User talk:Sreejithk2000/August 2010

Home Sunuraju Archive - 2006 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 Nov,Dec 2010 Archive - 2011 Archive - 2012 2013-2016 2017-2020 2021-2022

Nishan (actor)

User:Sreejithk2000/Nishan (actor) is now in your user space for you to improve! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Salvia Painting MPM.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Salvia Painting MPM.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Mark P Maxwell (mark@mpm7.com) is the author of the picture and has granted permission for its use. In fact it was Mark himself who originally uploaded it (a previously deleted version), as well as already adding his express permission with an edit to the current version. Anyway, I've forwarded email correspondence between myself and Mark to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org + permissions-en@wikimedia.org in the hope that it will help. I have to say though that it is quite frustrating to have recurring issues being raised over permissions here. The whole image upload process seems to be rather overcomplicated, officious, and more onerous than it perhaps ought to be.

--SallyScot (talk) 19:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sreejithk2000/Nishan (actor)

Hi, I think you should expand the lead section more of User:Sreejithk2000/Nishan (actor) as it sill may not survive an no claim of importance A7 nom. Is there any material in other languages that could be used for facts? You have improved it however. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FUR KM Mathew

Please see this. --Vssun (talk) 03:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SVG logos

Hi, I noticed that you downsized several SVG fair-use logos recently. However, by the very nature of the SVG format, reducing the nominal size doesn't reduce the resolution, since SVGs can be scaled to any size. Perhaps there's some aspect of the non-free policy I'm not familiar with, but I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish. Cheers, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SVG files can be rescaled to any size, so why do we need to store large size non-free SVGs in wikipedia? Some or may be most people will be unaware of SVG format and its advantages and they might feel wiki is storing high resolution images. By downscaling the display size, SVG files suffer no loss and so we don't need to worry about it. But for why we need to downsize it, please put a message on the editors who puts {{Non-free reduce}} tag on the images. They might be able to explain this better. Like you, I am also not familiar with all the aspects of the non-free policy. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:48, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re: NOTOC

It removes the table of contents (NOT(able)O(f)C(ontents)). Because of the number of section headings, it automatically creates the TOC, but you remove them on short articles. Lugnuts (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your "removal of deprecated parameters"

Why did you delete cited content here, in the middle of a disputed section? If you are using a regex or script, it may have an error. --Lexein (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out. I was running a script which removed the deprecated parameter "website" and it had an issue which I fixed now. This was a great help. I appreciate your time to bring it to my notice. --13:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Here's another error made by the script. Removing the two brackets at the end made the template not show up. Just for your information. Cheers, Tim 1357 ^talk 04:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please read

As rightly understood by User talk:Magog the Ogre the Indian copyright act says the following: " ... The general rule is that copyright lasts for 60 years. In the case of original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works the 60-year period is counted from the year following the death of the author. In the case of cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, posthumous publications, anonymous and pseudonymous publications, works of government and works of international organisations, the 60-year period is counted from the date of publication..." (http://copyright.gov.in/Documents/handbook.html) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.78.182 (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about. Is there a specific image which has this copyright problem? Or even before that, are you talking to the right person? --Sreejith K (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

file reduction

You reduced the size of File:PowerofThreebox.jpg, a file I uploaded. I'm wondering if another file I uploaded, File:Graystripetrilogy.jpg is too big as well. If so, could you please resize it fo me? Thanks, Bramble claw x 20:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 07:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Bramble claw x 22:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irides

Hey, I've noted that most of my pictures for my Irides article were tagged for deletion, but you lowered the resolution and most are acceptable now, I appreciate your help but could you explain the logic of reducing resolution, I understand why the cover has to be resized (so it isn't used commercially), but resizing the screenshots?

This image is still tagged for deletion http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Multiplayer.png

I've given the source for it, and the source owns the copy right yet the image has a copyright tag

Thanks--Cube b3 (talk) 13:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]