Jump to content

User talk:THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

The Biography Master writes a biography about a famous person

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 08:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:32, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Google searches are not references - nothing to show any notability at all
KylieTastic (talk) 11:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest?

[edit]

Hello there. Creating a new article from scratch is one of the hardest tasks anyone can do on Wikipedia. I sense that your work at Draft:Nikka Starr might indicate you have a Conflict of Interest, and that you might well know, or even be, the person you have photographed and are trying to promote here on Wikipedia. If so, please ensure you declare your connection, clearly, on your userpage. If a person is genuinely notable, another unconnected editor is highly likely to create such as page. Please only include personal details is already published in the public domain by reliable, independent sources.

Please do not attempt further editing without first declaring your connection, if any, to this subject.

And if you are in receipt of payment of any kind to promote this person, please read and follow this mandatory policy: WP:PAID.

Please also stop resubmitting your draft article for review without making genuine improvement to sourcing and referencing. If you were told it is not adequate, simply carrying on resubmitting it will simply result in it being rejected and probably deleted. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Nikka Starr

[edit]

Draft:Nikka Starr, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nikka Starr and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Nikka Starr during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 14:20, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Writing biographies

[edit]

Hello THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER. I have deleted the draft you wrote about Nikka Starr because there was sensitive content within the draft which violated Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy (BLP). The BLP policy is very important; essentially, it states that Wikipedia takes such biographies very seriously, and all information about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia must be supported by a citation to a reliable source, and any content which does not have such a citation may be removed. Please do not restore the content. It appears that the subject of the draft probably isn't notable enough for Wikipedia at this time. I would recommend spending some time editing a different subject instead. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page, and I would be happy to answer anything. Mz7 (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 01:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can i write a biography for a famous person?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nikka Starr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

repeatedly created BLP about a non notable minor

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Nikka Starr, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 08:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikka Starr (April 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 12:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please....

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am just creating an article for a notable person im begging you please unblock me im begging you i promise i will not create the article nikka starr anymore promise. THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, THEBIOGRAPHYMASTER. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dark Room".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck 00:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]