User talk:Speed2023

October 2023

Thanks for contributing to the article Stenoma oxyschista. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll keep this in mind while contributing forward to Wikipedia Community. Speed2023 (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johan Lora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will make sure of it. Speed2023 (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sources" to Hamas hostage page

Please stop "citing" links that go to pages about the release of Hamas hostages, as you did on the Chiliquín District, immediately. This could be considered vandalism and will get you banned from this project. I have already reverted a number of them - do not make any more. I strongly suggest you stop trying to find citations and find a mentor or go to the Teahouse for support and guidance in this matter. Kazamzam (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will take care of it while moving forward with the edits. Thank you. Speed2023 (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vasil Kacarov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vasil Kacarov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vasil Kacarov (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vasil Kacarov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Speed2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EuphonyRandolph per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EuphonyRandolph. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 19:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speed2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account that is mentioned under sock puppetry has no connection with my account, and I can not find any common edit or subject under which you have claimed the block, kindly first look thoroughly before making claims and a proper proof of edits. The work I have done as a Wikipedia editor can not go unnoticed and I am new trying to learn a thing here, I would request you to kindly lift the block so that I can continue to serve the community.

I have also checked tools of SPI and Interaction Timeline and cant find any sock puppet evidence against my account, so kindly refrain from false claims and lift my ban so that I can continue to serve the community.Speed2023 (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Any checkuser can look and verify the EuphonyRandolph connection. I've reverified the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EuphonyRandolph and the results are accurate. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speed2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no connection as per I notoced, no pages, no edits seems to be concurrent, kindly if you can see any evidence please guide me through it as I can assure you I have no connections with the account nor I have ever tried to create two accounts. I just want to comply with the guidelines and serve the community kindly help me out hereSpeed2023 (talk) 19:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Rafaelqaiser in as straight-forward a technical match as I've seen in my time as a WP:CHECKUSER. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Speed2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account you mentioned has no connection with thsi account, nor I can find any activity remotely similiar in both of the accounts, I cannot understand the direct match purpose here, its a request to lift the ban so that I could continue to serve Wikipedia community.Speed2023 (talk) 22:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear technical evidence of socking. Talk page access revoked. If you ever decide to come clean and want to try for the Standard Offer, WP:UTRS is available to you. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.