User talk:Sreejit TK Ramchand

November 2022

Hello, I'm Gobonobo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lahari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 13:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the proof for that I am TK RAMCHAND. Sreejit TK Ramchand (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the image of the user's ID card per his request at the Teahouse. David10244 (talk) 07:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may be the first time in the history of Wikipedia that the all-in-all creator of a film, himself come to the page about his film to edit it. So, naturally there may arise technical problems. There is no one else in this world other than I, who can authoritatively speak about Lahari. So, kindly correct the mistake. Sreejit TK Ramchand (talk) 10:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

THE Hindu, Friday, July 25, 1980 Sreejit TK Ramchand (talk) 07:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, many many many people come to Wikipedia under the mistaken impression that it is appropriate for them to edit articles about themselves, their business, their band, their film etc. The only reason that Wikipedia has any interest at all in whether you are Ramchand or not is that if you are, you have a conflict of interest and are therefore one of the few people in the world who should not directly edit the article Lahari, but rather should make edit requests for changes to it.

If it is indeed true that There is no one else in this world other than I, who can authoritatively speak about Lahari, then the film does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability, and no article about it can be accepted. Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. I have tagged the article appropriately.

At present the article does absolutely nothing to establish that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability: the three citations are mere listings, and do not contribute in any way towards notabilily. I am not interested enough to go looking for proper sources myself, so it may indeed be notable by Wikipedia's criteria, or it may not. What the article desperately needs is for somebody to find some sources each of which is reliably published, wholly independent of you and of anybody else involved in the film, and containing significant coverage of the film. ColinFine (talk) 17:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a man aged 91. I wish someone young to create the article BHARATHI A New Script. My only aim in trying to create this article is see that a Good Script is not lost to the world. I am ready to supply the one who comes forward all the data, all the images and literature are already uploaded in Wikimedia. I shall clear all the doubts. Kindly contact me by sending email. I am too tired. Kindly reply. Sreejit TK Ramchand (talk) 11:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed editing on the Sandbox of Bharathi, A New script. I have openly revealed that I have a conflict of interest, Is there any way to see some one taking up the work and the article coming out . Anybody can take up the work. I am of the hope that some one will do something. I don't know what to do. I leave it to you. Kindly inform me how I should proceed.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sreejit TK Ramchand! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sreejit TK Ramchand/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sreejit TK Ramchand/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]