User talk:Surtsicna/Archive 23

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

Alice of Champagne

I am thinking of nominating Alice of Champagne for FA. As you were a major contributor, would you mind if I indicated you as a co-nominator? Borsoka (talk) 00:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Dear Borsoka and Serial Number 54129: many, many thanks for the kind words you left for me at the Alice nomination page. (It is so lovely seeing the golden star on her bio!) Lately, and for some time up to my hiatus, I have found it stressful to deal with editors whose strength of opinion is vastly disproportionate to their contribution to the main space/article content. But I have been editing for over half of my life now (rather scary a thing to write) and the itchiness to go back to it cannot be helped. You might see me devoting more time to other topics, however. Thank you both! Surtsicna (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I am really glad you are back. I was worrying about you. :) Borsoka (talk) 01:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha

Hello @Surtsicna, you might recall that you made a number of suggestions to improve the article Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha a few months ago. The article is now going through an FA review. I was wondering if you might be interested in leaving some comments or supporting the nomination. Llewee (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry I was not around to help out more, Llewee. The article looks beautiful with its golden star! Surtsicna (talk) 08:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes I am very proud of it Llewee (talk) 10:28, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Welcome back and request to collaborate

Dear Surtsicna,

I hope that this message finds you well. I noticed that you had recently edited some pages on my watchlist. Consequently, I wanted to take this opportunity to formally welcome you back to Wikipedia. Please know that I have always appreciated and respected your insight, and your hiatus did not go unnoticed.

Also, I saw this comment of yours on Marie Antoinette's talk page. That piqued my interest because I have also found the ahnentafels presented on various articles to be quite confusing.

If I may ask, are you still interested in revising how royal genealogy is presented on Wikipedia? If so, I would be happy to work together with you to improve that presentation across articles. That being said, if you are not interested, I understand.

Sincerely,

AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, AndrewPeterT. Thank you for your kind words. I am happy to be back and do still care about if/how we present genealogy. Surtsicna (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Perugia's limia

On 30 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Perugia's limia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that dominant males of Perugia's limia (species pictured) may be so preoccupied with fighting each other that the females end up mating with the subordinate males? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Perugia's limia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Perugia's limia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kingdom of Macedonia (proposal)

The article Kingdom of Macedonia (proposal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability of this article. No reliable, secondary, independent sources can be found on this topic and this idea seems to be only an ephemeral short-lived proposal, if any.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jingiby (talk) 08:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poecilia vandepolli

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Poecilia vandepolli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poecilia vandepolli

The article Poecilia vandepolli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Poecilia vandepolli and Talk:Poecilia vandepolli/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Poecilia vandepolli

On 24 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poecilia vandepolli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the small fish species Poecilia vandepolli existed, then it did not, and now it does again? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poecilia vandepolli. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poecilia vandepolli), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Vollpension

On 27 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vollpension, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Vollpension employs grandparents to bake cakes according to their own recipes and, during the COVID-19 pandemic, offered live baking courses from elders around the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vollpension. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vollpension), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Fishy Barnstar
		For your recent work on livebearers. They've been very educational! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

That's very sweet, GreenLipstickLesbian! (I still cannot get over how hilarious your user name is.) There is much more to come. I am genuinely surprised at how underdeveloped our species articles still are. Surtsicna (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poecilia vandepolli

The article Poecilia vandepolli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Poecilia vandepolli for comments about the article, and Talk:Poecilia vandepolli/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

House of Romanov Page - Possible Vandalism/ Edit Warring

Hello, I just realized that Just kidding me? (talk) keeps editing the House of Romanov page relying on original research and not using reliable sources. They seem to want to include the name of an alleged Romanov descendant unattested elsewhere, also I see that they keep deleting the edits of anyone who challenges their position. Would you be so kind as to assist in fixing this situation please? This page appears to be constantly vandalized by people who wish to support one disputed claimant to the head of the house over the other... Thank you. Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Frid.antonia-arlon (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Jason Kassab

This particular editor is back adding irrelevant ancestry tables to articles. The majority of these articles don't even have reference(s) concerning the parentage of these individuals, which negates connecting them to these vast genealogies. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Xiphophorus signum

On 21 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xiphophorus signum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Xiphophorus signum is the only swordtail not known to hybridise with other species? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xiphophorus signum. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Xiphophorus signum), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ioveta

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ioveta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alanna the Brave -- Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria Komnene, Queen of Jerusalem

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria Komnene, Queen of Jerusalem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cplakidas -- Cplakidas (talk) 06:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ioveta

The article Ioveta you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ioveta and Talk:Ioveta/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alanna the Brave -- Alanna the Brave (talk) 06:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Hathumoda

On 30 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hathumoda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an attempt to portray Abbess Hathumoda as a Christian saint after her death failed because everyone knew that she could be quite petulant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hathumoda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hathumoda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Missing source in Guy of Lusignan

Hi, in this edit to Guy of Lusignan you introduced an sfn reference {{sfn|Bennett|2021|p=106}}. Unfortunately no work "Bennett 2021" is listed, so nobody can look the reference up, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing source it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Done! Thanks. Surtsicna (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)