User talk:Stoicjoe
Jmiyaki, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Jmiyaki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC) |
Editing
[edit]Hi Joe. I've reverted or edited the bulk of your recent additions. Please check the article to see if what your adding is already in there, and please check to see if it's pertinent to the article.
It's also better if citations are not just bare URLs. There are a number of templates available, with cite news, cite book and (rarely) cite web being the most useful. Bromley86 (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- You should, where possible, use the |page= (or |pages= ) field (or |at= if it's something like a paragraph reference, like a biblical verse). The idea is to make it as easy as possible for someone else to verify the information. If there's an online copy avaiable, a |url= field is also best.
- And the reference itself goes at the end of the sentence or paragraph that it covers, after the punctuation. There are exceptions though; the key thing is, you don't want to give the impression that you're supporting a point that you're not.
- So, this is incorrect: Thomas is a male name, Sara[Book of Baby names] is a female one.
- While correct, this is not as accurate as it might be: Thomas is a male name, Sara is a female one.[Book of Baby names]
- This is preferred: Thomas is a male name,[Book of Baby names, p.350] Sara is a female one.[Book of Baby names, p.502]
- If there was already an unreferenced sentence in the paragraph before you added one to the end, then add a fact tag ({{fact}}) to that sentence to prevent giving the impression that your new cite covers the whole para. So:
- In French-speaking countries, Jacques is a common name; in English-speaking ones, John is likewise.{{fact}} Thomas is a male name,[Book of Baby names, p.350] Sara is a female one.[Book of Baby names, p.502]
- Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help Bromley86
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Stoicjoe, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Social justice has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Please fix ISBNs
[edit]You added an invalid ISBN to about 20 articles. The correct ISBN is 9780553906493. Please fix all of them. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
References
[edit]Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Stoicjoe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)