Jump to content

User talk:Staicontent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Roberto Ferrante has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roberto Ferrante. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your suggestion! I have added a source for the date of birth and now I am waiting for the draft to be approved, but it has been a while since I submitted it. I hope it can be approved soon! Staicontent (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Ferrante (August 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Staicontent! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roberto Ferrante

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Staicontent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roberto Ferrante, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roberto Ferrante

[edit]

Hello, Staicontent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roberto Ferrante".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberto Ferrante (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 10:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Staicontent. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Staicontent. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Staicontent|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]