Jump to content

User talk:Sunil B Sonar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Sunil B Sonar, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mia Sand (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sunil B Sonar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Anthurium veitchii have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 19:21, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Allison Williams (actress). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Sunil B Sonar. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Englamorous has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Englamorous, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Englamorous (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for notifying me about my indefinite block from editing. I understand that my account was found to be engaged in advertising or promotional activities, which is against the community guidelines. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my actions.
I have thoroughly read the guide to appealing blocks and understand the process involved in requesting an unblock. I acknowledge the importance of adhering to the principles of fairness, accuracy, and neutrality in contributing to the community.
After careful consideration, I would like to submit an unblock request. I believe there are valid reasons for lifting the block, and I assure you that I will strictly adhere to the community guidelines in the future. I understand the seriousness of my actions and the impact they may have had on the community.
Once again, I apologize for my previous behavior and assure you that it will not be repeated. I genuinely value this community and the opportunity to contribute positively. I appreciate your understanding and consideration.
Thank you for your time. Sunil B Sonar (talk) 21:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunil B Sonar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you for notifying me about my indefinite block from editing. I understand that my account was found to be engaged in advertising or promotional activities, which is against the community guidelines. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my actions. :I have thoroughly read the guide to appealing blocks and understand the process involved in requesting an unblock. I acknowledge the importance of adhering to the principles of fairness, accuracy, and neutrality in contributing to the community. :After careful consideration, I would like to submit an unblock request. I believe there are valid reasons for lifting the block, and I assure you that I will strictly adhere to the community guidelines in the future. I understand the seriousness of my actions and the impact they may have had on the community. :Once again, I apologize for my previous behavior and assure you that it will not be repeated. I genuinely value this community and the opportunity to contribute positively. I appreciate your understanding and consideration. :Thank you for your time. :

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to be generated using an AI, raising serious WP:CIR concerns. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.