User talk:TFMWNCB
August 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
TFMWNCB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ScottishFinnishRadish failed to declare his conflict of interest when placing this block. He is not only a member of Wikipediocracy, as was I until recently, I have specifically criticised him there specifically regarding his actions as an Administrator. I cannot provide links because they are now inaccessible to me due to the site owner @Stanistani: deciding my views on netball were a threat to his desire to harass Laura Hale and/or please @Yngvadottir:, but hopefully ScottishFinnishRadish decides now is the time to be transparent and will link to them (you will still need a Wikipediocracy account to view them). I would like this block to be reviewed by an Administrator with no opinions on me or the matters I raised there either way. If that Administrator decides that my two edits are proof I am not and never could be of use to Wikipedia, so be it. I don't particularly see what was wrong with them, but I doubt ScottishFinnishRadish made the decision not to explain that without being influenced by his undeclared connection to me. Who knows, perhaps Stanistani asked him to place this block via a Wikipediocracy private message. How would anyone know? TFMWNCB (talk) 22:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This block was correctly placed. Your edits offered no indication whatsoever that you are here to contribute to this project. This does not mean, as you claim, that "my two edits are proof I am not and never could be of use to Wikipedia", only that you haven't demonstrated that yet. It doesn't help that you are bringing off wiki disputes here. However, if you have contributions to make to Wikipedia, please tell what those are. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TFMWNCB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"This block was correctly placed" is clearly incorrect. ScottishFinnishRadish failing to declare his connection to me is a clear and obvious breach of WP:INVOLVED. If and only if that is acknowledged by an Administrator who takes ownership of this block (or lifts it as a manifestly abusive block on its face), will I entertain the matter of what I plan to edit going forward. You do not get to assume bad faith just because the first person to block me failed to declare his off wiki interest in blocking me. TFMWNCB (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Globally banned — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.