User talk:Supermaner

AutoCAD Wiki

You may be interested in contributing to wikicities:AutoCAD. I'm sure your help there would be appreciated. Tom Haws (talk) 20:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Kirchick

Why are all of your User boxes on this page? And please see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Talk:James_Kirchick.23Kirchick_Integrity. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Back at you. Please see the talk page, and in the future, do some research before removing people's edits.

Tax

Hello, I'm Famspear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Famspear (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Srich32977. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tax seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wiktionary does not use the term. Stop edit warring over it. – S. Rich (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Tax. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]