Jump to content

User talk:Stan2525/Archive4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:In_my_mind.jpg

[edit]

Image:In_my_mind.jpg is missing the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale and was being used in violation of WP:FU. The latter, I've cleared up. --Yamla 01:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Gender Studies

[edit]

Hi Revolución, I'm asking some Project Gender Studies members for their opinions on a few changes to the project templates. The discussion is here. If you're interested please have a look. I'd also like to have the project page unprotected so it could be editted to give due balance to the Gender Theory activities of the project as well as the removal of systemic bias activities - if you have any opinions on this it's discussed here?--Cailil 01:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Stan2525, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
  • Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • If you're planning to stay, have a square in our quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 02:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter!
Issue III - February 1, 2007

Announcement: If someone requests help or feedback on an article, please try your hardest to help them out if you are able. Thank you.

Project News
  • The LGBT Portal has once again been revamped and a work rota started. Efforts towards Featured Portal status are slowly coming together.
  • The assessment system has been a great success, we have tagged over 4000 articles! Please tag any LGBT related articles you come across by adding {{LGBTProject | class=}} to the talkpage. Please see the Assessment Department for how to assess an article according to the grading system.
  • The Translation department has changed its focus, to LGBT articles about non-English topics and people on which there may be more information on the relevant foreign Wikipedia. Please add your name if you are fluent in any language other than English.
  • Jumpaclass is picking up slowly, with nine people having entered. With over 2000 stubs we need to improve our article quality. Please sign up and get it going! Challenge another user to see how far you can jump a stub!
  • There is an ongoing discussion about the current LGBT categorisation system here, here, and a little bit here. A special page has now been set up here to deal with this.
  • A Watchlist has been set up to monitor controversial and/or highly vandalised articles. It can also be used for article disputes, just add a note explaining the nature of the dispute.
  • With the influx of so many active members, there is now enough support for a LGBT studies peer review, which may be found here. It's in the beta phase at the moment, so bear with us if we make any mistakes. Feel free to peer review any articles you have been working on.
  • It was agreed this month to start reducing the uses of the Notice board, as many members felt that it was not effective. An open tasks template has been created, bringing together important announcements, FAC/FARs, Peer reviews, XfDs, the COTM, and requested articles. You may desire to watchlist it. A Deletion sorting subpage is also now working to bring together XfDs - this should be bot-driven, but we have not currently tagged enough articles to make this fully automated, so please update the list with any LGBT-related XfDs you come across.
Article news
Member News

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please drop me a line.
If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Dev920 know.

I noticed that you were vocal in debates about the race and intelligence articles earlier. We need your help right now. We're coming very close to revising this article to be something like neutral and only one user is standing in the way! What we need now is an overwhelming show of support from all of the people over the past few years who have complained and criticized this article. We're going to put everything in historical context, so that research some regard as "scientific racism" can't be presented as pure, unquestioned, unbiased science. This will give readers the chance to make up their mind with the appropriate context. Please stop by the talk page and read the section on "moving forward" I hope that you choose to be a part of this.

I know it may bee intimidating and time consuming to sift through all of the warning and banter on this talk page, but I think it is worth the effort. Hope to hear from you! --futurebird 03:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, unfortunately there are people who love to push their own racist agendas against minorities. --Revolución hablar ver 02:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khattak.jpg

[edit]

Hi! You uploaded Image:Khattak.jpg but did not specify from where you got the image. Can you please note the source on the image page and, if necessary, adjust the licence tag? Thanks. —xyzzyn 01:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LGBT Coordinator Election Notice

[edit]

This is just a quick, automated note to let you know that there is an election being conducted over the next 7 days for the position of "Coordinator" for the LGBT WikiProject. Your participation is requested. -- SatyrTN (talk · contribs)

LGBT WikiProject newsletter

[edit]

Invitation

[edit]

You have been invited to join the WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Africa. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Belovedfreak 20:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:City-Council-Districts.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:City-Council-Districts.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Map-City-Council-at-Large-Group.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Map-City-Council-at-Large-Group.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject newsletter

[edit]

SatyrBot 05:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject newsletter

[edit]

This month's project newsletter (hand delivered as SatyrTN and Dev920 are away). Best wishes, WjBscribe 03:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Socialist Party USA

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Revolución! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 08:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brian Moore (politician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GreenJoe 01:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fccj2.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fccj2.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 21:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Fccj2.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fccj2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 21:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Stgologo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stgologo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 04:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ah we Noss.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ah we Noss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fccj2.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fccj2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hadashnew.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hadashnew.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Imclogo.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imclogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ojosasi.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ojosasi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rosso relativo.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosso relativo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ya Salam.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ya Salam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Just in case you would like to know, the category you created, Category:Wikipedians against anonymous editing, is currently up for discussion here. I have left this message because you may wish to comment on this matter, or simply know about it.
--FastLizard4 (TalkLinksSign) 04:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).


Liberation News (Internationalist)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liberation News (Internationalist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Duncan (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

[edit]

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

[edit]

Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Democrats

[edit]

I have nominated List of Democrats, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Democrats. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Eurocentrism

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Eurocentrism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Benjamin Franklin's phonetic alphabet, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Benjamin Franklin's phonetic alphabet is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Benjamin Franklin's phonetic alphabet, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

adding a section on the "Economics of the Democratic Party"

[edit]

Hi Revolucion,

Are you the main person who wrote the Democratic Party Wiki entry? If so, congratulations on gathering and organizing a lot of good information!

This is my first involvement with Wikipedia, and my very first suggestion about a page. Hope I'm doing it right.

I'm a progressive Democrat, just to let you know, and believe in balanced, useful information. I'm also a writer.

Here are a couple of things that it seems to me should be included in the DP page, because they are pretty fundamental to the history and current structure and functioning of the Party.

1. The economics of the Party. There is a perennial problem faced by the Democratic Party (and currently by Presidential candidates Clinton and Obama): if the Party's candidates or elected representatives take positions that disagree with economic interests (or their lobbies) upon which Party financing relies, then those interests are wont to retaliate by supporting more conservative Democrats and/or supporting Republicans. There is a dynamic of dependency here that very much shapes what goes on in the Dem. Party. In fact one could say that this history of the Party is a perennial balancing act between the grassroots on the one hand, and the influence of moneyed interests on the other.

There have some efforts made to reform campaign financing on both state and federal levels, and -- as both Clinton and Obama are now saying -- to rein in the influence of the lobbies. Doing so would alter the Democratic Party in fundamental ways.

2. Grassroots upsurge. In the past several years we have seen an upsurge of grassroots activity within the Party. The Party is being renewed from within. There are also grassroots activists and organizations that that ally themselves with the Party, even if they do not do so from within official structures like the Democratic clubs. E.g. Progressive Democrats of America, Democracy for America, and the many progressive blogs. This grassroots energy, much of it Internet-based, bears mentioning in a description of the Democratic Party today. I could try writing this up to update the current Wikipedia entry, but am happy to let someone else do the honor!

Any thoughts about this?

Thanks,

Raymond Barglow Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club Berkeley, CA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbarglow (talkcontribs) 16:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Inactivity

[edit]

In trying to deliver the LGBT Project newsletter, SatyrBot detected a period of three months of inactivity from this account. You have been placed in our "Inactive Members" section. If this has been done in error, please let my bot owner know and change your status in he project. Thanks! SatyrBot (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your redirection of this article. If you really think it's a "bogus article", take it to WP:AfD, where I daresay you will have at least some agreement. Redirecting it to Homosexuality (or any other article) without discussion though is inappropriate. Regards, Aleta Sing 03:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re-opened rating discussion

[edit]

I and have reopened the discussion here [[1]]. Would you care to chime in? thanks. Smatprt (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


License tagging for File:Swine Flu Florida.PNG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Swine Flu Florida.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Racism in LGBT issue

[edit]

Holla. I saw you worked on the Racism in the LGBT community article. I think person nicknamed Am86 is making a great effort to destroy this article. I see you probably had a possitive impact on it. I actually found it by accident, because I made the issue LGBT and multiculturalism (I was interested in that point in mutliculturalism and defining diversity and toleration in LGBT) and someone placed See also division for Racism in LGBT culture. Which was shocking for me. I changed that to Mutliculturalist attitudes in LGBT are oposite of racism in LGBT and went to see whats up with this racism article. I placed side bar discrimination but I feel like one or many persons are consistingly putting effort to make this issue sound like pro-racist. I also have found out that discriminative attituds are very common and even tolerated in English Wikipedia in many ways. Which is quite surprising for me since in other wikis thing are not in this way! I feel like Wikipedia dont have policies of anti-discriminative actions of editors and even administrators. What do ya think? --SofieElisBexter (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]