User talk:Steam n Whistle

Steam n Whistle, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Steam n Whistle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Dane Griffiths

Hi, I'm not sure what source your using to add him but, Dane Griffiths hasn't been with Cardiff since 2015 [1]. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Griffiths

I used Transfermarkt, but thanks a lot for letting me know,do you know who he’s with now? Steam n Whistle (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He was with Brecon Corries last year [2] but I'm not sure if he's still there. Kosack (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Colback

Why has Jack Colback been moved to the Newcastle reserves? If that’s where he is, HE NEEDS TO GET MOVING! Steam n Whistle (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Fulham F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Łukasz Fabiański, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Liverpool F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Player included in source removed without explanation. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Smithies. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Culdee-Fell Railway Engines

Hello, Steam n Whistle. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Culdee-Fell Railway Engines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hythe Town F.C. 2018-19 season

Hello Steam n Whistle. This draft does not pass our guidelines (specifically WP:NSEASONS), so would not be moved into mainspace. As a result, I'd advise not wasting your time making any further edits to it. Cheers, Number 5 7 10:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Steam n Whistle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cardiff City F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems as you have no intention of sourcing your work, I've dug up some sources myself for Konopka leaving. It would be very helpful if you edited cooperatively in future, cheers. Kosack (talk) 07:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I probably shouldn't have bitten so much. However, this is the second time I've had to come to your talk page because you have kept adding unsourced info with no explanation. Please try include references or an edit summary in future to avoid any confusion and such. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dejan Iliev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dejan Iliev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kyle Lafferty. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucas Perri

The article Lucas Perri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

page is recreation of twice deleted page relating to footballer who does not pass WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spike 'em (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucas Perri

The article Lucas Perri has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 14:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucas Perri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Perri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Perri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spike 'em (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Luka Jović. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A diff of the non-AGF edit can be found here: [3] EggRoll97 ^(talk) 06:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Number 29

Hi regarding this edit you made: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Aaron_Wan-Bissaka&type=revision&diff=903999216&oldid=903999128, his club number for Palace was 29, but as of yet, I think this has not been reported for his new club. Please undo your changes if this was in error. Thanks GiggsIsLegend (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hythe Town F.C. 2018-19 season

Hello, Steam n Whistle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hythe Town F.C. 2018-19 season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 23:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Phil Jagielka, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Chelsea F.C.. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. I have found and added a source for your changes to the Aaron Simpson (footballer, born 1999) article, but please ensure you include a source yourself in future. Please let me know if you have any questions or queries. Thanks, Giant Snowman 07:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: that this user is still adding correct but unsourced content to BLPs. Giant Snowman 07:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talksport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Gray and Jamie O'Hara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]