User talk:Street sting

Speedy deletion nomination of Hip Hop Movement

Hello Street sting,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hip Hop Movement for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 02:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your draft article to the draft namespace so you can work on it. You can now find it at Draft:Hip Hop Movement. -- GB fan 12:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.36.160 (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so much

Please can you review and add to the article to make it better this would be of great help Street sting (talk) 15:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- GB fan 21:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- GB fan 21:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage. -- GB fan 21:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- GB fan 21:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Street sting. You have new messages at Meiloorun's talk page.
Message added 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CoI?

Hello, I was wondering if you are Ronald "Bee-Stinger" Savage himself. If you are, it might be a conflict of interest. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No I i'm from New York and this story is big out here, I friend requested him on my facebook, i felt his story because my sister was molested before so i can connect to what this man is saying, also thank you for fixing the grammar on the page it looks better. I read so much on him in the last two months I feel like a fan, a lot of people feel that way out here in new york. Street sting (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Street sting. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Street sting. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your recent editing history at Ronald Savage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ GB fan 00:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GB it is very clear that you are the one starting this war, and to me it's not a war i'm getting known published facts that i researched and placed it into his profile. You been doing it from day one with this man being the owner of the hip hop movement, i know it's hard for you to except that he is but you clearly can see and now know he is. You must have something against it or you would not be doing it. I'm humbly asking you to stop this and let the facts be known that he is clearly the owner of the hip hop movement, this man has clearly been though a lot. I listed more then enough published sources for you to stop this act. I'm asking please. It is also on his website www.ronaldsavage.com and also on the hip hop movement website itself. Street sting (talk) 00:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who is edit warring? In the past 14 hours two editors have removed the content and you have restored it three times. You are the only one that is close to violating the three revert rule. Your discussion about it so far is to threaten that you will report both editors that have removed it. ~ GB fan 01:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for message - I will look into the concerns you identified as soon as I can

Hi Street sting, and thank you for this message.
Due to work commitments, I may not be able to address the issues you identified straight away, but I will endeavor to work towards finding a solution as soon possible.
Thank you again. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Hip Hop Movementpng.png

Thanks for uploading File:Hip Hop Movementpng.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Street sting. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your addition to Ronald Savage has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hip Hop Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Afd

Nomination of Hip Hop Movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hip Hop Movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip Hop Movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including improving the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

isento (talk) 21:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afd - I oppose to this Nomination of Hip Hop Movement for deletion, let me ask you a serious question why would you request this to a page that has been up for 6 years and has been approved 6 years ago and is 100% the truth, is there a personal reason you are doing this, first you go on his Ronald Savage page and deleted all his music listings which you would not had done that to another hip hop artist and what's questionable is why did you delete: Savage has also fought to help change the statute of limitations laws in New York State against child molesters then right after that what is very alarming is why did you unlike hip hop movement that was on his page, then go over to hip hop movement which is man owns the trademark for an ask that the page be deletd when all the hip hop pioneers appreciated that page and gave him his props. I am respectfully asking if you can remove this and we talk like man, this page had been apprived 6 years ago. --Street sting (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 05:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yeeno i didn't remove anyone comments at all, as far as the notice, I was reading the wiki page on oppose and i did what it said to do maybe i read it wrong but i thought i was going it wright when you oppise, this has been up there for 6 years and this guy went to every page that i wrote taking it down lying say something about safe promotion just to get it down, 5 years also i had ither user help me and should be what to do in wiki and they added their things to it, I too was molested very young thats why i had my friends help me also do research, i think this user has a persinal issue because who takes the time to go around and do what he is doing and also remove that this guy Ronald helped get the child victims act past, whi dies that, and this is known worldwide. sorry about that i put it on my talk page and the other page that the wiki article said to do, to pervent anyone from doing it again, this hip hop movement was approved 5 years ago by wiki when i challage the frist time which was 5 years ago and it evert happen again until now, i could under if it was just that but everything from this guy Ronald Savage was invold in this same user went around delting things that been up on wiki for years, it seems personal thats all. Can you help me, I really don't know much about wiki ither then what users should be or did for me. --Street sting (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hip hop

Your recent editing history at Hip hop shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Piotr Jr. (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing the same thing so this counts for you too, you are the one in an edit war rather than talking to me about it on the talk page, let it stay up, and talk to me about it on my talk page, as you had claim things that were not true without doing any reach research. --Street sting (talk) 17:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Piotr Jr. (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Hip hop. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 45807

UTRS appeal #45807 declined. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 01:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Street sting, I know you are disappointed that an article was deleted but you must stop attacking other editors. Personal attacks against other editors can result in a loss of editing privileges. This article was deleted through an AFD discussion which means that not one person was responsible. If you have questions about the deletion process, please visit the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz

Yes, I will hit you up on your talk page tomorrow but the comments are not personal attacks at all they are backed up with facts but no one is saying how a hip hop legend is being attacked out of know where and we don't even know who is behind this computer, Liz you can't tell in in a matter of 5 mins after 5 years everything this man done is being touched by one person and then of cause put into the community page with a bias statement, everyone else sees it, then one of the big things that hip hop artist is known for in NYS is the Child victims Acts and again this one person takes it down when everyone in hip hop knows who Ron Savage is and he helps to get that law pass, and the same user excuse was it wasn't in the new york daily news which was right there in the ref, he didn't read it, but I'm the bad guy here when I'm trying to show you all whats going on. Loz I say this much respectfully it's not personal attacks it's backed up by facts about what he is doing. But I will hit you on your talk page but who can I speak with that is not bias to this matter and he has a redirect user name that is counting as two if someone would just look at what I have been saying you would see it with the time frames, that's all I'm asking, and how do you delete a page with 5 votes, but ok, i will hit you on your user page, way one more thing lol i'm sorry Why did i get hit with the 3 strikes and he didn't when he started it then baited me so he can have someone in that community group block me from talking while they deleted a page that was there for 5 years but a person who started editing in 2021. It was like he was going really hard on getting this man or his legacy off wiki he even took all his music off that he did and the only person your looking at is me whos not attacking but defending.--Street sting (talk) 06:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)--Street sting (talk) 06:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Six Elements of the Hip Hop Movement"

Revised after 6 years in Wikipedia, please add on or edit so it can be replaced back into hip hop article. Please listen to interviews as well they're time-stamped, I think I did it right.

In 1990, Ron "Bee-Stinger" Savage, a former member of the Zulu Nation, (Savage is known as the son of the Hip Hop Movement) while working with the hip hop group Snap is credited with coining the term "Six Elements of the Hip Hop Movement" being inspired by Public Enemy's rap conscious style recordings. In 2017 The Chief Rocker Busy Bee stated “Hip Hop Movement is a term that has been used throughout the past for several decades but it has never been used in an official capacity. Through our efforts, the term and its language will have new meaning" Busy Bee and Ron “Bee-Stinger” Savage that hip hop movement is trademarked now as well as the logo so this is going to be new to them as well as everyone else after so long of hip hop movement not having legal meaning and ownership. Busy Bee and Bee-Stinger stated, "that Hip Hop and Rap are two different things and when artists are recording and talking about shooting guns, disrespecting women, and selling drugs in their records that is not a part of the hip hop movement or hip hop". The official “Six Elements of the Hip Hop Movement" are: Consciousness Awareness, Civil Rights Awareness, Activism Awareness, Justice, Political Awareness, and Community Awareness in music.

Below is the references /sources attached to the article

In 1990, Ron "Bee-Stinger" Savage, a former member of the Zulu Nation, (Savage is known as the son of the Hip Hop Movement) while working with the hip hip group Snap is credited with coining the term "Six Elements of the Hip Hop Movement" being inspired by Public Enemy's rap conscious style recordings. </ref>https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_History_of_Hip_Hop/NMSKDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=six+elements+of+the+hip+hop+movement&pg=PT5&printsec=frontcover</ref></ref>https://parkchestertimes.com/ronald-savage-better-known-as-bee-stinger-trademarks-hip-hop-movement</ref> </ref>https://www.iamhiphopmagazine.com/news-ronald-savage-the-hip-hop-movement/</ref> In 2017 The Chief Rocker Busy Bee stated “Hip Hop Movement is a term that has been used throughout the past for several decades but it has never been used in an official capacity. Through our efforts, the term and its language will have new meaning,” </ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9f0jGPYFXk</ref> </ref>https://www.doggiediamondstv.com/ron-savage-busy-bee-acquire-hip-hop-movement-trademark/</ref>ref>https://boombapnation.com/hip-hop-movement-ceo-ron-bee-stinger-savage-drops-stop-cappin-video</ref>Busy Bee and Ron “Bee-Stinger” Savage stated that hip hop movement is trademarked now as well as the logo</ref> http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2017/may/19/fourth-season-ordered-black-ish/</ref></ref>6:00-6:51</ref></ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9f0jGPYFXk</ref>so this is going to be new to them as well as everyone else after so long of hip hop movement not having legal meaning and ownership. Busy Bee and Bee-Stinger stated “that Hip Hop and Rap are two different things and when artist are recording and talking about shooting guns, disrespecting women, and selling drugs in your records that is not a part of the hip hop movement or hip hop”. </ref> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9f0jGPYFXk</ref></ref>1:00 – 1:28-</ref>The official "Six Elements of the Hip Hop Movement" are: Consciousness Awareness, Civil Rights Awareness, Activism Awareness, Justice, Political Awareness, and Community Awareness in music</ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Xz50h-u78&t=1025s18:28</ref></ref>15:28-18:28</ref></ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9f0jGPYFXk</ref></ref>https://www.spankradio.uk/blog/hip-hop-as-a-culture-6-elements-of-the-hip-hop-movement/amp/</ref></ref>https://parkchestertimes.com/ronald-savage-better-known-as-bee-stinger-trademarks-hip-hop-movement</ref></ref>https://www.birthofhiphop.com/jay-z-with-dean-baquet/</ref></ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9f0jGPYFXk</ref>https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_History_of_Hip_Hop_Collection/D232DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=six+elements+of+the+hip+hop+movement&pg=PT88&printsec=frontcover</ref></ref>https://www.google.com/books/edition/IMPULSE_URGES_AND_FANTASIES/GL-1DAEACAAJ?hl=en</ref></ref>https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/afrika-bambaataa-sex-abuse-accuser-ronald-savage-speaks-article-1.2594599</ref></ref>https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/impulse-urges-and-fantasies-ronald-savage/1123982738</ref>

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hip Hop Movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hip Hop Movement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Street sting. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hip Hop Movement draft Arbitration case request declined

In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Grievances about the actions of an administrator (like their decision to block an editor, or protect or delete a page) should also be approached in the first instance on the administrator's talk page, but administrators are expected to be accountable and you can ask on the administrators' incidents noticeboard for the action to be reviewed. In the case of deletions by deletion discussion, you can also open a deletion review.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact myself or a member of the community if you have more questions.

I would just like to reiterate that my talk page is always open for you to ask questions - if I cannot help directly, I can point you to places where you can get help. Alternatively you can reply here - I will keep your talk page on my watchlist for a while. Thanks, firefly ( t · c ) 20:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that I have seen your post on my talk page and will reply substantively tomorrow. Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 21:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI response on my talk page

Hi Street sting, thank your for your long reply on my talk page but you did not address my concern. What is your affiliation with Ron Savage and the Hip Hop Movement? Please reply here and please also be succinct (try your best not to write a diatribe). S0091 (talk) 22:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly: if this has already been addressed in communications to Arbcom then I do not want to belabor this editor to state something they may have already addressed elsewhere. Street sting, I will also rely on you a bit here. If this has already been addressed in private conversations you have had with Arbcom you may simply state so here. S0091 (talk) 00:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

S0091, while I do not know whether Street sting sent any private communications to the Arbitration Committee, nothing has been 'addressed' as such. The Committee chose to decline the case request as premature. firefly ( t · c ) 06:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Arbcom i just was telling everywhere on here what happened, I don't know who talk page i been on anymore, I just felt I was being attacked because of this hip hop recording artist, Oh, I felt his story and his pain because I can relate to what happened to him, so I read up on him and what was happening to him and I heard of him before in hip hop everybody did, I never knew about the things he said, I just wanted to do something nice for the guy, other than that, thats it. Do you're think you all can get me to meet him? Street sting (talk) 04:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing War, Violations, Conflict of Interest, Autobiography

Street Sting, you are engaged in an editing war and have been reported to Wikipedia and patroling editors. You are overzealously deleting news on Ronald Savage with verifiable sources. You have been warned numerous times since the creation of this page. HipHop4thEstate (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]