Moscow or Beijing, the whole Russian and China map will be coloured. It gives a misleading impression. People might tend to compare numbers of destination based on the map, instead of the exact destination. In other case, the map can be inaccurate in sense there are numbers of small countries that can't be seen from the map. Previously, KLIA does have destination map, however it has been removed (not by me). Nobody seems to against that. After all, destinations map is nice but misleading. Tafeax (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Macadamia1472: I'm also against the inclsuion of these maps. Furthermore, there's no consensus for doing so. I'd suggest to gain consensus first at WT:AIRPORTS and WT:AIRLINES.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AirAsia

The wiki title is AirAsia not AirAsia Berhad

The airline owner says “I am the leader of this company, and I have to take responsibility. That is why I am here,” he told reporters at the Surabaya airport Tuesday evening after meeting relatives of the passengers and crew of the downed plane. He added, “Even though we don’t know what’s wrong, the passengers were on my aircraft, and I have to take responsibility for that.”

Brand identity is very important to an airline, why does Tafeax think the incident has no relevence to the article in clear contrast to the owner of the airline - justify deletion

Mardijker (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^[1]

I understand your eagerness to add Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 on AirAsia wiki. AirAsia page was referring to Malaysian's AirAsia Berhad (you can see the name from the first paragraph and its stock exchange number in Bursa Malaysia). Tony Fernandes 'presence' on this incident due to his strong image which associated with AirAsia brand. So by saying 'I am the leader of this company' would imply that he is the leader for AirAsia Group which consist of AK, FD, QZ, D7 etc. After all, QZ8501 clearly belongs to Indonesia AirAsia which the aircraft, PK-AXC was registered in Indonesia. Furthermore, the majority of the crew (except French co-pilot) are Indonesians hired by Indonesia AirAsia. The incident can be added into AirAsia wiki if the flight number start with AK and the aircraft registration start with 9M-***. Tafeax (talk) 12:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mardijker! I also found that you keep adding incidents & accidents on AirAsia page. None of the stated incidents/accidents related with AirAsia or being notable. Please find on type of aviation incidents & accidents that fulfil the criteria on WP:AIRCRASH. Thank you.Tafeax (talk) 12:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tafeax! I also found that you keep zealously removing historical information on AirAsia page. You interpretation of Tony Fernandes statement indicates your weak understanding of English and English Grammar. Does this explain why you are deleting information benignly. As you confirmed you are not an Airasia employee or contractor could you confirm if you are a native reader and writer of English. Thank you Mardiyker 12:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please find on type of aviation incidents & accidents that fulfil the criteria on WP:AIRCRASH. Thank you.Tafeax (talk) 12:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see AirAsia QZ8501: mentions of crash being removed from Wikipedia sites from the UK newspaper The Independent. There seems to be an implication in the newspaper article that our article is being edited on behalf of AirAsia. In short, could you answer the question: Are you a paid editor, or do you have a WP:COI on the article? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. I'm purely independent editor focusing on accuracy of aviation fields around South East Asian region. I removed all three incidents & accidents from AirAsia page as QZ8501 accident and AirAsia Zest overshoot incidents does not belong to AirAsia, while an AK5218 overshoot in Kuching Airport did not comply WP:AIRCRASH. Tafeax (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tafeax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LouiseS1979 (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bananasoldier (talk) 03:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tafeax. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Bananasoldier (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bananasoldier! Tafeax (talk) 04:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse Badge

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

^†2†ťəäçħ ^†4†ӛṿəř 21:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tafeax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 14:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

2017 Southeast Asian Games at 23 June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Southeast Asian Games, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you! Boyconga278 (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boyconga278 How disruptive was my edit? Who did a disruptive editing? Please use talk page of this article to get consensus. Link to 2019 is ridiculous as no host was announced yet. Again my stand on listing participation nation was considering this is a small games compared with Olympics and Asian Games which needs a qualification. Traditionally, only athletics and swimming needs a qualification to SEA Games. You should look at your talk page to see how many people complain on vandal you did. Again, please use talk page of such article if you need something to be removed or added. Tafeax (talk) 06:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summaries

Please stop using misleading edit summaries, such as this edit, this edit,this edit, and this edit. None of those edits bear any resemblance to what you say you did in the summaries. Thank you AgustinusHal (talk) 04:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate, nothing you said make sense and related with edits example you provide. I removed this edit. Then you edit something which unrelated with my edit and leave a summary 'No charter on Ural Airlines for Alina Salimgareeva birthplace, and unauthorised edits by Tafeax can cause of lack of seasonal.' I don't get you and and how do you know Ural Airlines have charter flights from Vladivostok, Yeketerinburg, Ulfa to Batam, Indonesia? Could you provide proof? Tafeax (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just go through your user and talk page. You sound like a bogus. Why you claim yourself as administrator? Why you copy someone else profile? Sorry you are a not credible editor to warn me. Tafeax (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, the person seems to like to throw random accusation around without foundation. He has been warned. Hzh (talk) 08:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/01/business/international/airasia-tony-fernandes-responds-to-crisis-with-quick-compassion.html?_r=0

Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Int'l Airport

You didn't accept my edits on Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Airport page, i'm just edit/delete some words which doesn't have references. Those informations probably was just hoax, and to keep the informations is true, i delete some of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.79.33.210 (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I never edit a single word at Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Airport. You engage with wrong person. Tafeax (talk) 11:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hainan Airlines HGH-XIY-CDG

Please note that Hainan Airlines domestic and international flights operate out of different terminals at XIY with domestic flights at T2 and Int'l flights at T3. Citydude1017 (talk)

My concern was this flight using one flight code HGH-XIY-CDG which is a direct flight and it use the same aircraft (as per Flightradar24). Despite it arrive and depart from different terminal, it is still a direct flight. Tafeax (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to take a look at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports/Archive_13#.22Directness.22_of_beyond-hub_flights_by_Mainland_Chinese_airlines. A new discussion has started at WT:AIRPORTS. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Southeast Asian Games for logo at 1 September 2015

I asked do you know about the Southeast Asian Games in 2017 not? You should consider the logo of Southeast Asian Games in 2017 on their contribution is? Boyconga278 (talk) 04:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Institute of Neo Education (iNED)

Hello, Tafeax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Institute of Neo Education".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kota Kinabalu International Airport page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 2015 ASEAN School Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pak Lodin

Tafeax & CatcherStorm, FYI: I reported Pak Lodin at WP:AIV and WP:AN/EW. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89: Noted. Will continue to revert this guy's vandalism until an admin finally blocks him. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why it took so long for admin to block this fella? Sigh... Tafeax (talk) 07:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Sri Petaling Line

@14.192.210.127 Hello there. This is my explanation on why we should remove Sri Petaling Line from Klang Valley Rail Transit System and represent it as a single line with two branches under Ampang Line. I know many of you eager to maintain Sri Petaling Line since it is reflected in this well-circulated system map. However, we mustn't take this map as the only authority. There are a lot of sources and authorities that imply the 'maroon' line has been merged with Ampang Line. Here is my argument;

File:Klang Valley Rail Transit Map.pdf

1) Prasana Berhad as Rapid Rail parent company, in its website clearly stated 'Established in 1998 and operational since 2002, Prasarana is the asset owner and operator of the country’s two LRT networks and the KL Monorail...'[1] and '...to place all three rail operators of Prasarana Malaysia Berhad (Prasarana) – Ampang Line, Kelana Jaya Line and Monorail Services – under one administrating umbrella.'[2] They addedd '...officially took over the assets and operations of Star-LRT and Putra-LRT; and changing the name to Ampang Line and Kelana Jaya Line respectively.'[3] On the other page, Prasarana specifically highlight the fleet of Ampang Line. Nothing in the statement (or even the website) mentioned about Sri Petaling Line which existed during Star-LRT period. Perhaps, the website only provides three contact details as regard to Ampang Line, Kelana Jaya Line and KL Monorail Line. Again, Sri Petaling Line is non-existence.

2) Malaysia's Ministry of Transport (MOT) only recognized 5 types of LRT services namely KJ Line, Ampang Line, Monorail Line, KL Express and KL Transit from 2011 until today. This is reflected in every quarterly statistic. [4] On 8 February 2013, Minister of Transport said (translated into English) '...Sungai Besi LRT Station is the 11th station from a total of 25 stations of the LRT Ampang Line, recording the highest number of daily users.' [5] during the launching of new 'Park n Ride' facility at Sungai Besi LRT Station. Clearly, the above map is wrong as Sungai Besi Station is regarded as part of Ampang Line.

3) Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD), a Malaysian statutory body concerning land public transport had never mentioned Sri Petaling Line in their 2011[6], 2012[7] and 2013[8] annual report. Only in 2010[9] report SPAD include a map which resemble the above map despite saying 'As the central planner of the country’s land public transport, we continue to help conceptualise, implement and extend the current rail network to incorporate the many new lines that are in progress. Two such examples are the Kelana Jaya and Ampang LRT line extension projects.' Why don't SPAD said 'Sri Petaling Line extension project' to reflect the map in the first page of the report? For the record, 2010 annual report was the last 'factually inaccurate LRT map' used by such authoritative statutory body. No annual report being uploaded beyond 2013 for unknown reason.

4) In Rapid KL website, only 3 rail routes are shown whereby all station under Ampang Line had orange coloured. Maroon for KJ Line and light green for Monorail Line.[10] Nothing depicted Sri Petaling Line whatsoever. On other occasions, Rapid KL has said that 'The Ampang Line Extension starts from Sri Petaling Station and passes through Kinrara, Puchong, and ends at Putra Heights. The extension is 18.1km long with 12 new stations. Combined with the existing line, the total length of Ampang Line after the completion of the LRT Line Extension Project will be 45.1km.' [11] [12]

5) It is believe that the above 'factually inaccurate LRT map' was created and uploaded by MRT Corp,[13] the developer and asset owner of the Mass Rapid Transit project. However, MRT Corp does not have authority or power to manage or represent other service providers like Rapid KL. For that, I assume the MRT Corp exaggerated the map or the graphic designer had oversee the line merger or even MRT Corp itself didn't know about the merger.

With the above arguments, I will remove anything that concerning Sri Petaling Line (the article has been merged in Wikipedia) in order to adhered and uphold Wikipedia's reliability policy and integrity. I must say that a map does not have any authority to imply the existence of such line. Luckily, towards the end of typing this argument, I've found the most 'important' evidence for you. A map by Rapid KL with single-colour for 'both' line.[14]. Please help me to mitigate this confusion and false information. Your cooperation is highly appreciated. Tafeax (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tafeax Hi, your reference is incorrect and contradict on current network display map at the Rapid KL's stations & SPAD website. The rail map that you are refering to is outdated and high posibility has been used on or before 2010. 1. Sri Rampai station tagged still under construction. Sri Rampai station opened since 22 Dec 2010. http://www.myrapid.com.my/news-events/media-releases/2010/sri-rampai-station-be-opened-friday 2. Ampang Line has been rename by their dedicated service route and also on station signage on the lines. For public usage and to avoid confusion between lines, both services have their own name. You unable to find Ampang Line name on Sri Petaling service route from Cheras station until new opened Kinrara BK5 station and until Putra Heights which expected in operation end of March 2015. Ticket Vending Machine, station signage, rail map showed Sri Petaling Line as one main line together with Ampang Line. However, record on internal/project/media/official documents still refer to Ampang Line as one system network. 3. LRT Extension Project stations have no name on the rail map. STN01 STN02. Four new stations for the Ampang LEP opened since end October 2015. http://www.myrapid.com.my/media-centre/media-releases/2015/commuters-get-one-month-free-ride-4-new-lrt-stations 4. All LRT station have their finalised name and has been used on current Rapid KL rail map at the station & website which include the latest service on BRT Sunway Line. 5. KTM Electrified Double Tracking Project. Sentul extension to Batu Caves completion on Q1-2010. http://transitmy.com/2010/07/28/ktm-komuter-service-to-batu-caves-to-open-29-july-2010/ 6. KTM Electrified Double Tracking Project. Seremban extension to Sungai Gadut completion on Q1-2011. http://ipai-ans.blogspot.my/2011/05/now-opening-ktm-komuter-senawang-sungai.html And before 2016, KTM launched new electrified train shuttle service as KTM Komuter Southern Sector from Seremban until Gemas. However, integrated rail map yet to be updated by SPAD. 7. ERL Extension Project to KLIA2. KLIA2 ERL station opened on 02 May 2014. http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2014/04/22/erl-service-to-klia2-opens-on-may-2-rail-company-giving-away-1000-free-trial-rides/ 8. My final word is please help to update the latest info on Wikipedia and you reference can be updated under History section. Most of new Wiki contributor have their own latest info however unable to post correctly due to behaviour by senior Wikipedian. Think positive and teach them to become a Wikipedian as you now before you leaving this world.

Outdated rail map: http://www.myrapid.com.my/lrt/map

Updated rail map: http://www.myrapid.com.my/getting-around/klang-valley-integrated-rail-transit-map

You are confused because you did not understand and not follow the latest info. You argument already make other Wikipedia reader & contributor confused with your most 'important' evidence which actually outdated since 2010. We are now in 2016 and you had missed a lot. No one will help you & your totally false information. This is your time to have a rest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.192.214.148 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 9 January 2016

@ 14.192.214.148 (talk • contribs) Hello. You have give me the so-called updated version of map. As I said, map is deemed as the 'most important source' for you. However, it wasn't the case for me or even Wikipedia. I've presented a lot of sources from Prasarana (owner), Ministry of Transport, SPAD and Rapid Rail which showed that SP Line and Ampang Line has been combined into one line. As per WP:SOURCE, my above mentioned sources are primer and has merit. I can't understand the co-relation of this dispute with KTM Electrified Double Tracking Project and ERL Extension Project to KLIA2, motioned by yourself. You also seems to include WP:SELFPUBLISH to counter my argument. The issue here, how do you invalid the official report, speech and publication by only referring to this map [15]? On another note, please be wise on choosing words because by saying ' ...you leaving this world ' can amount to personal attack WP:PERSONAL. --Tafeax (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have to educate to new contributor. Delete on the line to avoid confusing among other. Have you ever visit to the new extension on SP Line stations. No, you don't. Your outdated info not sync to the current info. Your reference only based on media electronic your own PC. Your presented statement "I've presented a lot of sources from Prasarana (owner), Ministry of Transport, SPAD and Rapid Rail which showed that SP Line and Ampang Line has been combined into one line." Are you thinking Prasarana same like SMRT? DO you think MOT ever visit the SP Line station and change why SP Line? Have you ever counter to SPAD with regard the SP Line map. Ampang line is one of Rapid Rail system previously named as STAR Lrt. They have 2 lines. the SP LIne map It can be found on the new CSR train dynamic rail map, station rail map, TVM rail map. Elaborate the info until you got the answer. you might be good at other places, but not here. Your argument will not last longer. Prasarana have their own active Wikipedian from various department. I'm the one from more than 7000 staff. Forward your argument to https://www.facebook.com/myrapid or https://twitter.com/MYRapidKL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.192.214.148 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 9 January 2016

Again, you are referring to maps and avoiding WP:PRIMARY sources that I've found. I don't have to stay in London to edit London Underground as long as I have credible sources to edit the information. If you work with them, the you should ask your superior to add SP Line on this [16]. Why only add SP Line on the train or station but avoiding it on their official website? Furthermore, why they don't name the extension project as Sri Petaling Extension Project considering it is done at SP Line and originated from Sri Petaling Station? Please sign your posts on talk pages. Thank you. -- Tafeax (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IT is because ampang line and sp line collectively refer to ampang line lrt system. LRT system and LRT line is different. just read further on their facebook and you will know the correct info. there is no documented info on rapidkl prevoiusly a company and now as a brand name. it is same situation as AG line or SP line. some info are confidential therefore info publih to public via media might mislead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.192.214.148 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 9 January 2016

So we are dealing with two different thing Line and System. Thus I found my edit was correct because the article interest circumventing on the line not the system. While you should know renaming Ampang Line and Kelana Jaya Line to Ampang LRT and Kelana Jaya LRT was wrong because the said article title refers to the line. Sri Petaling Line's article has been removed from Wikipedia since 2007. If you interested to create another article on those system, please go ahed. It is clearly stated that Ampang Line consist of two routes namely Ampang and Sri Petaling. Both routes should be of the same colour because it was under one umbrella line, the Ampang Line. --Tafeax (talk) 07:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2001 Southeast Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merdeka Square. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tafeax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

User:Tafeax 2 reported to WP:UAA

There's this user impersonating you. I've already reported to WP:UAA. HkCaGu (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! --Tafeax (talk) 08:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indira Gandhi International Airport

Regarding this [17], see WP:BURDEN. I'm not gonna do other's work for them. It's amazing what you can learn by simply reading the policies and guidelines.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read this WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM as well. I believe the IP editor has acted in good faith, leaving an honest edit summary. Tafeax (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the capital of Malaysia

Hi there. With regards to the revert in the infobox section of Malaysia - indeed there's no doubt that Kuala Lumpur is the capital while Putrajaya is the seat of government. In fact, I made the original edit to separate these entries, since "Capital and largest city - Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya" was neither accurate nor concise. It was with these in mind that I made a further edit, which was reverted. I was wondering whether it would be more appropriate if Putrajaya only appears in the footnote section? In other cases of similar arrangements, such as in Benin, Bolivia, Georgia, Netherlands and Philippines, the constitutional capitals take precedence, while the seats of government feature in the footnotes.

I do have to admit that I am not from Malaysia and therefore I am no expert on this matter. The Constitution of Malaysia does refer to Kuala Lumpur as the federal capital - "until Parliament otherwise determines". Is there a parliament act/decree suggesting that the situation in Malaysia is significantly different from the cases above? Has Putrajaya been elevated to a higher status? Either way, is there a way to properly source it?

As a matter of personal preference, I favor what they did with the Netherlands and the Philippines articles - as they both look good without sacrificing accuracy. I would still love to know what you think regarding this rather trivial matter. Thank you.

--Dvl007-TheRaven (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I understand your concern, it doesn't look appealing and nice. But on top of that, Putrajaya deserved to be highlighted on infobox for being the seats of 2 main branch of the government; The Executive and The Judiciary. On the other hand, Kuala Lumpur has been stated on the Constitution as the capital of Malaysia which seat The Legislative only. From this point of view, what makes Putrajaya to be lesser important than KL? Both are very important and powerful. Perhaps, the footnotes wrongly describe Putrajaya as the 'seat of goverment' whereby a government here, should referred to the establishment of all three branches; The Executive, The Judiciary and The Legislative. In this case, both Putrajaya and KL are the seat of the goverment. Personally, I prefer "Capital and largest city - Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya" because both municipality located in the Greater Kuala Lumpur, so there is no issue on accuracy since Putrajaya is also part of the largest city. I can't compare or to find similarity with other capital cities because each country have different circumstances as regard to capital city. Furthermore, an infobox must be keep simple and away from clutters (footnotes) WP:INFOBOXREF. Thanks. --Tafeax (talk) 06:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport, you may be blocked from editing. WP:AVIMOS might help you to better understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.164.41.76 (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide further details on why you add this: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.164.41.76 (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AirAsia Group destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of destination maps

Hi. I've noticed that you've recently been deleting numerous destination maps on various airport pages recently. The link you provide to the past discussion on this topic did not have a clear consensus regarding whether or not to delete these maps. Also, that discussion was started based on large destination maps so why are you deleting the small thumbnail images? These are great resources to include on airport pages. Please stop your actions and undo your edits or further action may need to be taken. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 04:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Large or small is not the issue on that discussion. You should read the discussion whereby editors questioned on maps itself, not the size. My concern was airlines destination keep on changing. How other editors could gain access to jpg file in order to reflect such changes? I will not undo my edits since those maps only create clutters, misleading (incorrect destinations) and looks like a travel guide.--Tafeax (talk) 05:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If new destinations are added or if certain destinations are removed, the map will need updated and it always gets done from the pages I've witnessed with these maps. Usually, the user who uploads the jpg image is the one to update the maps. Destination maps are not misleading, they need updated just like the destination tables need updated constantly. Nothing's different. Also, I did read the discussion and there was no consensus whether to have maps or not. Therefore, you cannot just delete these maps based on your opinion of them. Start a thread at WP:Airports yourself and discuss with other editors. I noticed in the link you provided, you did not leave one comment on this topic. For now, I have reverted your edits until a clear consensus is reached. *AirportUpdater* (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rapid Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sentul. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Neo Education (iNED) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Institute of Neo Education (iNED) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tafeax, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Tafeax. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Institute of Neo Education (iNED) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Would you like to provide your input at this discussion regarding references and the Airlines and destinations tables? Thank you! — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 23:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tafeax. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1

The 3rd Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup had now arrived on Selangor! Pack your bags and your laptop, and meet some fellow Malaysia Wikipedians in the meetup!

Date: Sunday, 11 December 2016
Time: 12:00 - 2:00 pm
Venue: Sudo Brew, 7 Jalan SS 22/11, Damansara Jaya, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3°7′54.1″N 101°37′16.4″E / 3.131694°N 101.621222°E / 3.131694; 101.621222)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for a special session to discuss ms.wikipedia.org (subject to enough number of participants)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page or at the Facebook event page. (Delivered: 07:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC))

Thank...

Thank you for your remind. I understand and will not making mistakes next time, really thanks. Kingsley wan (talk) 07:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ASEAN Civil Service Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ASEAN Civil Service Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASEAN Civil Service Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 ASEAN University Games

The article 2016 ASEAN University Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable event, fails WPSsports event

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Athletics at the 2015 ASEAN School Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athletics at the 2015 ASEAN School Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athletics at the 2015 ASEAN School Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 ASEAN University Games

The article 2016 ASEAN University Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Events at the 2015 ASEAN School Games

Template:Events at the 2015 ASEAN School Games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Figure skating at the 2017 Southeast Asian Games) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Figure skating at the 2017 Southeast Asian Games, Tafeax!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 2

The 4th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Selangor, and you are invited!

Date: Saturday, 25 February 2017
Time: 11:00 am - 1:00 pm (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: Menara Sunway (check page for venue/room update), Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3°4′8.4″N 101°36′36.6″E / 3.069000°N 101.610167°E / 3.069000; 101.610167)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

→ To collaborate between Wikipedia Malaysia User Group and Sunway Group, a large corporation in Malaysia.
→ To create Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects)'s articles and edit/improve articles on the spot.

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 11:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC))

Invitation to the Wikipedia Johor Meetup 2

The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time in Johor. Since it is at holiday, check it out if you have time!

Date: Saturday, 18 March 2017
Time: 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: Al-Haji Grand Restaurant, Jalan Austin Heights 8/2, Taman Mount Austin, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia (1°33′43.2″N 103°46′34.6″E / 1.562000°N 103.776278°E / 1.562000; 103.776278)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquirers, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC))

Your draft article, Draft:Institute of Neo Education (iNED)

Hello, Tafeax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Institute of Neo Education".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 02:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Wikipedia Kuala Lumpur Meetup 2

The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Kuala Lumpur!

Date: Saturday, 22 April 2017
Time: 6:00 - 8:00pm (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: FEEKA Coffee Roasters, Jalan Mesui, Bukit Bintang, Kuala Lumpur (3°08′55″N 101°42′30″E / 3.1487°N 101.7084°E / 3.1487; 101.7084)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

→ To talk about the past Wikimedia Conference 2017 in Germany, Creative Commons, Malay Wikipedia and the upcoming Wikipedia East, Southeast Asia & Pacific Conference 2018 in Indonesia.
→ Forming a Wikipedia Malaysia User Group, coordinating East Malaysia-related affairs and training newcomer Wikipedia editors.
→ And a lot more!

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by QianCheng. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please remove your name here. (Delivered: 06:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC))

About this

I have read this https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Malaysia&oldid=426827180#Alternate_scripts

The conclution from this is Other script CANNOT at the top just like Kaydengyap edit at January.Although that, I strongly suggest to keep alternative script that in the station at other name.I know that are not OFFICIAL LANGUAGE because of the policy.But since other race compose the Malaysia, I think alternative script is important too.... Maybe not at the header but at least a small small place in other place ok too...

So that I think this mode that I do can continue.

So what is your opinion?(about the station)

[[User:*angys*|<span style="background:#000070;border:1px pink solid;box-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple;color:silver;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px white;border-radius:999px"> angys </span>]] (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. If you read the discussions properly, a consensus has been reached on this matter (on not using alternative scripts). Thus, it was reflected on WP:MOSMALAYSIA main page. I hope you can respect such rules. Being an official language or not, wasn't an issue. For example, Māori is one of official languages in New Zealand. But this was not reflected in every New Zealand-related article. Tafeax (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok loh, do whatever you like.I already respect that inequal rule and the alternative script will disappear from Klang Valley Station.

[[User:*angys*|<span style="background:#000070;border:1px pink solid;box-shadow:2px 2px 2px purple;color:silver;text-shadow:1px 1px 2px white;border-radius:999px"> angys </span>]] (talk) 14:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tafeax. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tafeax. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FlyGlobal

The article FlyGlobal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

small charter airline--no regular routes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Your edit to 2001 Southeast Asian Games has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 01:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KLIA statistics

Template:KLIA statistics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/01/business/international/airasia-tony-fernandes-responds-to-crisis-with-quick-compassion.html?_r=0

[1]