User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2021/June

This is an archive of past discussions with User:SunDawn. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

common sense & basic data... i could not find a ref. to the 2nd cypto bubble

but thanks for the rapid delete, and to explain like a five year old on how to reference.

i am going to give you a warm cookie as a thank you. if you happen to find any charts, feel free to post on the crypto bubble page within wikipedia

have an amazing day

Hello 186.69.189.65 (talk · contribs)! Good day to you! I am sorry if my explanation seems to harsh. The rules of Wikipedia is that it forbids statements that are not supported by sources, and also statements that stem out of our personal research WP:OR and your edits seems like an original research. If you have questions, please do ask me! Have a great day! SunDawn (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

eight minutes for a rapid delete gets you a tray of virtual cookies for SunDawn

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 01:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Removal of my edit

You just now removed an edit from the Nibiru Wikipedia page because you say I didn't leave a source. Exactly what do you mean by source? This is my first time doing this and didn't know that a source was required. Is there a section which asks me for source? WayTruMedia (talk) 08:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello WayTruMedia (talk · contribs)! Good day to you and welcome to Wikipedia! In Wikipedia everything has to be verified using reliable sources, as shown in WP:RS. Sources that are from our own personal research are not allowed to be on the Wikipedia, per WP:OR. The page of WP:CITE will also show you a guide to properly use sources, when adding materials to the article. If you have questions, please do ask! I will gladly help. Good day! SunDawn (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

i get it, your professional response is worth a barnstar

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		i get it, your professional response is worth a barnstar ...cheers....Good day to you! I am sorry if my explanation seems to harsh. The rules of Wikipedia is that it forbids statements that are not supported by sources, and also statements that stem out of our personal research...your response is totally pro.!!!)*

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news

Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
5	St Blane's Church, Dunblane (talk)	Add sources
6	The Race Is On (album) (talk)	Add sources
5	Gartness (talk)	Add sources
4	Cornton (talk)	Add sources
52	The Race Is On (talk)	Add sources
9	Raploch (talk)	Add sources
342	Relic Entertainment (talk)	Cleanup
4	Henri Lambert (talk)	Cleanup
73	Music of Texas (talk)	Cleanup
14	Léonie Duquet (talk)	Expand
61	Alfredo Astiz (talk)	Expand
13	Blanefield (talk)	Expand
875	Dirty War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
83	Kanoon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
139	Real-time tactics (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
168	Gotrek and Felix (talk)	Merge
26	Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University (talk)	Merge
13	Central Station (gay club, Moscow, Russia) (talk)	Merge
1,912	Dunblane massacre (talk)	Wikify
4	1987 Carapintada mutiny (talk)	Wikify
36	St Machar's Cathedral (talk)	Wikify
3	Héctor Hidalgo Solá (talk)	Orphan
3	Augusto Conte Mac Donell (talk)	Orphan
5	Fernando Traverso's Bicis (talk)	Orphan
190	Two Point Studios (talk)	Stub
5	Jacques Bordiot (talk)	Stub
6	Darko Pajović (talk)	Stub
16	Ranko Krivokapić (talk)	Stub
4	Ardchullarie More (talk)	Stub
5	Broomridge (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Darkovibes

hello, at the time I created this article I had serious interest in the artist and I believe this is a clear case of conflict of interest. This article does not deserve to be on Wikipedia as I manipulated the system to get it up. I am a changed man and I want to right my wrongs. Do as you please with this information. Thanks.--AlikotoSam (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Tissue-pack marketing

Should I write here? It is not clear to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:1411:7300:C974:C738:15D1:ADED (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Good day 2a02:1811:1411:7300:c974:c738:15d1:aded (talk · contribs) how can I help you? Hopefully you have a great day! I see that both of us are editing Tissue-pack marketing. The problem with your edit here is that I think the edits are not related to tissue-pack marketing at all, and the sources provided looks like a corporate website, instead of secondary sources that are discussing about the topic. If you have any other questions, please do ask! SunDawn (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Corruption in Mauritius. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Chris (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SunDawn/Archives/2021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for my mistakes. I had thought that my last revert is exempted in 3RR, but I should have just reported and waited. I am very sorry. I really didn’t mean harm to the Wikipedia at large. I promise to be more careful in the future, and continue to provide positive contributions to the encyclopedia. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 13:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I suggest you wait out the block and read about edit warring some more. 3RR is just a a rule to quickly stop the worst edit warring, but edit warring in general is also not tolerated. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SunDawn (talk) 13:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

John Robb edit

Hello thanks for taking the time to check the sources.

The information I added is correct though and the sources are valid.

1. I need to update John Robb TV work 2. Also his two new projects - the Green Britain Academy https://www.greenbritainacademy.org and Borders Blurred https://bordersblurred.com 3. Also his new book projects

DaveTCurtis (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

North Kembangan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, North Kembangan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Curious

Did you read this reference, Lyons, Malcolm Cameron and David Edward Pritchett Jackson, Saladin: The Politics of the Holy War, (Cambridge University Press, 1982), page 2, before you removed this information? --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Apologies, I wrongly assumed it is vandalism as it is added without a change of the references. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
21	Varaprasad Rao Velagapalli (talk)	Add sources
190	Maria Ressa (talk)	Add sources
575	Bohemia (rapper) (talk)	Add sources
52	Parchur (Assembly constituency) (talk)	Add sources
17	Roller Games (talk)	Add sources
115	Military funeral (talk)	Add sources
64	Badugi (talk)	Cleanup
26	ID Quantique (talk)	Cleanup
729	Bowling (talk)	Cleanup
208	1996 United States Senate elections (talk)	Expand
107	Botsa Satyanarayana (talk)	Expand
58	European Union tax haven blacklist (talk)	Expand
26	Pinipe Viswarup (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46	Occupancy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,846	Nandamuri Balakrishna (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,712	Demography (talk)	Merge
217	Essilor (talk)	Merge
138	Clientelism (talk)	Merge
357	Anerood Jugnauth (talk)	Wikify
61	Kovvur (SC) (Assembly constituency) (talk)	Wikify
121	The Art Institutes (talk)	Wikify
3	Nagulapalem (talk)	Orphan
4	Batuli (actress) (talk)	Orphan
3	Amitabh Aurora (talk)	Orphan
21	Anantha Venkatarami Reddy (talk)	Stub
12	Spencerian College (talk)	Stub
35	Gadde Ramamohan (talk)	Stub
76	Muttamsetti Srinivasa Rao (talk)	Stub
23	Baby Boomer (video game) (talk)	Stub
56	Sanada Nobuyuki (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Cimbrian War edit

Hi! I removed this as it is not a reliable source of information, the figures presented represent an ancient Roman statement and it matters when we want to know about their vision of this event, but they cannot be used as a reliable source since they are biased and not based on anything other than imagination and the desire to praise the reign of the consul HernánCortés1518 (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@HernánCortés1518: Hello, let's continue the discussion on the talk page of the Cimbrian War is it would be better to discuss there. Thank you! SunDawn (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)