User talk:SpongebobFan2004

SpongebobFan2004, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SpongebobFan2004! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi SpongebobFan2004!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot

Orphaned non-free image File:Army of Lovers Videovaganza 1990-1993.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Army of Lovers Videovaganza 1990-1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supernatural AOL.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supernatural AOL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Videovaganza 1990-1993 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Videovaganza 1990-1993, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Judgment Day (Army of Lovers song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Judgment Day (Army of Lovers song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Videovaganza 1990-1993 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Videovaganza 1990-1993, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Judgment Day (Army of Lovers song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Judgment Day (Army of Lovers song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Obsession AOL 1992.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Obsession AOL 1992.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Videovaganza 1990-1993

Don't remove the AFD template from Videovaganza 1990-1993 or blank the AFD discussion page. If you feel the article should not be deleted, make your case on the AFD discussion page. Removing the templates and blanking the page don't accomplish anything, because those edits will just be undone. Schazjmd (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at La Plage De Saint Tropez. Praxidicae (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Judgment Day Army of Lovers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Judgment Day Army of Lovers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpongebobFan2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, i want to admit the truth about myself. I'm only 14 and i barely read anything about rules and stuff like that. I thought it was just a place where people can chat and edit. I wish I knew all of this earlier. If anyone could help me, that would be nice. I'm only a kid ya know, and sometimes I can do stupid stuff without knowing the consenquences. If there's anyway i can make it up for everyone, can you please tell me. Thanks and have a nice day.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpongebobFan2004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, i'm doing this again because I now understand how to be fully unblocked. I have been blocked as a sock puppeet, i had an old account called Michaeldavisxoxo which i got blocked on their too. On my old account, all I did was fix a mistake and then they blocked me for "vandalism". I got declined for my unblock request and wasn't allowed to do it gain. Or unless i was and i didn't realize it. When I made this account, I'm a big fan of Army of Lovers so I thought if there was more pages, people can learn more about the songs and it can make everyone happy. Since AOL doesn't have their own fan wiki like ABBA does, and both bands are from Sweden. I didn't want to damage or disrupt Wikipedia, but I guess i did accidentally without realizing it. For who I am, I try to be nice, but sometimes people can go too far and I might get too angry sometimes. I want to make a commitment. I, Michael Davis, have understood why I have been blocked as a sock puppet, and I promise to make useful contributions, and not comtunue to damage or disrupt Wikipedia, and I promise that all of this will never happen again. Thanks for reading, have a nice day.

Decline reason:

Thank you for agreeing not to continue violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. You are not eligible for unblock consideration here but are free to request an unblock over at Michaeldavisxoxo. Given your block evasion here, along with your substantial history of inappropriate edits here, you should probably apply under WP:SO no sooner than six months from now. You will want to refrain from editing for those six months. I am revoking your talk page access here as there's no chance you'll be unblocked here. Yamla (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.