User talk:StaedtlerTheOnLy

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, StaedtlerTheOnLy, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Rape culture seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 10:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Kiss, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Acts in infoboxes

Please read Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. To qualify as an associated act, people have to meet one or more of the following criteria:

Multiple (at least 3) songs together (excluding those that only involve songwriting and/or producing). An example of this is Rihanna and Drake (rapper).
A collaborative album together, such as Jay Z and Kanye West working together on Watch the Throne.
A co-headlining your together, such as Demi Lovato and Nick Jonas embarking on the "Future Now Tour" together.
A group one is/was part of, such as Ringo Starr being part of The Beatles.

With this in mind, please don't just inflate listings with people who only work together on one or two songs. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm El C. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. El_C 08:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ethnic groups in Delhi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Punjabis, you may be blocked from editing. The source in the article clearly says 35%, not 65% as you changed it to. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Arijit Singh seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Punjabis, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for deliberately adding a false claim about the share of Punjabis in Delhi, just as you did in May of this year (see further up on this page). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 12:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are we really gonna go over this again Mr Thomas I'm not some 16 year old troll whatever I added was researched not disruptive editing and please stop the hollow threats when I edited the article in May I did cite a source but you chose to ignore it.It seems to me you enjoy being a(Insert) StaedtlerTheOnLy (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Punjabis. See previous messages. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you StaedtlerTheOnLy (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock| I had no idea cursing someone came under disruptive editing wow what a vague definition you know what I don't care block or unblock me I quit see you later s***lords StaedtlerTheOnLy (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]