User talk:Synthelabobabe21

March 2016

Unfortunately, we had a personal repairing in March 14, 2016 at 5:00 am to 12:00 pm. Some articles will be removed if you can't do with permission. Please do this seriously. We are apologize for inconvience.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abbott Laboratories may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abbott Laboratories may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging articles

Hello and thank you for your contributions to articles. May I ask that when you place cleanup tags in articles will you please make sure that the tags meet the case - e.g. in Philippine Sea you placed a tag {{empty section}} on a section that wasn't empty, and another {{unreferenced section}} when it did give a reference. Another point is that the date on a tag should always be the month when it was placed (at present March 2016) - you dated one tag as 1999, which is before Wikipedia even started: Noyster (talk), 01:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hippopotomontrosesquipedalian

Hello Synthelabobabe21,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hippopotomontrosesquipedalian for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JSFarman (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Problems with the Article

A tag has been placed on Template:Problems with the Article requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. General Ization ^Talk 04:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Your addition to Sunovion has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging articles (again)

Further to my message above (Tagging articles), unfortunately you are still doing this - you added three extra tags to Proximus dated 2001, 2002 and 2003, where they should of course have been dated March 2016. Also at least two of the tags did not apply: {{Refimprove}} was redundant to the existing tag {{unreferenced}}, and there was nothing in the article to justify your {{advert}} tag. If you continue to tag articles inappropriately and with wrong dates, I fear it will be regarded as Disruptive editing. If you need further explanation just state below and I will try to help: Noyster (talk), 21:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Rights Topicons

Hi, please only add topicons once you get the right, not before. Thanks In veritas (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noggin Corporation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Noggin Corporation, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 17:34, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rip in Peperonis

The article Rip in Peperonis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rip in Peperonis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rip in Peperonis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Synthelabobabe21. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Ethanlu121 (talk) 01:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Synthelabobabe21, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Ethanlu121 (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lincoln (2012 film), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 02:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Turkey (bird). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. The two tags you placed were not applicable and, as before, were not dated correctly. : Noyster (talk), 10:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Rights Topicons Again

Hi, I am In veritas, and once again please don't add user right topicons, when you don't have the right yet. It is misleading to other users. If you want to get the right, you should head to WP:PERM In veritas (talk) 02:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rendered Ideas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rendered Ideas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CurseBot

A tag has been placed on User:CurseBot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

there is no evidence that this "bot" has been approved.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. : Noyster (talk), 10:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article template

I have removed the Featured Article template from your user page. It is intended ONLY for use in article space, on articles that have been deemed by the Wikipedia community to be worthy of Featured Article status. Safiel (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Rights Topicons for the 3rd time

Once again, please do not add user right topicons when you don't have the right. If you want admin, you should check out WP:RFA. In veritas (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unilever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Inc-films

Template:Inc-films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. : Noyster (talk), 11:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

What is your explanation for this edit? Do you really find the Creed film to have connections to Space Jam? I'm also very concerned that so far about zero of your edits I've spot checked have been constructive... Sergecross73 msg me 13:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I gave you a chance to explain your disruptive editing, and instead, you've chosen to create a terrible looking article, and misrepresent it as a Featured Article. It seems all of your edits have the intent of deceiving people, so until you can explain yourself, or promise not to do this anymore, you are indefinitely blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 12:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Inc-films

A tag has been placed on Template:Inc-films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daniel Kenneth (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Synthelabobabe21, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Synthelabobabe21, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block Evasion of the Fourth Kind

Block evasion begins. Here are samples:

Fucking articles like others GMA Network when new user blocked cause by moving GMA Network to GMA Scam Network. Synthelabobabe21 (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

fuckskdoldodkenxosksoejdicoswixkwnsssjaiajenefkkkl. Synthelabobabe21 (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]