User talk:SusanCummins

Welcome!

Hello, SusanCummins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 20:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:SusanCummins/sandbox (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 23:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SusanCummins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, SusanCummins! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 20:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Gralnick (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lisa Gralnick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 21:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SusanCummins. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 00:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 00:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, SusanCummins. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by – Margin1522 (talk) 23:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi, I saw your comments at the Teahouse and project page. That is perfect. Also I took a look at Draft:Lisa Gralnick and it is really good. I think you can be confident that this time it will pass. The only thing left to fix is the one remaining inline reference to the New York Times website. If you get ambitious, you might even want to check out Wikipedia:Did you know, which is a showcase for the best new articles on Wikipedia. If it gets selected, it will feature in a small box on the top page, which would be great way to let people know about your project. Anyway best of luck, this looks like a really good project. – Margin1522 (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Margin. I will fix the NYT inline reference if you can tell me what is wrong with it. I tried to make it work numerous ways but I can't tell which is correct. Can you help? I have a hard time understanding most of the directions on the site and so please don't suggest another page reference but a demonstration would be the biggest help. Thanks. SusanCummins (talk) 04:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's easier to show than to explain, so I just did it. Basically instead of [Example.com This is an example] they want to have all of the cites inside <ref>...</ref> tags. So I just did it like all of the other cites, using the {{Cite news}} template. One other thing I noticed is that there seem to be 2 authors for the Bellevue exhibition catalog, for pages 75 and 76. That might be OK, but if you have the book maybe you could check it. – Margin1522 (talk) 09:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, now I see what happened. The editor of the Bellevue catalog was Atkinson, and the first cite simply didn't mention that. I fixed that, with page numbers as originally given, so it should be OK now. Sorry for the confusion. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lisa Gralnick has been accepted

Lisa Gralnick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 19:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, SusanCummins. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

I tried to delete some of the Lisa Gralnick article in my Sandbox and the article published on Wikipedia was edited at the same time. How can I keep from changing my existing article and start a new one. I don't seem to be able to delete it without causing consequences. Thanks Susan SusanCummins (talk) 22:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Bennett (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamie Bennett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

One life to live (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamie Bennett

Hello, SusanCummins. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jamie Bennett".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]