User talk:Srp1220

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Srp1220, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:31, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Draft:Visual-CFD, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srp1220. Non-free files such as File:ESI Group logo.svg cannot be used in drafts per Wikipedia non-free content use criterion #9 and Wikipedia:Drafts#Non-free image use; so, please don't re-add this file to that draft again until after the draft has been approved as an article. However, even if this were an article, I don't think the file's non-free use would be allowed per item 17 of Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images_2. Wikipedia generally allows company logos to be uploaded and used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about parent companies, but not in articles about child entities such as subsidiaries, divisions, branches or even company products. In such cases a logo specific to the particular child entity, such as a logo for Visual-CFD or even the product packaging, is preferred to using the maker's/developer's company logo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Visual-CFD or ESI group

Hi again Srp1220. Since your a new account and all of your edits so far are related to Visual-CFD, I'm wondering if you have any connection to ESI Group. If you do, then you likely would be considered to have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest with respect to anything written about the group or its products on Wikipedia, and therefore should take a look at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide to familiarize yourself relevant conflict of interest guidelines, particularly the part about paid editing. If none of this applies to you, then you might want to look at those guidelines anyway because the also contain general information which can be helpful to a new editor.

Regardless of the above, since this seems to be your first attempt at writing a Wikpedia article, you might want to look at Wikipedia:Your first article for some general suggestions. It would also be a good idea for you to submit your draft to Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review when you think it's ready for article status. An AfC reviewer will look at the draft and provide suggestions on things which can still be improved so as to ensure the article doesn't get nominated or tagged for deletion after it has been moved to the article mainspace. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Srp1220, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Srp1220! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Srp1220! You created a thread called Why my article is not being published? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Kalammawadi Dam.

User:Willbb234 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You need to add citations per WP:V. I expect to see them soon, and I also expect the article's grammar to be corrected as it is hard to understand otherwise.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234 (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Srp1220. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

August 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of employment

Hello Srp1220. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Visual-CFD, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Srp1220. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Srp1220|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Srp1220! You created a thread called My Article page "Visual-CFD" is not being published at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visual-CFD (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ComplexRational were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources appear to be independent of the subject; the publisher's website is not sufficient to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visual-CFD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Visual-CFD, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ComplexRational (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visual-CFD (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For the same reasons as the last rejection.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Visual-CFD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Visual-CFD, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Visual-CFD

Hello, Srp1220. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Visual-CFD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 06:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]