Jump to content

User talk:Studentsmith/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Instructor feedback

[edit]

Both of your articles are excellent choices. Well done! For this project please work on the crisis management article. Please let your group members know which passage you are working on, as they will also be looking for supporting articles/information.
--Librarydenyse (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Studentsmith! If you are still looking for sources for citations on crisis communication management with regard to the Pepsi crisis, Check out this article: "Of Syringes, Celebrities, and Crisis Communications" by John Elasser. It can be found on the MSVU EBSCO database! Elsasser, J. (1994). Of syringes, celebrities and crisis communications. Public Relations Tactics, 1(3), 22.

Libraryemilyr (talk) 05:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Worksheet

Choose a classmate’s Wikipedia Sandbox page.

Links to sandbox pages are available in Moodle within each of the groups. Please choose a classmate whose work you have not yet reviewed.

Review the page.

Your name:

Meshari Alanazi Name of Sanbox:


Studentsmith Please verify that the article(s) they have chosen are appropriate for their citation and new content. Please use the evaluation criteria that you used for your own content (i.e relevancy, author expertise, reputable publisher, secondary sources based on research)

[ x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Maybe


If they are any issues, please identify which of the criteria was not fully met.

The information perfectly met, and there was more detail on the new content which I believe is good for such a passage like this one. Great job.

If the source was not appropriate, do you have any suggestions regarding a search strategy that might help them to find a better source?


The resource was through MSVU library database, and the criteria used was “AND” and it’s seems to be a great resource.


Is the new passage well written and grammatically correct?


Yes it is. No grammar mistakes found and it’s well written.



Do you have any suggestions that might improve upon the passage?

The passage is great, the information is in order of the same passage that need citation and this is good thing. It’s clear and understandable. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeshKSA (talkcontribs) 01:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]