User talk:SubSeven/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

UFC 84

A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Magazine request

Hey, I noticed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Magazines/PC Gamer (US) that you have the March 1999 issue that mentions Midtown Madness. If this is true, could you please email me a copy - my email is g1ggyman@gmail.com.

Thanks in advance, giggy _(:O) 05:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I see you have two issues which mention Planescape: Torment. The article recently had a major overhaul to become a "Good Article", and soon there might be a push for FA. Do you still have your November 1998 and March 2000 issues of PC Gamer available? If you could help in anyway, that would be great. You can e-mail me if you'd like. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 12:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

That's great! Thank you. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 19:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Magazine question

Do you, perchance, have the April 1999 issue of PC Gamer US? It contains a review of Thief: The Dark Project that would be extremely helpful, as that article is currently undergoing a very successful collaboration. I know you aren't listed as having it, but since the issues you listed were so random and far apart, I thought that you might have been giving a general outline of the issues of PC Gamer US that you have. If not, I apologize in advance. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, those are indeed the only issues I own (from that time frame). I wasn't a subscriber then, just a kid who bought an issue whenever he had the cash :)

I hope you are able to track down the issue! --SubSeven (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dragonblazetitlescr.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dragonblazetitlescr.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Magazine request

Hi. Looks like I've asked you for Thief material before, but here I am again. It is listed here that a The Dark Project preview is in the September 1997 issue of PC Gamer US. If you have time, scans/photos/etc. of this preview would be extremely helpful. I'm preparing to make a large push on the article, and I need all the material I can get my hands on. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I don't have this issue either. No wonder I wasn't into Thief much :) For what it's worth, User:Thibbs is the one who posted that Sep. 1997 issue, although he didn't 'sign' it. --SubSeven (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh; sorry to bother you again. I was sure that you'd merely forgotten to sign it, since you were the one with all of the issues surrounding it. Looks like Thibbs is still editing, though, so I'll drop a note on his talk page. Thanks for the tip. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Magicianlordboxcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Magicianlordboxcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PrideFinalConflict2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PrideFinalConflict2003.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Heroes of Might and Magic

Thanks SubSeven for cleaning this reception section up, that's all I was looking for. I had no idea how to cleanly reference an existing citation twice in one article, hence I did not do it! :)Mike padilla (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I saw your new edits. Looks good! --SubSeven (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop undoing my small contribution. There is no reason : all I say is true, and I can cite the change log of 1.2 to prove it : there is no mention of the AI being fixed, the balance being fixed, or countless other bugs reported being fixed. Even Ubisoft has acknowledge what I said, by saying they have still many patches to make (roughly 4 more). Anonymous_carl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.144.8 (talk) 02:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your statement needs to be properly sourced. You have links on your talk page which introduce you to using references on Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any specific questions about that. And a changelog is probably not a sufficient source. --SubSeven (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

PC Gamer

Hi! I was told by User:Thibbs that you own some old PC Gamer US issues. Could you mail me some scans of The Curse of Monkey Island preview from July 1997 issue (provided that you have it, of course)? Thanks in advance, Electroguv (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I have a handful of issues from that time period, but July 1997 is not one of them, I'm afraid. --SubSeven (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. Still, thanks for your time. Electroguv (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Anon vandal

Just FYI, I have reported the IP vandal on the Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. DP76764 (Talk) 16:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Beat me to it.. --SubSeven (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Ha, that's a first for me :) Cheers! DP76764 (Talk) 16:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I've reported you both for violating Terms of Use of Wikipedia. Personals egos are not to be fullfilled here at Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agamemnon s (talk • contribs) 16:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Apologize for this. was not privy to WP rules and regulations regarding sourced content etc. Will refrain and leave such opinion for other blogs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.238.117.186 (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Vandalism is pointless

Please do not vandalize the article for Black Swan again. Or you will be reported. Adminstrators have already agreed that "critical acclaim" is an opinion, and cannot be used to describe a film's critical reception. Thank you.--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Which admins would those be? --SubSeven (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A lenghty discussion about it took place at the talk page of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2. Now i already warned you once of vandalizing the article, and you did it again. If you revert it, you WILL be reported. Thank you.--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

First of all, nothing that has happened here is 'vandalism'. I read the page that you linked, and administrators agreed on no such thing. The one admin who was participating was coming down more on your side, if anything.

If you disagree with the editors involved in the conversation above, then your next step should probably be initiating a Request for Comment. If you would like help with that, let me know. But in the meantime, I recommend you stop making edits based on WP:POINT. --SubSeven (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

The source for Black Swan isn't even accurate. The Rotten Tomatoes page does not say anywhere that it received "widespread acclaim".--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 00:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PrideTotalElimination2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PrideTotalElimination2003.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Black Swan (film)". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 18:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution (Diablo III)

Hey SubSeven,

Looks like the bot didn't notify you, but there's a DRN over D3 at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Diablo_III. -- ferret (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks ferret. --SubSeven (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1.

	Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1.
	Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1. Edvardbrns (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2012 Breeders' Cup, SubSeven!

Wikipedia editor Theopolisme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the new article; keep it up! :) —Theopolisme 23:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Theopolisme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Sega Saturn - your comment and revert of the edit

Hi SubSeven,

I am the webmaster of the site that you just deleted the link with an obscure comment on the Sega Saturn page.
It was the first time I added myself the link to my site, and I don't understand your comment.
Could you explain the meaning of your comment and what you don't like about the site ? Why do I feel so much anger in your words ?
My goal is not to spam Wikipedia or anything else that could hurt people of other sites and I want to understand why you reacted this way.

Thanks for your reply and your interest, and sorry if I misused something here as I am new to Wikipedia.

Cheers,

Madroms (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Old Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain review

Hi SubSeven. Sorry to bother you, but I'm working on a rewrite of the Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain article, and the reference library notes that you're able to provide an old writeup on the game. The issue in question is December 1997 of the US edition of PC Gamer. If it's not an imposition, could I ask you to send a scan, or any material, from the review in this magazine if you get a chance? Anything you can send would be very much appreciated, but thanks for your time in any case. --LoK Wiki (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Well I've embarrassingly just realised that I somehow completely forgot to offer my gratitude to you for retrieving this scan. Definitely going to make use of it soon, so I hope it's not inappropriate to say an extremely belated thank you very much. --LoK Wiki (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

No trouble at all, you're welcome! --SubSeven (talk) 01:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your vote at DRV...

... won't be counted because its a personal attack not a policy based argument. Please consider removing your abuse and replacing it with something policy based. Thanks. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I didn't vote. Thanks for your concern. --SubSeven (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

If its not a vote then you won't mind my removing it then? Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Go ahead, remove it. Mtking is stating a falsehood as if it were fact, and using it as a foundation for his DRV. We wouldn't want anybody to know that, now, would we? Let him lie. --SubSeven (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3